济阳坳陷孤西潜山分布特征及其控因
Distribution Characteristics and Controlling Factors of Guxi Buried Hill in Jiyang Depression
DOI: 10.12677/AG.2023.132016, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 张 波:中国石油化工股份有限公司胜利油田分公司勘探开发研究院,山东 东营
关键词: 济阳坳陷孤西潜山地质特征构造演化Jiyang Depression Guxi Buried Hill Geological Features Tectonic Evolution
摘要: 多期构造运动作用的叠加造成孤西潜山地质条件非常复杂,制约了研究区油气勘探进程。为指导下一步油气勘探,利用丰富的钻井、地震资料,对潜山分布特征及其控因进行了研究。结果表明,孤西潜山带由高潜山与低潜山2类潜山组成,其中高潜山埋藏相对较浅,上覆地层主要是新近系,低潜山埋藏深度一般在3500 m以上,上覆地层为古近系。各潜山高点均分布在南西部位,古生界残留地层主要分布在NW向断层下盘,中生界主要分布在NW向断层上盘。印支运动时期,逆断层上盘古生界剥蚀强烈,下盘古生界保留相对完整,燕山运动早中时期,逆断层回返控制了中生界沉积,厚度中心位于断层下降盘,燕山运动晚期研究区整体隆升,中生界遭受剥蚀,喜山运动时期形成的近EW向、NNE向断层控制了潜山差异沉降,断层上盘下降深埋而形成低潜山,断层下盘相对隆升,中古生界继续遭受剥蚀形成高潜山。
Abstract: The geological conditions of Guxi buried hill are very complicated due to the superimposition of multi-stage tectonic movements, which restricts the exploration process of oil and gas in the study area. In order to guide the next oil and gas exploration, the distribution characteristics and controlling factors of the buried hill are studied by using abundant drilling and seismic data. The results show that the Guxi buried hill is composed of high buried hill and low buried hill. The high buried hills are relatively shallow, and the overlying strata are mainly Neogene. The buried depth of the low buried hills is generally over 3,500 m, the overlying strata are Paleogene. The high points of all buried hills are distributed in the south-west, and the Paleozoic residual strata are mainly distributed in the foot-wall of the NW-trending fault, while the Mesozoic strata are mainly distributed in the hanging-wall of the NW-trending fault. During the Indosinian movement, the Paleozoic strata were strongly eroded in the upper plate of the reverse fault, and the Paleozoic strata in the lower plate were preserved relatively intact. During the early and middle period of the Yan-Mountains movement, the reverse fault returned and controlled the Mesozoic sediments, the study area was uplifted and the Mesozoic was denuded in the later Yan-Mountains movement. Near EW-trending and NNE-trending faults formed during the Himalayan movement, which controlled the differential subsidence of the buried hill. The hanging-wall of the fault dropped and buried deeply to form low buried hill. The foot-wall of the fault rose relatively, and the Mesozoic and the Paleozoic strata continued to be eroded to form high buried hill.
文章引用:张波. 济阳坳陷孤西潜山分布特征及其控因[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2023, 13(2): 178-183. https://doi.org/10.12677/AG.2023.132016

参考文献

[1] 张波. 渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷孤北潜山下古生界油气来源及运移方向[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(6): 981-988.
[2] 王永诗, 彭传圣, 姜素华, 等. 孤西断裂带下古生界褶皱–块断型潜山油气成藏模式[J]. 中国海洋大学学报, 2005, 25(4): 665-669.
[3] 马立驰, 王永诗, 景安语. 渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷隐蔽潜山油藏新发现及其意义[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(1): 13-18.
[4] 宋明水, 王惠勇, 张云银. 济阳坳陷潜山“挤–拉–滑”成山机制及油气藏类型划分[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(4): 1-8.
[5] 常国贞, 毕彩芹, 林红梅. 低潜山反转构造演化、成藏体系与勘探——以胜利油区孤北低潜山为例[J]. 断块油气田, 2002, 9(5): 19-23, 90.
[6] 吴智平, 李伟, 任拥军, 林畅松. 济阳坳陷中生代盆地演化及其与新生代盆地叠合关系探讨[J]. 地质学报, 2003, 77(2): 280-288
[7] 侯贵廷. 钱祥麟. 蔡东升. 渤海中、新生代盆地构造活动与沉积作用的时空关系[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2000, 21(3): 201-206.
[8] 任建业, 于建国, 张俊霞. 济阳坳陷深层构造及其对中新生代盆地发育的控制作用[J]. 地学前缘, 2009, 16(4): 117-137
[9] Li, J.H., Zhang, Y., Dong, S.W. and Shi, W. (2013) Structural and Geochronological Constraints on the Mesozoic Tectonic Evolution of the North Dabashan Zone, South Qinling, Central China. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 64, 99-114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Li, S.Z., Kusky, T.M., Wang, L., et al. (2007) Collision Leading to Multiple-Stage Large-Scale Extrusion in the Qinling Orogen: Insights from the Mianlue Suture. Gondwana Research, 12, 121-143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 兰浩圆, 李三忠, 李玺瑶, 等. 华北东部印支期变形特征: 对大陆深俯冲极性的启示[J]. 地学前沿, 2017, 24(4): 185-199.
[12] 赵越, 张栓宏, 徐刚, 等. 燕山板内变形带侏罗纪主要构造事件[J]. 地质通报, 2004, 23(9): 854-863.
[13] 董树文, 张岳桥, 龙长兴, 等. 中国侏罗纪构造变革与燕山运动新诠释[J]. 地质学报, 2007, 81(11): 1449-1461.
[14] 朱光, 刘程, 顾承串, 等. 郯庐断裂带晚中生代演化对西太平洋俯冲历史的指示[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2018, 48(4): 415-435.
[15] 吴智平, 侯旭波, 李伟. 华北东部地区中生代盆地格局及演化过程探讨[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2007, 31(4): 385-399.
[16] 侯旭波, 吴智平, 李伟. 济阳坳陷中生代负反转构造发育特征[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 34(1): 18-23, 28.
[17] 朱日祥, 陈凌, 吴福元, 刘俊来. 华北克拉通破坏的时间、范围与机制[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2011, 41(5): 583-592.