前列腺增生与勃起功能障碍因果关系的孟德尔随机化研究
Mendelian Randomization Study of Causality between Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Erectile Dysfunction
摘要: 目的:探讨良性前列腺增生(Benign prostatic hyperplasia, BPH)与勃起功能障碍(Erectile dysfunction, ED)的因果关系。方法:使用公开的BPH及ED全基因组关联研究(Genome-wide association study, GWAS)汇总数据集分别作为暴露因素及结局变量,运用逆方差加权法、简单模式法、加权中值法、加权模式法及MR-Egger法进行两样本孟德尔随机化(Two-sample Mendelian randomization, TSMR)分析。结果:经筛选确定23个单核苷酸多态性(Single nucleotide polymorphism, SNP)作为工具变量,逆方差加权法支持前列腺增生与勃起功能障碍的因果关系(OR and 95% CI: 1.130, 1.014~1.259; p = 0.026)。简单模式法(Simple mode)也显示出相同的因果关系(OR and 95% CI: 1.370, 1.033~1.819; p = 0.040)。MR-Egger:(OR and 95% CI: 1.276, 0.836~1.946; p = 0.271);加权中位数法:(OR and 95% CI: 1.151, 0.979~1.354; p = 0.090);加权模式法:(OR and 95% CI: 1.267, 0.989~1.622; p = 0.074)。工具变量之间可认为不存在异质性与水平多效性;使用“留一法”(leave-one-out)进行敏感性分析,因果效应稳健。结论:孟德尔随机化分析结果支持BPH与ED风险增加存在因果关系,为ED的预防和治疗提供了新思路。
Abstract: Objective: To explore the causal relationship between benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and the risk of erectile dysfunction (ED). Methods: The published genome-wide association studies-wide as-sociation study (GWAS) BPH and ED data set were used as the exposure factor andoutcome varia-bles, respectively. Two-sample Mendelian randomization (TSMR) analysis was performed using in-verse variance weighted, simple mode, weighted median, weighted mode methods and MR-Egger regression. Results: Twenty-three SNPs were selected as the instrumental variables, and the in-verse variance weighted method supported the causal relationship between BPH and risk of ED (OR and 95% CI: 1.130, 1.014~1.259; p = 0.026). Simple mode also showed the same causal association (OR and 95% CI: 1.370, 1.033~1.819; p = 0.040). MR-Egger: (OR and 95% CI: 1.276, 0.836~1.946; p = 0.271); Weighted median: (OR and 95% CI: 1.151, 0.979~1.354; p = 0.090); Weighted mode: (OR and 95% CI: 1.267, 0.989~1.622; p = 0.074). It could be considered that there was no heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropic effect between instrumental variables. The causal effect was robust using the “Leave-one-out” method for sensitivity analysis. Conclusion: Two-sample Mendelian randomiza-tion supports the causal relationship between BPH and increased risk of ED, which provides a new idea for the prevention and treatment of ED.
文章引用:张玉浩, 焦伟. 前列腺增生与勃起功能障碍因果关系的孟德尔随机化研究[J]. 临床医学进展, 2023, 13(2): 1356-1363. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2023.132187

参考文献

[1] Thorpe, A. and Neal, D. (2003) Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. The Lancet (London, England), 361, 1359-1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] 中华医学会老年医学分会, 中华老年医学杂志编辑委员会. 老年人良性前列腺增生症/下尿路症状药物治疗共识(2015) [J]. 中华老年医学杂志, 2015, 34(12): 1380-1387.
[3] NIH Consensus Development Panel on Impotence (1993) NIH Consensus Conference. Impotence. JAMA, 270, 83-90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Yafi, F.A., Jenkins, L., Albersen, M., et al. (2016) Erectile Dysfunction. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 2, 16003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Feldman, H.A., Goldstein, I., Hatzichristou, D.G., et al. (1994) Impotence and Its Medical and Psychosocial Correlates: Results of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. The Journal of Urology, 151, 54-61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Schouten, B.W., Bosch, J.L., Bernsen, R.M., et al. (2005) Incidence Rates of Erectile Dysfunction in the Dutch General Population. Effects of Definition, Clinical Relevance and Duration of Follow-Up in the Krimpen Study. International Journal of Impotence Research, 17, 58-62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Seftel, A.D., de la Rosette, J., Birt, J., et al. (2013) Coexisting Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Review of Epidemiological Data. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 67, 32-45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Sekula, P., Del Greco, M.F., Pattaro, C. and Köttgen, A. (2016) Mendelian Randomization as an Approach to Assess Causality Using Observational Data. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: JASN, 27, 3253-3265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Ference, B.A., Holmes, M.V. and Smith, G.D. (2021) Using Men-delian Randomization to Improve the Design of Randomized Trials. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, 11, a040980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Bovijn, J., Jackson, L., Censin, J., et al. (2019) GWAS Identifies Risk Locus for Erectile Dysfunction and Implicates Hypothalamic Neurobiology and Diabetes in Etiology. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 104, 157-163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Hartwig, F.P., Davies, N.M., Hemani, G. and Davey, S.G. (2016) Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization: Avoiding the Downsides of a Powerful, Widely Applicable but Potentially Fal-lible Technique. International Journal of Epidemiology, 45, 1717-1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Shim, H., Chasman, D.I., Smith, J., et al. (2015) A Multivariate Ge-nome-Wide Association Analysis of 10 LDL Subfractions, and Their Response to Statin Treatment, in 1868 Caucasians. PLOS ONE, 10, e0120758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Maciejewski, M.L., Dowd, B.E. and Norton, E.C. (2022) In-strumental Variables and Heterogeneous Treatment Effects. JAMA, 327, 1177-1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Sanderson, E., Spiller, W. and Bowden, J. (2021) Testing and Cor-recting for Weak and Pleiotropic Instruments in Two-Sample Multivariable Mendelian Randomization. Statistics in Medi-cine, 40, 5434-5452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Burgess, S., Butterworth, A. and Thompson, S.G. (2013) Mendelian Ran-domization Analysis with Multiple Genetic Variants Using Summarized Data. Genetic Epidemiology, 37, 658-665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Bowden, J., Del Greco, M.F., Minelli, C., Davey, S.G., et al. (2017) A Framework for the Investigation of Pleiotropy in Two-Sample Summary Data Mendelian Randomization. Statistics in Medicine, 36, 1783-1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Bowden, J., Davey, S.G. and Burgess, S. (2015) Mendelian Randomization with Invalid Instruments: Effect Estimation and Bias Detection through Egger Regression. International Journal of Epi-demiology, 44, 512-525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Burgess, S. and Thompson, S.G. (2017) Interpreting Findings from Men-delian Randomization Using the MR-Egger Method. European Journal of Epidemiology, 32, 377-389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Higgins, J.P., Thompson, S.G., Deeks, J.J. and Altman, D.G. (2003) Measuring Inconsistency in Meta-Analyses. BMJ, 327, 557-560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Egger, M., Smith, G.D. and Phillips, A.N. (1997) Meta-Analysis: Principles and Procedures. BMJ, 315, 1533-1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Rosen, R., Altwein, J., Boyle, P., et al. (2003) Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Male Sexual Dysfunction: The Multinational Survey of the Aging Male (MSAM-7). European Urology, 44, 637-649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Andersson, K.E. and Wagner, G. (1995) Physiology of Penile Erection. Physiological Reviews, 75, 191-236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Saenz de Tejada, I., Kim, N., Lagan, I., et al. (1989) Regulation of Adrenergic Activity in Penile Corpus Cavernosum. The Journal of Urology, 142, 1117-1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Chang, S., Hypolite, J.A., Zderic, S.A., et al. (2002) En-hanced Force Generation by Corpus Cavernosum Smooth Muscle in Rabbits with Partial Bladder Outlet Obstruction. The Journal of Urology, 167, 2636-2644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Azadzoi, K.M., Babayan, R.K., Kozlowski, R. and Siroky, M.B. (2003) Chronic Ischemia Increases Prostatic Smooth Muscle Contraction in the Rabbit. The Journal of Urology, 170, 659-663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Clemow, D.B., Steers, W.D. and Tuttle, J.B. (2000) Stretch-Activated Signaling of Nerve Growth Factor Secretion in Bladder and Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells from Hy-pertensive and Hyperactive Rats. Journal of Cellular Physiology, 183, 289-300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] Paick, S.H., Meehan, A., Lee, M., et al. (2005) The Relationship among Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, Prostate Specific Antigen and Erec-tile Dysfunction in Men with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Results from the Proscar Long-Term Efficacy and Safety Study. The Journal of Urology, 173, 903-907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Haycock, P.C., Burgess, S., Wade, K.H., et al. (2016) Best (but OFT-Forgotten) Practices: The Design, Analysis, and Interpretation of Mendelian Randomization Studies. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 103, 965-978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Smith, G.D. and Ebrahim, S. (2003) “Mendelian Randomization”: Can Genetic Epidemiology Contribute to Understanding Environmental Determinants of Disease? International Journal of Epidemiology, 32, 1-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]