经肛管不能预防直肠癌术后吻合口漏的发生:一项关于前瞻性研究的meta分析
Transanal Tube Does Not Prevent Postoperative Anastomotic Leak in Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2023.132377, PDF,   
作者: 姚倩云, 王 婕, 陈思言:西安医学院,陕西 西安;姬新才*:陕西省人民医院,陕西 西安
关键词: 吻合口渗漏经肛管直肠癌手术Anastomotic Leak Transanal Tube Rectal Cancer Surgery
摘要: 经肛管(TT)是否能减少术后吻合口漏(AL)尚存在争议;我们研究的目的是比较直肠癌手术后放置TT和不放置TT的有效性和安全性。通过计算机检索PubMed和其他数据库中关于肛门导管预防直肠癌AL的文章:检索时限从建库到2022年2月28日。根据设定的标准,选择文献并提取相关数据,使用Review Manager 5.2和Stata 12.0软件进行数据分析。最终共纳入9项研究(2748名患者),3项为随机对照试验(RCTs),其余6项是前瞻性队列研究。在RCTs研究(OR, 0.67; 95%CI 0.39~1.13; P = 0.13)和前瞻性研究中(OR, 0.64; 95%CI 0.37~1.08; P = 0.09),TT组和NTT组间的术后AL的发生率无明显的统计学差异。在RCTs的亚组分析中,TT组的再手术率(OR, 0.11; 95%CI 0.03~0.51; P = 0.004)及住院天数(OR, −3.40; 95%CI (−4.89, −1.91); P < 0.00001)优于NTT组;而在前瞻性研究中,2组间的死亡率(OR, 0.74; 95%CI 0.16~3.36; P = 0.70)、再手术率(OR, 0.72; 95%CI 0.37~1.42; P = 0.34)及住院天数(OR, −1.57; 95%CI −3.73~0.60; P = 0.16)均无统计学差异。这项meta分析表明,无论是RCTs研究还是前瞻性研究,TT组并未改善术后AL的发生率,未来需要更多的大型多中心研究进一步验证。
Abstract: Whether transanal catheters (TT) reduce postoperative anastomotic leakage (AL) is controversial; the aim of our study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of TT placement with and without TT placement after rectal cancer surgery. PubMed and other databases were searched by computer for articles on anal catheters for the prevention of AL in rectal cancer: the search period was from the date of database creation to 28 February 2022. The literature was selected and relevant data were extracted according to the set criteria, and data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.2 and Stata 12.0 software. A total of nine studies (2748 patients) were ultimately included: three were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and the remaining six were prospective cohort studies. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of postoperative AL between the TT and NTT groups in the RCTs (OR, 0.67; 95%CI 0.39~1.13; P = 0.13) and in the prospective studies (OR, 0.64; 95%CI 0.37~1.08; P = 0.09). In a subgroup analysis of RCTs, the reoperation rate (OR, 0.11; 95%CI 0.03~0.51; P = 0.004) and hospital days (OR, −3.40; 95%CI (−4.89, −1.91); P < 0.00001) were better in the TT group than in the NTT group; whereas in the prospective study, the mortality rate between the 2 groups (OR, 0.74. 95%CI 0.16~3.36; P = 0.70), reoperation rate (OR, 0.72; 95%CI 0.37~1.42; P = 0.34) and days in hospital (OR, −1.57; 95%CI −3.73~0.60; P = 0.16) were not statistically different between the 2 groups in the prospective study. This meta-analysis suggests that the TT group did not improve the incidence of postoperative AL in either RCTs or prospective studies, and further validation in more large multicentre studies is needed in the future.
文章引用:姚倩云, 王婕, 陈思言, 姬新才. 经肛管不能预防直肠癌术后吻合口漏的发生:一项关于前瞻性研究的meta分析[J]. 临床医学进展, 2023, 13(2): 2675-2685. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2023.132377

参考文献

[1] Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R.L., et al. (2021) Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71, 209-249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Westerduin, E., Borstlap, W.A., Musters, G.D., et al. (2018) Redo Co-loanal Anastomosis for Anastomotic Leakage after Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: An Analysis of 59 Cases. Colorectal Disease: The Official Journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 20, 35-43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Zeman, M., Czarnecki, M., Chmielarz, A., et al. (2020) Assessment of the Risk of Permanent Stoma after Low Anterior Resection In Rectal Cancer Patients. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 18, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Jašarović, D., Stojanović, D., Mitrović, N., et al. (2022) Differ-ence in Predictors of Anastomotic Leakage Depending on the Level of Anastomosis after Colorectal Cancer Surgery. Acta Clinica Croatica, 60, 341-346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] McDermott, F.D., Heeney, A., Kelly, M.E., et al. (2015) System-atic Review of Preoperative, Intraoperative and Postoperative Risk Factors for Colorectal Anastomotic Leaks. The British Journal of Surgery, 102, 462-479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Chiarello, M.M., Fransvea, P., Cariati, M., et al. (2022) Anastomotic Leakage in Colorectal Cancer Surgery. Surgical Oncology, 40, Article ID: 101708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Zarnescu, E.C., Zarnescu, N.O. and Costea, R. (2021) Updates of Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage after Colorectal Surgery. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 11, 2382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Xiao, L., Zhang, W., Jiang, P., et al. (2011) Can Transanal Tube Placement after Anterior Resection for Rectal Carcinoma Reduce Anastomotic Leakage Rate? A Single-Institution Pro-spective Randomized Study. World Journal of Surgery, 35, 1367-1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Rack, R.J. (1966) Advantages of an Indwelling Rectal Tube in Anterior Resection and Anastomosis for Lesions Involving the Terminal Portion of the Colon. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, 9, 42-48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Rondelli, F., Avenia, S., De Rosa, M., et al. (2022) Efficacy of a Transanal Drainage Tube versus Diverting Stoma in Protecting Colorectal Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Me-ta-Analysis. Surgery Today, 53, 163-173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Adamova, Z. (2014) Transanal Tube as a Means of Prevention of Anastomotic Leakage after Rectal Cancer Surgery. Viszeralmedizin, 30, 422-426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Li, Y. and Gu, F. (2020) Effectiveness of a Large-Calibre Transanal Drainage Tube on the Prevention of Anastomotic Leakage after Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer. Journal of B.U.O.N.: Official Journal of the Balkan Union of Oncology, 25, 933-938.
[13] Wang, Z., Liang, J., Chen, J., et al. (2020) Effectiveness of a Transanal Drainage Tube for the Prevention of Anastomotic Leakage after Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention: APJCP, 21, 1441-1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Yang, C.-S., Choi, G.-S., Park, J.S., et al. (2016) Rectal Tube Drainage Reduces Major Anastomotic Leakage after Minimally Invasive Rectal Cancer Surgery. Colorectal Disease: The Official Journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 18, O445-O452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Ito, T., Obama, K., Sato, T., et al. (2017) Usefulness of Transanal Tube Placement for Prevention of Anastomotic Leakage Following Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection. Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery, 10, 17-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Kuk, J.C., Lim, D.R. and Shin, E.J. (2021) Effect of Transanal Drainage Tube of Anastomotic Leakage Following Low Anterior Resection without a Defunctioning Stoma for Rectal Cancer. Asian Journal of Surgery, 45, 2639-2644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Goto, S., Hida, K., Kawada, K., et al. (2017) Multicenter Analysis of Transanal Tube Placement for Prevention of Anastomotic Leak after Low Anterior Resection. Journal of Surgical Oncology, 116, 989-995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Tamura, K., Matsuda, K., Horiuchi, T., et al. (2021) Laparoscopic Anterior Resection with or without Transanal Tube for Rectal Cancer Patients—A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. American Journal of Surgery, 222, 606-612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Zhao, S., Zhang, L., Gao, F., et al. (2021) Transanal Drainage Tube Use for Preventing Anastomotic Leakage after Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection in Patients with Rectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surgery, 156, 1151-1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Jadad, A.R., Moore, R.A., Carroll, D., et al. (1996) Assessing the Quality of Reports of Randomized Clinical Trials: Is Blinding Necessary? Controlled Clinical Trials, 17, 1-12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Guyatt, G.H., Oxman, A.D., Vist, G.E., et al. (2008) GRADE: An Emerging Consensus on Rating Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendations. BMJ (Clinical Research ed.), 336, 924-926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Carboni, F., Valle, M., Levi Sandri, G.B., et al. (2020) Transanal Drainage Tube: Alternative Option to Defunctioning Stoma in Rectal Cancer Surgery? Translational Gastro-enterology and Hepatology, 5, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Challine, A., Cazelles, A., Frontali, A., et al. (2020) Does a Transanal Drainage Tube Reduce Anastomotic Leakage? A Matched Cohort Study in 144 Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sphincter-Saving Surgery for Rectal Cancer. Techniques in Coloproctology, 24, 1047-1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Cho, S.H., Lee, I.K., Lee, Y.S., et al. (2021) The Usefulness of Transanal Tube for Reducing Anastomotic Leak in Mid Rectal Cancer: Compared to Diverting Stoma. Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research, 100, 100-108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Kawada, K., Takahashi, R., Hida, K., et al. (2018) Impact of Transanal Drainage Tube on Anastomotic Leakage after Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 33, 337-340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Lee, S.Y., Kim, C.H., Kim, Y.J., et al. (2015) Impact of Anal De-compression on Anastomotic Leakage after Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis. Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery, 400, 791-796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Zhao, W.-T., Hu, F.-L., Li, Y.-Y., et al. (2013) Use of a Transanal Drainage Tube for Prevention of Anastomotic Leakage and Bleeding after Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer. World Journal of Surgery, 37, 227-232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Shigeta, K., Okabayashi, K., Baba, H., et al. (2016) A Me-ta-Analysis of the Use of a Transanal Drainage Tube to Prevent Anastomotic Leakage after Anterior Resection by Dou-ble-Stapling Technique for Rectal Cancer. Surgical Endoscopy, 30, 543-550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Nishigori, H., Ito, M., Nishizawa, Y., et al. (2014) Effectiveness of a Transanal Tube for the Prevention of Anastomotic Leakage after Rectal Cancer Surgery. World Journal of Surgery, 38, 1843-1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Hidaka, E., Ishida, F., Mukai, S., et al. (2015) Efficacy of Transanal Tube for Prevention of Anastomotic Leakage Following Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancers: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a Single Institution. Surgical Endoscopy, 29, 863-867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Zhao, W.-T., Li, N.-N., He, D., et al. (2017) Transanal Tube for the Prevention of Anastomotic Leakage after Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Journal of Surgery, 41, 267-276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Kim, M.-K., Won, D.-Y., Lee, J.-K., et al. (2015) Comparative Study between Transanal Tube and Loop Ileostomy in Low Anterior Resection for Mid Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Single Center Trial. Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research, 88, 260-268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]