基于ESDA的小流域城市带碳足迹时空分布及影响因素分析——以闽江流域经济带为例
Analysis of the Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Carbon Footprints and Influencing Factors in Small Watershed Urban Belts Based on ESDA—Taking the Minjiang River Basin Economic Belt as an Example
DOI: 10.12677/SD.2023.131033, PDF,   
作者: 陈 兰:北京农业职业学院,北京
关键词: ESDA流域碳足迹GWTR模型ESDA Watershed Carbon Footprint GWTR Model
摘要: 为正确把握生态环境保护和经济发展的关系,为构建闽江流域经济带提供理论依据,以闽江流域33个县区为研究区域构建经济发展指数和碳足迹指标核算体系评价闽江流域的经济–生态系统,通过空间自相关分析碳排放空间分异情况,并基于GTWR模型分析碳足迹指数的影响因素。实证结果显示,2012~2017年约有38%的区县RC值 > 1,区域生态承载超过应承受的水平,虽然总体上全域生态系统承载能力较强,但呈现出弱化趋势;碳足迹指数空间布局上呈现出多个热力值,区域经济发展与碳排放存在空间分布的不平衡性;农业活动、固定资产投资和能源消费是对碳足迹指数波动的主要贡献因素。因此,在构造闽江经济带的过程中,碳足迹水平较高的区域既要发展经济,又要保护生态环境,碳排放控制与碳汇吸收应同步进行;流域范围内,需推进低碳经济的发展模式,应不断提升城镇化水平,优化能源使用配置,提升农业生产力水平,才能实现绿水青山。
Abstract: In order to correctly grasp the relationship between ecological environmental protection and economic development and provide a theoretical basis for the construction of the Minjiang River Basin Economic Belt, the economic development index and carbon footprint index accounting system were constructed to evaluate the economic-ecological system of the Minjiang River Basin using 33 counties and districts in the Minjiang River Basin as the study area, analyze the spatial variation of carbon emissions through spatial autocorrelation, and analyze the influencing factors of the carbon footprint index based on the GTWR model. The empirical results show that about 38% of the districts and counties have RC values > 1 from 2012 to 2017, the regional ecological carrying capacity exceeds the level that should be borne, and although the overall carrying capacity of the region-wide ecosystem is strong, it shows a trend of weakening; the spatial layout of the carbon footprint index shows multiple heat values, and there is an imbalance in the spatial distribution of regional economic development and carbon emissions; agricultural activities, fixed asset investment and energy consumption are the main contributors to the fluctuation of the carbon footprint index. Therefore, in the process of constructing the Minjiang River Economic Zone, regions with high carbon footprint levels should both develop their economy and protect the ecological environment, and carbon emission control and carbon sink absorption should be carried out simultaneously; within the basin, the development model of the low-carbon economy needs to be promoted, and the level of urbanization should be continuously improved, the allocation of energy use should be optimized, and the level of agricultural productivity should be enhanced in order to achieve green water and green mountains.
文章引用:陈兰. 基于ESDA的小流域城市带碳足迹时空分布及影响因素分析——以闽江流域经济带为例[J]. 可持续发展, 2023, 13(1): 285-301. https://doi.org/10.12677/SD.2023.131033

参考文献

[1] 邱宇, 陈英姿, 饶清华, 林秀珠, 陈文花. 基于排污权的闽江流域跨界生态补偿研究. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2839-2847.
[2] 饶清华, 林秀珠, 邱宇, 陈芳. 基于机会成本的闽江流域生态补偿标准研究. 海洋环境科学, 2018, 37(5): 655-662.
[3] 林秀珠, 李小斌, 李家兵, 饶清华. 基于机会成本和生态系统服务价值的闽江流域生态补偿标准研究. 水土保持研究, 2017, 24(2): 314-319.
[4] 兰紫橙, 贾岚, 程煜. 闽江流域生态系统服务价值评估及权衡协同关系. 生态学报, 2020, 40(12): 3909-3920.
[5] 饶清华, 林秀珠. 基于水环境容量的闽江流域跨界生态补偿标准研究. 中国农村水利水电, 2017(11): 73-77+82.
[6] 饶清华, 颜梦佳, 林秀珠, 邱宇, 许丽忠. 基于帕累托改进的闽江流域生态补偿标准研究. 中国环境科学, 2016, 36(4): 1235-1241.
[7] 韩凌芬, 胡熠, 黎元生. 基于博弈论视角的闽江流域生态补偿机制分析. 中国水利, 2009(11): 10-12.
[8] 饶清华, 林秀珠, 李家兵, 陈琪, 陈文花. 流域社会经济与水环境质量耦合协调度分析. 中国环境科学, 2019, 39(4): 1784-1792.
[9] 应凌霄, 王军, 周妍. 闽江流域生态安全格局及其生态保护修复措施. 生态学报, 2019, 39(23): 8857-8866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 李雪松, 龙湘雪, 齐晓旭. 长江经济带城市经济-社会-环境耦合协调发展的动态演化与分析. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(3): 505-516.
[11] 毛先成, 黄继先, 邓吉秋, 等. 空间分析建模与应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2015: 124.
[12] 张精, 方堉, 魏锦达, 林佳壕, 陈培彬, 朱朝枝. 基于碳足迹的安徽省农田生态系统碳源/汇时空差异[J]. 福建农业学报, 2021, 36(1): 78-90.
[13] Huang, B., Wu, B. and Barry, M. (2010) Geographically and Temporally Weighted Regression for Modeling Spatio-Temporal Variation in House Prices. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24, 383-401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] 沈杨, 汪聪聪, 高超, 丁镭. 基于城市化的浙江省湾区经济带碳排放时空分布特征及影响因素分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(2): 329-342.