磁共振联合临床病理因素预测新辅助化疗后乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转阴率
MRI Combining with Clinicopathological Factors Predict the Negative Rate of Axillary Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2023.132325, PDF,   
作者: 李正浩:青岛大学,山东 青岛;青岛大学附属医院,山东 青岛;艾宪程:山东大学第二医院,山东 济南;马天怡, 毛 艳, 吕 萌, 王海波*:青岛大学附属医院,山东 青岛
关键词: 乳腺癌新辅助化疗磁共振成像腋窝淋巴结Breast Cancer Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Magnetic Resonance Imaging Axillary Lymph Node
摘要: 目的:探索磁共振成像(MRI)联合临床病理因素预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗(NAC)后腋窝淋巴结阳性患者降期为临床阴性的可行性。方法:回顾性收集2019年1月~2021年12月于青岛大学附属医院乳腺病诊疗中心完成新辅助化疗且新辅助化疗前腋窝淋巴结穿刺病理结果为阳性,至少具有新辅助化疗前磁共振影像学资料、新辅助化疗完成后的磁共振影像学资料,并于该中心接受腋窝淋巴结清扫的病人359例。比较术前肿块穿刺标本病理类型、Ki-67、MRI评估NAC前肿块大小、腋窝淋巴结分期、新辅助化疗后MRI评估肿块疗效、腋窝淋巴结疗效对新辅助化疗后腋窝淋巴结降期为临床阴性(ypN0)的影响。结果:多因素分析显示,NAC前腋窝淋巴结分期、MRI评估NAC后肿块化疗反应、MRI评估NAC后淋巴结化疗反应、病理类型为影响NAC后ypN0的独立预测因素,且HER-2过表达型乳腺癌NAC后ypN0率最高、三阴性乳腺癌次之,Luminal型乳腺癌最低。结论:乳腺癌NAC前腋窝淋巴结分期早、NAC后经MRI评估肿块化疗反应达到CR、腋窝淋巴结化疗反应达到CR的病人,术后达到ypN0可能性更大,术前穿刺病理类型为HER-2阳性的病人术后达到ypN0的可能性最大,TNBC病人其次,Luminal型病人最小。
Abstract: Objectives: To investigate the feasibility of combining magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with clinicopathological factors in predicting the downstaging of axillary lymph node-positive patients to clinically negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Methods: Retrospectively collecting 359 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy at the breast disease treatment center of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from January 2019 to December 2021, all pa-tients had the pathological results of axillary lymph node before NAC, at least had MRI databefore and after NAC, and underwent axillary lymph node dissection in the center following the completion of NAC. The study compared the impact of preoperative biopsy pathological type, Ki-67, MRI-assessed tumor size and axillary lymph node stage prior to NAC, MRI-assessed response of the tumor andaxillary lymph nodes after NAC on the axillary lymph node downstaging to clinical nega-tivity (ypN0) after NAC. Results: Multivariate analysis demonstrated that axillary lymph node stag-ing before NAC (OR = 1.863, P = 0.021), MRI-assessed tumor (OR = 0.353, P < 0.001) and lymph node chemotherapeutic response (OR = 0.301, P < 0.001) to chemotherapy after NAC, and patho-logical type were independent predictors of pathologically negative axillary lymph nodes after NAC (ypN0), and the rate in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) positive breast cancer was the highest (OR = 0.252, P < 0.001), followed by triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and Lu-minal breast cancer was the lowest (OR = 2.783, P = 0.015). Conclusions: Patients with early axillary lymph node staging prior to NAC, MRI-assessed tumor and axillary lymph node complete response (CR) after NAC are more likely to achieve ypN0. The patients with HER-2 positive biopsy type had the highest probability of achieving ypN0 thereafter surgery, followed by TNBC patients, and the least in Luminal patients.
文章引用:李正浩, 艾宪程, 马天怡, 毛艳, 吕萌, 王海波. 磁共振联合临床病理因素预测新辅助化疗后乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转阴率[J]. 临床医学进展, 2023, 13(2): 2325-2332. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2023.132325

参考文献

[1] 牟鹏, 厉红元. 乳腺癌新辅助化疗的研究进展[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2011, 18(9): 1011-1016.
[2] Goetz, M.P., Gradishar, W.J., Anderson, B.O., Abraham, J., Aft, R., Allison, K.H., et al. (2019) NCCN Guidelines Insights: Breast Cancer, Version 3.2018. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 17, 118-126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 高宇, 郭仁德. 乳腺癌根治术后上肢淋巴结水肿发病机制及治疗研究进展[J]. 四川解剖学杂志, 2020, 28(2): 196-197.
[4] Fleissig, A., Fallowfield, L.J., Langridge, C.I., Johnson, L., Newcombe, R.G., Dixon, J.M., et al. (2006) Post-Operative Arm Morbidity and Quality of Life. Results of the ALMANAC Randomised Trial Comparing Sentinel Node Biopsy with Standard Axillary Treatment in the Management of Patients with Early Breast Cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 95, 279-293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Kuehn, T., Bauerfeind, I., Fehm, T., Fleige, B., Hausschild, M., Helms, G., et al. (2013) Sentinel-Lymph-Node Biopsy in Patients with Breast Cancer before and after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (SENTINA): A Prospective, Multicentre Cohort Study. The Lancet Oncology, 14, 609-618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Boughey, J.C., Suman, V.J., Mittendorf, E.A., Ahrendt, G.M., Wilke, L.G., Taback, B., et al. (2013) Sentinel Lymph Node Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Node-Positive Breast Cancer: The ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) Clinical Trial. JAMA, 310, 1455-1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Krag, D.N., Anderson, S.J., Julian, T.B., Brown, A.M., Harlow, S.P., Costantino, J.P., et al. (2010) Sentinel-Lymph-Node Resection Compared with Conventional Axillary-Lymph-Node Dissection in Clinically Node-Negative Patients with Breast Cancer: Overall Survival Findings from the NSABP B-32 Randomised Phase 3 Trial. The Lancet Oncology, 11, 927-933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Mansel, R.E., Fallowfield, L., Kissin, M., Goyal, A., New-combe, R.G., Dixon, J.M., et al. (2006) Randomized Multicenter Trial of Sentinel Node Biopsy versus Standard Axillary Treatment in Operable Breast Cancer: The ALMANAC Trial. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 98, 599-609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Kuerer, H.M., Sahin, A.A., Hunt, K.K., Newman, L.A., Breslin, T.M., Ames, F.C., et al. (1999) Incidence and Impact of Documented Eradication of Breast Cancer Axillary Lymph Node Metastases before Surgery in Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Annals of Surgery, 230, 72-78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Kang, Y.-J., Han, W., Park, S., You, J.Y., Yi, H.W., Park, S., et al. (2017) Outcome Following Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy-Guided Decisions in Breast Cancer Patients with Conversion from Positive to Negative Axillary Lymph Nodes after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Re-search and Treatment, 166, 473-480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Yu, Y., He, Z., Ouyang, J., Tan, Y., Chen, Y., Gu, Y., et al. (2021) Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics Predicts Preoperative Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis to Support Sur-gical Decisions and Is Associated with Tumor Microenvironment in Invasive Breast Cancer: A Machine Learning, Mul-ticenter Study. EBioMedicine, 69, Article ID: 103460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Al-Hattali, S., Vinnicombe, S.J., Gowdh, N.M., Evans, A., Armstrong, S., Adamson, D., et al. (2019) Breast MRI and Tumour Biology Predict Axillary Lymph Node Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer. Cancer Imaging, 19, Article No. 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Boughey, J.C., McCall, L.M., Ballman, K.V., Mittendorf, E.A., Ahrendt, G.M., Wilke, L.G., et al. (2014) Tumor Biology Correlates with Rates of Breast-Conserving Surgery and Path-ologic Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Findings from the ACOSOG Z1071 (Al-liance) Prospective Multicenter Clinical Trial. Annals of Surgery, 260, 608-616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Gianni, L., Pienkowski, T., Im, Y.-H., Roman, L., Tseng, L.M., Liu, M.C., et al. (2012) Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in Women with Locally Advanced, Inflammatory, or Early HER2-Positive Breast Cancer (NeoSphere): A Randomised Multicentre, Open-Label, Phase 2 Trial. The Lancet Oncology, 13, 25-32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Mamtani, A., Barrio, A.V., King, T.A., Van Zee, K.J., Plitas, G., Pilewskie, M., et al. (2016) How Often Does Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Avoid Axillary Dissection in Patients With Histologically Confirmed Nodal Metastases? Results of a Prospective Study. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 23, 3467-3474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Colleoni, M., Bagnardi, V., Rotmensz, N., Gelber, R.D., Viale, G., Pruneri, G., et al. (2009) Increasing Steroid Hormone Receptors Expression Defines Breast Cancer Subtypes Non Responsive to Preoperative Chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 116, 359-369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] González-Santiago, S., Saura, C., Ciruelos, E., Alonso, J.L., de la Morena, P., Santisteban Eslava, M., et al. (2020) Real-World Effectiveness of Dual HER2 Blockade with Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab for Neoadjuvant Treatment of HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer (The NEOPETRA Study). Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 184, 469-479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Singh, J.C., Mamtani, A., Barrio, A., Morrow, M., Sugarman, S., Jones, L.W., et al. (2017) Pathologic Complete Response with Neoadjuvant Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Fol-lowed by Paclitaxel with Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab in Patients with HER2-Positive Early Stage Breast Cancer: A Single Center Experience. The Oncologist, 22, 139-143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] van Zeeland, M., Westhoff, P., Wauters, C., Bult, P., Werner, A., Laurens, N., et al. (2020) Omission of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Clini-cally Node-Positive Breast Cancer: How Can We Select Patients? The Breast Journal, 26, 1869-1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Eun, N.L., Son, E.J., Gweon, H.M., Kim, J.-A. and Youk, J.H. (2020) Pre-diction of Axillary Response by Monitoring with Ultrasound and MRI during and after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients. European Radiology, 30, 1460-1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Shirzadi, A., Mahmoodzadeh, H. and Qorbani, M. (2019) As-sessment of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer in Two Subgroups: Ini-tially Node Negative and Node Positive Converted to Node Negative—A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 24, Article No. 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Morency, D., Dumitra, S., Parvez, E., Martel, K., Basik, M., Robidoux, A., et al. (2019) Axillary Lymph Node Ultrasound Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Biopsy-Proven Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Results from the SN FNAC Study. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 26, 4337-4345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]