多发性骨髓瘤自体干细胞移植预处理方案进展
Progress in Conditioning Regimen for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma
摘要: 多发性骨髓瘤是血液系统第二大恶性肿瘤,新药来临之后多发性骨髓瘤患者治疗效果较好,但终面临复发风险。对于符合移植条件的患者来说自体干细胞移植仍是主要治疗方案。预处理是自体干细胞移植的重要过程,大剂量马法兰是现在主流的预处理方案。本文从马法兰用量、种类、马法兰联合其他药物几方面来概述了多发性骨髓瘤自体干细胞移植预处理方案进展。结论:预处理方案需做到有效性和安全性二者兼顾。以马法兰为基础的联合用药方案虽显示出患者可能获益,但实验样本量较少,需要进一步验证。目前MM患者预处理方案仍是推荐马法兰(200 mg/m2),对于年龄大于65~70岁以上或肾功能不全(肾小球滤过率低于60 ml/min)患者可减为140 mg/m2
Abstract: Multiple myeloma is the second most common malignant tumor of the hematologic system, and pa-tients with multiple myeloma respond well to treatment after the advent of new drugs, but eventu-ally face the risk of relapse. Autologous stem cell transplantation remains the mainstay of treat-ment for patients eligible for transplantation. Transplantation conditioning is an important process in autologous stem cell transplantation, and high-dose melphalan is now the mainstream trans-plantation conditioning regimen. In this paper, the progress of transplantation conditioning regi-men of autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma is summarized from the aspects of melphalan dosage, type, melphalan combined with other drugs. Conclusion: Transplantation con-ditioning regimen should be combined with efficacy and safety. Although melphalan based combi-nation regimens have shown possible benefits, the experimental sample size is small and requires further validation. At present, the conditioning regimen for MM patients is still recommended mel-phalan (200 mg/m2), which can be reduced to 140 mg/m2 for patients older than 65~70 years or with renal insufficiency (glomerular filtration rate less than 60 ml/min).
文章引用:何瑜, 罗云. 多发性骨髓瘤自体干细胞移植预处理方案进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2023, 13(2): 2563-2568. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2023.132362

参考文献

[1] Cowan, A.J., Green, D.J., Kwok, M., et al. (2022) Diagnosis and Management of Multiple Myeloma: A Review. JAMA, 327, 464-477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Ali, M.O. and Al Hadidi, S. (2022) High Dose (Condi-tioning) Regimens Used Prior to Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma. Transplantation and Cel-lular Therapy, 28, 572-580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Garderet, L., Beohou, E., Caillot, D., et al. (2016) Upfront Autolo-gous Stem Cell Transplantation for Newly Diagnosed Elderly Multiple Myeloma Patients: A Prospective Multicenter Study. Haematologica, 101, 1390-1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Srour, S.A., Milton, D.R., Bashir, Q., et al. (2021) Melphalan Dose Intensity for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma. Haematologica, 106, 3211-3214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Shaw, P.J., Nath, C.E. and Lazarus, H.M. (2014) Not Too Lit-tle, Not Too Much-Just Right! (Better Ways to Give High Dose Melphalan). Bone Marrow Transplant, 49, 1457-1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Aydin, M., Tang, M.W., Wondergem, M.J., et al. (2022) High-Dose Melphalan in 1 Day versus over 2 Days Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation as Consolidation Treatment in Patients with Multiple Myeloma. British Journal of Haematology, 196, e67-e70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Aljitawi, O.S., Ganguly, S., Abhyankar, S.H., et al. (2014) Phase IIa Cross-Over Study of Propylene Glycol-Free Melphalan (LGD-353) and Alkeran in Multiple Myeloma Autologous Transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant, 49, 1042-1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Monahan, K., Kleman, A., Thapa, B., et al. (2020) Propylene Glycol-Free Melphalan versus PG-Melphalan as Conditioning for Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Myeloma. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 26, 2229-2236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Jung, S.H., Lee, J.J., Kim, J.S., et al. (2018) Phase 2 Study of an Intravenous Busulfan and Melphalan Conditioning Regimen for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Multiple Myeloma (KMM150). Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 24, 923-929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Bashir, Q., Thall, P.F., Milton, D.R., et al. (2019) Conditioning with Busulfan plus Melphalan versus Melphalan Alone before Autologous Haemopoietic Cell Transplantation for Multi-ple Myeloma: An Open-Label, Randomised, Phase 3 Trial. The Lancet Haematology, 6, e266-e275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Gao, F., Lin, M.S., You, J.S., et al. (2021) Long-Term Out-comes of Busulfan plus Melphalan-Based versus Melphalan 200 mg/m2 Conditioning Regimens for Autologous Hema-topoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancer Cell International, 21, Article No. 601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Hagen, P., D’Souza, A., Hari, P., et al. (2020) Busulfan, Mel-phalan, and Bortezomib Compared to Melphalan as a High Dose Regimen for Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma: Long Term Follow Up of a Novel High Dose Regimen. Leukemia & Lymphoma, 61, 3484-3492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Veeraputhiran, M., Jain, T., Deol, A., et al. (2015) BEAM Conditioning Regimen Has Higher Toxicity Compared with High-Dose Melphalan for Salvage Autologous Hematopoi-etic Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma. Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia, 15, 531-535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Farag, S., Bacher, U., Jeker, B., et al. (2022) Adding Bendamustine to Melphalan before ASCT Improves CR Rate in Myeloma vs. Melphalan Alone: A Randomized Phase-2 Trial. Bone Marrow Transplant, 57, 990-997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Gomez-Arteaga, A., Mark, T.M., Guarneri, D., et al. (2019) High-Dose Bendamustine and Melphalan Conditioning for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients with Mul-tiple Myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant, 54, 2027-2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Roussel, M., Moreau, P., Huynh, A., et al. (2010) Bortezomib and High-Dose Melphalan as Conditioning Regimen before Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with de Novo Multiple Myeloma: A Phase 2 Study of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome (IFM). Blood, 115, 32-37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Roussel, M., Lauwers-Cances, V., Macro, M., et al. (2022) Bortezomib and High-Dose Melphalan Conditioning Regimen in Frontline Multiple Myeloma: An IFM Randomized Phase 3 Study. Blood, 139, 2747-2757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Biran, N., Rowley, S.D., Vesole, D.H., et al. (2016) A Phase I/II Study of Escalating Doses of Bortezomib in Conjunction with High-Dose Melphalan as a Conditioning Regimen for Salvage Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Multiple Myeloma. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 22, 2165-2171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Dalla Palma, B., Accardi, F., Prezioso, L., et al. (2020) Combining Bortezomib to High Dose Melphalan as Conditioning Regimen Results in the Improvement of the Response Rate in Newly Diagnosed Young Multiple Myeloma Patients. Leukemia & Lymphoma, 61, 1238-1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Aypar, E., İzzettin, F.V., Akı, Ş.Z., et al. (2018) Comparison of Conditioning Regimen Toxicities among Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Eligible Multiple Myeloma Patients: High-Dose Melphalan versus High-Dose Melphalan and Bortezomib. Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, 24, 281-289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Costa, L.J., Landau, H.J., Chhabra, S., et al. (2018) Phase 1/2 Trial of Carfilzomib plus High-Dose Melphalan Preparative Regimen for Salvage Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Followed by Maintenance Carfilzomib in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma. Bi-ology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 24, 1379-1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]