页岩气优质储层预测与评价
Shale Gas Quality Reservoir Prediction and Evaluation
DOI: 10.12677/AG.2023.132013, PDF,   
作者: 张正玉, 任 杰, 董 震:中石化经纬有限公司西南测控公司,四川 成都
关键词: 页岩气储层参数测井资料甜点预测Shale Gas Reservoir Parameters Logging Data Dessert Prediction
摘要: 现今页岩气勘探深度已经超过4000 m,标志着非常规油气勘探越来越成为焦点。但对LM地区勘探实践表明,不同构造位置不同埋深的水平井产能差异较大,并与裂缝发育程度、页岩含气性及岩石物理参数切相关。因此通过对原始测井纵波速度、横波速度和密度等参数进行预处理,基于常规测井资料对孔隙度、脆性指数、TOC等属性计算,并采用基于深度学习的组合预测模型对LM勘探区不同埋深带的优质页岩储层进行评价。研究结果表明:1) 低频和高频信息约束下,结合地震数据空间分布特征的混合深度学习网络结构,能实现高分辨率波阻抗反演,为页岩孔隙度预测打下基础;2) 在体曲率属性、蚂蚁追踪属性及相干属性提取的基础上,结合竞争神经网络的优势进行属性融合对减少构造解释的多解性具有重要作用;3) 建立了可靠的深度学习组合预测模型,完成研究区地质“甜点”精细化预测,克服了单一指标进行预测的多解性,并且本文将预测结果与实际测井解释的分类结果进行对比,匹配度较高,证明了该方法的准确性和有效性。
Abstract: Nowadays, the depth of shale gas exploration has exceeded 4000m, marking that unconventional oil and gas exploration is becoming more and more focal. However, the exploration practice in LM area shows that the production capacity of horizontal wells with different burial depths in different tectonic locations varies greatly and is related to the degree of fracture development, gas content of shale and petrophysical parameters. Therefore, by pre-processing parameters such as longitudinal wave velocity, transverse wave velocity and density of original logs, calculating porosity, brittleness index, TOC and other attributes based on conventional logging data, and using a combined prediction model based on depth learning to evaluate high-quality shale reservoirs in different burial depth zones of LM exploration area. The results show that: 1) a hybrid deep learning network structure combining both low-frequency and high-frequency information constraints with the spatial distribution characteristics of seismic data can achieve high-resolution wave impedance inversion and lay the foundation for shale porosity prediction; 2) on the basis of body curvature attributes, ant-tracking attributes and 3D ground stress prediction, combining the advantages of competitive neural networks for attribute fusion is important to reduce the multi-solution of tectonic interpretation; 3) a reliable deep learning combination prediction model is established to complete the geological “sweet spot” refinement prediction in the study area, which overcomes the multi-solution nature of single-indicator prediction, and the prediction results are compared with the classification results of actual logging interpretation in this paper, and the matching degree is high, which proves the accuracy and effectiveness of this method.
文章引用:张正玉, 任杰, 董震. 页岩气优质储层预测与评价[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2023, 13(2): 136-155. https://doi.org/10.12677/AG.2023.132013

参考文献

[1] 钟城, 秦启荣, 周吉羚, 等. 川东南丁山地区龙马溪组富有机质页岩脆性评价[J]. 地质科技情报, 2018, 37(4): 167-174.
[2] 何顺, 秦启荣, 范存辉, 等. 川东南丁山地区页岩气保存条件分析[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(2): 24-31.
[3] 朱梦月, 秦启荣, 李虎, 等. 川东南DS地区龙马溪组页岩裂缝发育特征及主控因素[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2017, 24(6): 54-59.
[4] 范存辉, 李虎, 钟城, 等. 川东南丁山构造龙马溪组页岩构造裂缝期次及演化模式[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(4): 379-390.
[5] 温真桃. 丁山地区页岩气规模开发的约束条件及措施[J]. 天然气技术与经济, 2017, 11(1): 12-15.
[6] 黎小伟, 范久霄, 刘明汐, 等. 相干体解释断层方法测试及泾河油田的应用[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2015, 31(12): 65-70.
[7] 刘传虎. 地震相干分析技术在裂缝油气藏预测中的应用[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2001(2): 238-244.
[8] 朱兆林, 赵爱国. 裂缝介质的纵波方位AVO反演研究[J]. 石油物探, 2005(5): 499-503.
[9] 胡伟光, 蒲勇, 肖伟, 等. 裂缝预测技术在清溪场地区的应用[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2010, 15(6): 52-58.
[10] 闫存章, 黄玉珍, 葛春梅, 等. 页岩气是潜力巨大的非常规天然气资源[J]. 天然气工业, 2009, 29(5): 1-6.
[11] 黄玉珍, 黄金亮, 葛春梅, 等. 技术进步是推动美国页岩气快速发展的关键[J]. 天然气工业, 2009, 29(5): 7-10.
[12] 邹才能, 董大忠, 王社教, 等. 中国页岩气形成机理、地质特征及资源潜力[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2010, 37(6): 641-653.
[13] 梁兴, 王高成, 徐政语, 等. 中国南方海相复杂山地页岩气储层甜点综合评价技术——以昭通国家级页岩气示范区为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2016, 36(1): 33-42.
[14] 黄仁春, 魏祥峰, 王强. 四川盆地东南缘丁山地区页岩气成藏富集的关键控制因素[J]. 海相油气地质, 2017, 22(2): 25-30.
[15] 赖富强, 罗涵, 覃栋优, 等. 基于层次分析法的页岩气储层可压裂性评价研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2018, 25(3): 154-159.
[16] 严伟, 刘帅, 冯明刚, 等. 四川盆地丁山区块页岩气储层关键参数测井评价方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(3): 95-104.
[17] 钟光海, 陈丽清, 廖茂杰, 等. 页岩气储层品质测井综合评价[J]. 天然气工业, 2020, 40(2): 54-60.
[18] 郭彤楼, 刘若冰. 复杂构造区高演化程度海相页岩气勘探突破的启示——以四川盆地东部盆缘JY1井为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(4): 643-651.
[19] 石文睿, 张超谟, 张占松, 等. 涪陵页岩气田焦石坝页岩气储层含气量测井评价[J]. 测井技术, 2015, 39(3): 357-362.
[20] 邹才能, 董大忠, 王玉满, 等. 中国页岩气特征、挑战及前景(一) [J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(6): 689-701.
[21] 董大忠, 王玉满, 李新景, 等. 中国页岩气勘探开发新突破及发展前景思考[J]. 天然气工业, 2016, 36(1): 19-32.
[22] Li, K., Yin, X. and Zong, Z. (2017) Pre-Stack Bayesian Cascade AVA Inversion in Complex-Laplace Domain and Its Application to the Broadband Data Acquired at East China. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 158, 751-765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Pan, X., Zhang, G. and Cui, Y. (2020) Matrix-Fluid-Fracture Decoupled-Based Elastic Impedance Variation with Angle and Azimuth Inversion for Fluid Modulus and Fracture Weaknesses. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 189, Article ID: 106974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] 乐友喜, 袁全社. 支持向量机方法在储层预测中的应用[J]. 石油物探, 2005(4): 388-392.