大学生性别角色与生涯适应力的关系及团体辅导干预
The Relationship between Gender Roles and Career Adaptability of College Students and the Intervention of Group Counseling
摘要: 目的：调查大学生生涯适应力的现状及其相关因素，验证生涯适应力的性别角色“双性化模型”，探究基于生涯适应力六维理论的团体辅导对大学生的生涯适应力的干预效果。方法：1119名大学生参与问卷调查，34名大学生参与干预研究，实验组和对照组各17名，实验组开展8次团体干预，对照组不干预。结果：不同性别在生涯适应力总体水平上不存在显著差异，不同的性别角色类型在生涯适应力总体水平上存在显著差异，且双性化类型被试的生涯适应力总分显著高于其余所有类型被试得分；干预后，实验组后测的得分显著高于前测，对照组前测后测无显著性差异，实验组前后测生涯适应力总分差量显著高于对照组差量。结论：影响大学生生涯适应力的是性别角色，而不是性别，且双性化类型大学生的生涯适应力水平最高；基于生涯适应力六维理论的团体辅导能够提高非双性化类型大学生的生涯适应力。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the current situation and related factors of college students’ career adaptability, verify the gender role “androgynous model” of career adaptability, and explore the intervention effect of group counseling based on the six-dimensional theory of career adaptability on college students’ career adaptability. Methods: 1119 college students participated in the questionnaire survey, and 34 college students participated in the intervention study, with 17 students in the experimental group and 17 students in the control group. The experimental group conducted 8 group interventions, while the control group did not. Results: There was no significant difference between different sexes in the overall level of career adaptation, but there was a significant difference between different gender role types in the overall level of career adaptation, and the total score of the androgynous type was significantly higher than that of all other types of subjects. After the intervention, the score of the experimental group in the post-test was significantly higher than that in the pre-test, while there was no significant difference in the pre-test and post-test in the control group. The total difference of the experimental group in the post-test career adaptability was significantly higher than that in the control group. Conclusions: It is gender role, not sex, that affects the career adaptability of college students, and androgynous college students have the highest level of career adaptability. Group counseling based on the six-dimensional theory of career adaptability can improve the career adaptability of non-androgynous college students.
文章引用：贺立竞, 王亭月 (2023). 大学生性别角色与生涯适应力的关系及团体辅导干预. 心理学进展, 13(2), 592-601. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2023.132074

参考文献

[1] 卞国玉(2011). 高二学生性别角色与心理健康、适应性的关系及对策研究. 硕士学位论文, 长春: 东北师范大学.
[2] 陈皓(2013). 医科大学生生涯适应力的现状及干预. 硕士学位论文, 太原: 山西医科大学.
[3] 陈妮莎(2021). 高中生生涯适应力的现状特征及生涯课程的教育干预研究. 硕士学位论文, 重庆: 西南大学.
[4] 崔红, 王登峰(2005). 性别角色类型与心理社会适应的关系研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 13(4), 411-413.
[5] 杜欣(2015). 大学生性别角色、自尊与适应状况的关系研究. 硕士学位论文, 石家庄: 河北师范大学.
[6] 樊富珉(2015). 结构式团体辅导与咨询应用实例. 高等教育出版社.
[7] 关翩翩, 李敏(2015). 生涯建构理论: 内涵, 框架与应用. 心理科学进展, 23(12), 2177-2186.
[8] 侯春娜, 王亚楠(2020). 公费师范生生涯适应力的干预研究. 林区教学, (5), 102-105.
[9] 金辉(2008). 大学生性别角色,自尊及学习适应的关系研究. 硕士学位论文, 广州: 华南师范大学.
[10] 林晖芸(2016). 生涯团体辅导对提升师范生生涯适应力及职业认同感的作用. 重庆科技学院学报: 社会科学版, (11), 114-117.
[11] 刘电芝, 黄会欣, 贾凤芹, 龚茜, 黄颀, 李霞(2011). 新编大学生性别角色量表揭示性别角色变迁. 心理学报, 43(6), 639-649.
[12] 刘薇薇(2016). 内观疗法对大学生生涯适应力的干预研究. 硕士学位论文, 苏州: 苏州大学.
[13] 罗兰, 龚放华(2019). 应用职业生涯团体辅导提升新护士生涯适应力的干预研究. 中国护理管理, 19(2), 220-224.
[14] 马逸伦(2012). 大学生生涯适应力及生涯辅导研究. 硕士学位论文, 南宁: 广西大学.
[15] 梅晓菁(2007). 高中生性别角色双性化与社会适应性的关系. 硕士学位论文, 上海: 华东师范大学.
[16] 宋才发(2020). 在常态化疫情防控中不懈推进脱贫攻坚. 经济与社会发展, 18(3), 1-9.
[17] 孙啸晨(2014). 高中生性别角色教育及其教育价值初探. 硕士学位论文, 北京: 首都师范大学.
[18] 王欢欢(2018). 高职学生主动性人格、生涯阻碍知觉和生涯适应力的关系及干预研究. 硕士学位论文, 重庆: 重庆师范大学.
[19] 王元元, 欧晓霞, 时勘(2019). 大学生性别角色对生涯适应力的影响: 社会能力的中介作用. 潍坊学院学报, 19(4), 90-94.
[20] 王中会, 王晶(2013). 女大学生性别角色、性别观念与大学适应的关系. 心理与行为研究, 11(1), 102-109.
[21] 吴填, 王笃强(2020). 积极心理学取向的残障大学生生涯适应力团体辅导研究. 社会工作与管理, 20(1), 60-65.
[22] 姚玲玉(2018). 大学生核心自我评价与生涯适应力的关系: 成就动机的中介作用. 硕士学位论文, 南京: 南京师范大学.
[23] 余小芳(2004). 性别角色的鉴定及其与心理健康、社会适应的关系研究. 硕士学位论文, 南昌: 江西师范大学.
[24] 张孟(2020). 大学生生涯适应力对择业焦虑的影响. 硕士学位论文, 石家庄: 河北师范大学.
[25] 张夕汉(2014). 大学生生涯适应力及其与认知加工特点的关系研究. 硕士学位论文, 武汉: 中国地质大学.
[26] 赵小云(2011). 大学生生涯适应力研究. 博士学位论文, 南京: 南京师范大学.
[27] 赵小云, 郭成(2010). 国外生涯适应力研究述评. 心理科学进展, 18(9), 1503-1510.
[28] 赵小云, 谭顶良, 郭成(2015). 大学生生涯适应力问卷的编制. 中国心理卫生杂志, 29(6), 463-468.
[29] 周浩, 龙立荣(2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-942.
[30] 周颖(2017). 生涯建构咨询对低生涯适应力大学生的干预研究. 硕士学位论文, 苏州: 苏州大学.
[31] Bem, S. L. (1974). The Measurement of Psychological Androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162.[CrossRef] 
[32] Goodman, J. (1994). Career Adaptability in Adults: A Construct Whose Time Has Come. The Career Development Quarterly, 43, 74-84.[CrossRef] 
[33] Pratzner, F. C., & Ashley, W. L. (1985). Occupational Adaptability and Transferable Skills: Preparing Today’s Adults for Tomorrow’s Careers. In C. H. Shulman (Ed.), Adults and the Changing Workplace: 1985 Year Book of the American Vocational Association (pp. 13-22). American Vocational Association.
[34] Rottinghaus, P. J., Day, S. X., & Borgen, F. H. (2005). The Career Futures Inventory: A Measure of Career-Related Adaptability and Optimism. Journal of Career Assessment, 13, 3-24.[CrossRef] 
[35] Savickas, M. L. (1997). Career Adaptability: An Integrative Construct for Life-Span, Life-Space Theory. The Career Development Quarterly, 45, 247-259.[CrossRef] 
[36] Savickas, M. L. (2005). The Theory and Practice of Career Construction. In S. D. Brown, & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Career Development and Counseling: Putting Theory and Research to Work (pp. 42-70). Wiley.
[37] Savickas, M. L., & Porfeli, E. J. (2012). Career Adapt-Abilities Scale: Construction, Reliability, and Measurement Equivalence across 13 Countries. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 661-673.[CrossRef] 
[38] Spence, J. T. (1984). Gender Identity and Its Implications for the Concepts of Masculinity and Femininity. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 32, 59-95.
[39] Super, D. E., & Knasel, E. G. (1981). Career Development in Adulthood: Some Theoretical Problems and a Possible Solution. British Journal of Guidance & Counseling, 9, 194-201.[CrossRef] 
[40] Terman, L. M., & Miles, C. C. (1936). Sex and Personality: Studies in Masculinity and Femininity. McGraw-Hill.[CrossRef]