大学治理范式的转变：由冲突走向折中
The Transformation of University Governance Paradigm: From Conflict to Compromise
摘要: 2021年，我国高等教育发展正式进入普及化阶段，呈现出前所未有的蓬勃发展态势。但入学人数的激增与体量扩大同时也为大学带来了管理挑战。高等教育理论界认同大学存在三种典型治理范式：科层范式、学院范式和政治范式。由于大学系统的公共性与复杂性，三种治理范式同时存在于大学环境中，其矛盾很有可能激化形成冲突。本文从组织观的视角对三种治理范式的深层矛盾的逻辑成因、表现形式进行了分析，并针对每一种矛盾形式，综合过往的研究和我国当前国情，总结出理论上的可能调和路径和实践上的调和方案。建议我国大学可以通过建立管理者的科学认知、建立高科学性的智囊团、平衡学校利益相关方需求等方式，进一步有效调和大学治理范式，化解潜在冲突。
Abstract: In 2021, the development of higher education has officially entered the popularization stage, presenting the unprecedented booming development situation. But the surge in enrollment and expansion has also created administrative challenges for universities. The theoretical circles of higher education agree that there are three typical governance paradigms in universities: bureaucratic paradigm, college paradigm and political paradigm. Due to the public nature and complexity of the university system, three governance paradigms exist in the university environment at the same time, and their contradictions are likely to intensify and form conflicts. This paper analyzes the logical cause and manifestation of the three governance paradigms’ deep contradictions from the organizational perspective, and then, aiming at each contradictory form, combining the past research and the current conditions of our country, concludes the possible harmonic path in theory and the practical harmonic solution. It is suggested that Chinese universities can further harmonize university governance paradigm and resolve potential conflicts by establishing administrators’ scientific cognition, establishing highly scientific think tanks and balancing the needs of university stake-holders.
文章引用：刘偌菲, 卢纯青. 大学治理范式的转变：由冲突走向折中[J]. 教育进展, 2023, 13(2): 634-640. https://doi.org/10.12677/AE.2023.132104

参考文献

[1] 林杰. 美国院校组织理论中的科层制模型——以斯特鲁普的理论为原型[J]. 北京大学教育评论, 2009, 7(2): 143-161+192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[2] 马克斯•韦伯. 经济与社会. 第一卷[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2010.
[3] Veblen, T. (1957) The Higher Education in America: A Memorandum on the Conduct of Universities by Business Man. Sagamore Press, New York, 62.
[4] Stroup, H.H. (1966) Bureaucracy in Higher Education. Free Press, New York.
[5] Dmillett, J. (1962) The Academic Community: An Essay on Organiza-tion. McGraw-Hill, New York.
[6] 林杰. 美国高校组织理论中的学院模型[J]. 高等教育研究, 2006(7): 93-102.
[7] 林杰. 美国院校组织理论中的政治模型——以鲍德里奇的个案为原型[J]. 高等教育研究, 2007(9): 93-101.
[8] Corwin, R.G. and Baldridge, J.V. (1971) Power and Conflict in the University: Research in the Sociology of Complex Organization. The Journal of Higher Education, 42, 782-783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] Baldridge, J.V. and Deal, T. (1983) Dynamics of Organizational Change in Education. McCutchan Publishing Corporation, Berkeley, 19-32.
[10] Astley, W.G. and Van de Ven, A.H. (1983) Cen-tral Perspectives and Debates in Organization Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 245-273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] Child, J. (1972) Organization Structure, Environments and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice. Sociology, 6, 1-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[12] Benson, J.K. (1975) The Interorganizational Network as Political Economy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 229-250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[13] Salaman, G. (1978) Towards a Sociology of Organizational Structure. The Sociological Review, 26, 519-553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[14] Cohen, M.D., March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1972) A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1-25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[15] 张继明. 我国高等教育治理现代化的核心要素及其优化[J]. 现代教育管理, 2020(6): 7-13.

为你推荐