河北省潜在蒸散发的气候敏感性
Climate Sensitivity of Potential Evapotranspiration in Hebei Province
DOI: 10.12677/CCRL.2023.122025, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 张殷钦:河北工程大学水利水电学院,河北 邯郸;河北工程大学河北省智慧水利重点实验室,河北 邯郸
关键词: 潜在蒸散量Penman-Monteith公式Beven敏感性系数河北省Potential Evapotranspiration Penman-Monteith Formula Beven Sensitivity Coefficient Hebei Province
摘要: 为揭示河北省潜在蒸散发(ET0)对气象因子的敏感程度,本文基于河北省12个气象站1970~2012年的气象资料,运用Penman-Monteith公式和Beven敏感系数公式,开展了ET0对气象要素的敏感性分析。结果表明:河北省多年平均年ET0值为1007.7 mm,ET0对各气象要素的敏感水平大小分别为:湿度 > 风速 > 日照 > 气温。其中ET0对湿度的敏感系数小于0,而对风速、日照和气温的敏感系数均大于0。从季节上来看,春、秋、冬三季,ET0对风速和湿度比较敏感;夏季,ET0对日照和湿度比较敏感。在空间分布上,河北省东北部地区和西北部地区的ET0分别对气温和风速的敏感性较强;而东南部地区和西南部地区的ET0分别对湿度和日照的敏感性较强。
Abstract: To reveal the sensitivity of potential evapotranspiration (ET0) to meteorological factors in Hebei Province, Penman-Monteith formula and Beven sensitivity coefficient formulae were used to study the sensitivity analysis of ET0 to various meteorological elements based on the meteorological data of 12 stations from 1970 to 2012. Results indicated that the average annual ET0 value of Hebei province was 1007.7 mm in the past 43 years, and the sensitivity level of ET0 to various meteorological elements was humidity > wind speed > sunshine > temperature. The sensitivity coefficient of ET0 to humidity was less than 0, while the sensitivity coefficients of ET0 to wind speed, sunshine and temperature were all greater than 0. On a seasonal scale, ET0 was highly sensitive to wind speed and humidity in spring, autumn and winter. In summer, ET0 was highly sensitive to sunshine and humidity. In terms of spatial distribution, the northeastern region and the northwestern region of Hebei province were highly sensitive to the temperature and wind speed respectively. The southeast and the southwest were sensitive to humidity and sunshine separately.
文章引用:张殷钦. 河北省潜在蒸散发的气候敏感性[J]. 气候变化研究快报, 2023, 12(2): 247-254. https://doi.org/10.12677/CCRL.2023.122025

参考文献

[1] Gong, L., Xu, C., Chen, D., et al. (2006) Sensitivity of the Penman-Monteith Reference Evapotranspiration to Key Cli-matic Variables in the Changjiang (Yangtze River) Basin. Journal of Hydrology, 329, 620-629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Goyal, R.K. (2004) Sensitivity of Evapotranspiration to Global Warming: A Case Study of Arid Zone of Rajasthan India. Agricultural Water Management, 69, 1-11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 刘昌明, 张丹. 中国地表潜在蒸散发敏感性的时空变化特征分析[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(5): 579-588.
[4] 刘小莽, 郑红星, 刘昌明, 等. 海河流域潜在蒸散发的气候敏感性分析[J]. 资源科学, 2009, 31(9): 1470-1476.
[5] 卞瑶, 李兰, 方思达, 等. 1961~2017年中国地区风速时空变化规律研究[J]. 气候变化研究快报, 2022, 11(6): 1088-1095.
[6] Xu, C., Gong, L., Jiang, T., et al. (2006) Analysis of Spatial Distribution and Temporal Trend of Reference Evaportranspiration and Pan Evaporation in Changjiang Catchment. Journal of Hydrology, 327, 81-93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 王新华, 郭美华, 徐中民. 分别利用Hargreaves和PM公式计算西北干旱区ET0的比较[J]. 农业工程学报, 2006(10): 21-25.
[8] Bormann, H. (2011) Sensitivity Analysis of 18 Different Potential Evapotranspiration Models to Observed Climatic Change at German Climate Stations. Climatic Change, 104, 729-753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 肖春柳, 张兰霞, 曹永强, 等. 河北省潜在蒸散量变化特征及主导因子辨析[J]. 水利水电技术, 2019, 50(6): 1-10.
[10] 赵玲玲, 夏军, 王中根, 等. 北京潜在蒸散发量年内-年际的气候变化特征及成因辨识[J]. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(11): 1911-1921.
[11] 杨羽, 王俣浩, 朱瑶, 等. 近40年来四川盆地参考作物蒸散量时空特征分析[J]. 气候变化研究快报, 2022, 11(6): 1033-1040.
[12] 杨林山, 李常斌, 王帅兵, 等. 洮河流域潜在蒸散发的气候敏感性分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(11): 102-109.