基于刑法体系下高空抛物罪的法教义学分析
Legal Doctrinal Analysis of the Crime of Throwing Objects at High Altitude Based on Criminal Law System
摘要: 《刑法修正案(十一)》增设了高空抛物罪,为司法机关审理高空抛物类型的案件提供了明确的法律依据。但对于将其置于扰乱公共秩序罪的体系之下,确定其所保护的法益为公共秩序,未免有失偏颇。通过对于高空抛物罪的立法意图、保护法益以及其本质意义的分析得出,高空抛物罪的保护法益为公共法益,其中包括公共秩序法益和公共安全法益,其本质目的为维护公共安全。因此,将高空抛物罪置于扰乱公共秩序罪的体系下难免产生法理冲突,但若将其置于以危险方法危害公共安全罪的体系之下则有悖轻罪的罪刑相适原则以及刑法惩戒教育目的之嫌。要解决这一冲突,应当明确解释“情节严重”的条款,并从公共安全法益角度,以高空抛物犯罪性质轻重程度划分罪名适用情形,并以法益与构成要件为导向来制定相关的司法解释,以凸显立法目的,实现高空抛物罪同与危险方法危害公共安全罪的有效衔接。
Abstract: The 11th Amendment to the Criminal Law adds the crime of throwing objects at altitude, which provides a clear legal basis for judicial organs to try cases of throwing objects at altitude. However, it would be biased to place it under the system of disturbing public order crime and determine that the legal interest protected by it is public order. Through the analysis of the legislative intent, protection law benefit and its essential significance, it is concluded that the protection law benefit of the crime of throwing objects at high altitude is public legal interest, including public order legal interest and public security legal interest, whose essential purpose is to maintain public security. Therefore, placing the crime of throwing objects at high altitude under the system of the crime of disturbing public order will inevitably produce legal conflicts, but placing it under the system of the crime of endangering public security by dangerous means will go against the principle of appropriate punishment of misdemeanors and the purpose of criminal punishment education. In order to solve this conflict, we should clearly explain the provisions of “serious circumstances”, and from the perspective of public security legal interests, divide the applicable circumstances of the charges according to the severity of the nature of the crime of throwing objects at altitude, and formulate relevant judicial interpretations guided by legal interests and constituent elements, so as to highlight the legislative purpose and realize the effective connection between the crime of throwing objects at altitude and the crime of endangering public security by dangerous means.
文章引用:李佳桥. 基于刑法体系下高空抛物罪的法教义学分析[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2023, 12(2): 622-629. https://doi.org/10.12677/ASS.2023.122085

参考文献

[1] 《关于依法妥善审理高空抛物、坠物案件的意见》法发〔2019〕25号[Z].
[2] 张明楷. 增设新罪的原则——对《刑法修正案十一(草案)》的修改意见[J]. 政法论丛, 2020(6): 3-16.
[3] 应家贇. 高空抛物罪的保护法益及其规范适用[J]. 浙江学刊, 2021(5): 90-98.
[4] 夏伟. 风险预防逻辑下高空抛物罪的教义学阐释[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2021, 42(9): 92-98.
[5] 杨某某等3人诉胡某等7人不明坠落物损害责任案一审民事判决书(2011)监民初字第330号[Z].
[6] 盛豪杰. 高空抛物的刑法教义学解读——从《刑法修正案(十一)》引出的思考[J]. 中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 37(6): 57-66.
[7] 彭勇以危险方法危害公共安全一审刑事判决书(2020)京0108刑初1071号[Z].
[8] 张明楷. 高空抛物案的刑法学分析[J]. 法学评论, 2020, 38(3): 12-26.
[9] 周杰. “高空抛物罪”立法评析与适用难题研究[J]. 北方法学, 2021, 15(6): 109-116.
[10] 李晓明. “高空抛物”入罪的法教义学分析与方案选择[J]. 天津法学, 2020, 36(4): 56-63.
[11] 林维. 高空抛物罪的立法反思与教义适用[J]. 法学, 2021(3): 38-47.
[12] 姜涛. 高空抛物罪的刑法教义学分析[J]. 江苏社会科学, 2021(5): 111-120+243.
[13] 夏勇. 高空抛物的刑法定位——关于《刑法修正案(十一)(草案)》第一条的理解和改进[J]. 法治研究, 2020(5): 82-88.
[14] 吴帅帅, 刘艳红. “高空抛物”入刑的法教义学反思[J]. 安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021, 45(6): 100-108.
[15] 俞小海. 高空抛物犯罪的实践反思与司法判断规则[J]. 法学, 2021(12): 81-103.
[16] 李珈. 高空抛物罪适用中的疑难问题[J]. 东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021, 23(S2): 102-106.
[17] 肖中华. 轻罪的范围界定、设置原则与认定规则[J]. 贵州大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 40(1): 84-93.
[18] 余双彪. 论犯罪构成要件要素的“情节严重”[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2013(8): 30-37.
[19] 陈俊秀. 高空抛物罪的教义学阐释及司法适用——以《刑法修正案(十一)》与《高空抛物意见》为中心[J]. 北京社会科学, 2021(8): 57-66.