马鞍山淤泥质粉质黏土土性相关性研究
Study on Correlation of Soil Properties of Mucky Silty Clay in Maanshan
摘要: 岩土土性具有较强的地域性,查明其区域性,对于当地工程建设具有重要意义。本文以马鞍山江边软黏土地基为例,以淤泥质粉质黏土为研究对象,研究区域内淤泥质粉质黏土埋深浅,土层厚,查明该地软黏土地基物理力学指标对工程建设有着重要意义。对马鞍山江边软黏土地基土物理力学指标进行统计分析,发现淤泥质粉质粘土厚14 m,物理力学指标随土层深度变化小,且发现马鞍山散料物理力学指标之间存在较好的线性相关。马鞍散料场地基土淤泥质粉质黏土物理力学指标之间相关性显著,其中物理指标相关性好,尤其是孔隙比、含水率、塑限、液限及天然重度的线性拟合,其相关系数R2均大于0.9。力学指标存在一定变异性,但力学指标与物理指标间相关性好,尤其是孔隙比与压缩系数、无侧限抗压强度和内聚力之间相关性尤为显著。
Abstract: Geotechnical properties have strong regional characteristics, so it is of great significance to identify their regional characteristics for local engineering construction. In this paper, taking the soft clay foundation near the Maanshan River as an example, taking the muddy silty clay as the research object, the buried depth of the muddy silty clay in the research area is shallow, and the soil layer is thick. It is of great significance to find out the physical and mechanical indexes of the soft clay foundation in this area for engineering construction. Based on the statistical analysis of the physical and mechanical indexes of the soft clay foundation soil near the Maanshan River, it is found that the muddy silty clay is 14 m thick, and the physical and mechanical indexes change little with the depth of the soil layer. It is also found that there is a good linear correlation between the physical and mechanical indexes of Maanshan bulk materials. The physical and mechanical indexes of mucky silty clay in the foundation soil of Ma’an bulk material site are significantly correlated, among which the physical indexes are well correlated, especially the linear fitting of void ratio, water content, plastic limit, liquid limit and natural gravity, with the correlation coefficient R2 greater than 0.9. There is some variability in mechanical indexes, but the correlation between mechanical indexes and physical indexes is good, especially the correlation between void ratio and compression coefficient, unconfined compressive strength and cohesion.
文章引用:颜祖鹏. 马鞍山淤泥质粉质黏土土性相关性研究[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2023, 13(2): 107-117. https://doi.org/10.12677/AG.2023.132010

参考文献

[1] 吴山. 地基土物理指标的简易测定方法[J]. 化工矿山技术, 1974(3): 26-33, 17.
[2] 阮波, 冷伍明. 粘性土物理力学指标的统计分析[J]. 大坝观测与土工测试, 1998(1): 7-9.
[3] 别传炎, 江兆云, 郭敏. 土的比重研究[J]. 土工基础, 2003, 17(4): 61-62, 60.
[4] 方蔚成. 试述土工试验中土的物理力学指标影响因素[J]. 居业, 2020(11): 57-58.
[5] 刘连喜, 廖建生. 利用土的物理指标确定土的抗剪强度[J]. 城市勘测, 2003(3): 13-14.
[6] 王立志. 土的物理指标测定试验中几个常见问题对结果的影响[J]. 科技信息, 2012(26): 367.
[7] 韩素君. 北京地区土工试验成果及综合分析[J]. 岩土工程技术, 2019, 33(1): 40-45, 48.
[8] 沈珠江. 软土工程特性和软土地基设计[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1998(1): 100-111.
[9] 刘用海, 朱向荣, 王文军. 宁波地区典型淤泥质粘土工程特性[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2007, 35(6): 30-33.
[10] 王献礼, 曲永新, 蒋良文, 等. 云南大理洱海东缘早全新世软粘土的工程特性研究[J]. 地质力学学报, 2007, 13(3): 261-269.
[11] 刘维正, 石名磊. 低路堤下长江漫滩相沉积土的工程特性评价[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 38(5): 844-849.
[12] 张丽娟, 李彰明. 动静力排水固结法加固淤泥地基的技术及效果[J]. 沈阳建筑大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 27(5): 898-903.
[13] 叶国良, 郭述军, 朱耀庭. 超软土的工程性质分析[J]. 中国港湾建设, 2010(5): 1-9.
[14] 张宏亮. 土工试验中土的物理力学指标影响因素分析[J]. 黑龙江交通科技, 2022, 45(5): 67-69.
[15] 张丁宁. 上海滨海平原区土的热物理指标与静力触探Ps值的关系研究[J]. 城市道桥与防洪, 2022(7): 197-199.
[16] 白建文, 冯品基, 杨锐, 等. 北戴河新区粉质黏土物理力学性质研究[J]. 建筑结构, 2021, 51(S2): 1031-1040.
[17] 朱丽霞, 袁望新. 含水率对花岗岩残积土强度影响研究[J]. 山西建筑, 2022, 48(17): 109-111, 156.