精神科老年糖尿病患者护理干预的效果分析
Effect of Nursing Intervention on Senile Diabetes Mellitus Patients in Psychiatric Department
摘要: 目的:讨论精神科老年糖尿病患者护理干预的实际效果。方法:选取我院于2020年至2021年收治的60例精神科老年糖尿病患者作为研究对象,并将其随机分成对照组30例和观察组30例,对照组患者采用常规护理,观察组患者采取有针对性的护理干预,对比两组护理效果。结果:和对照组比较,观察组患者的恢复情况及自我管理能力有明显好转,两组数据对比差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05),观察组患者干预前及干预后的血糖下降幅度比较差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:临床护理干预对精神科老年糖尿病患者进行健康指导和行为干预效果明显,有利于稳定患者的情绪,树立对疾病的信心,提高患者依从性,促进康复,预后良好,值得推广应用。
Abstract:
Objective: To discuss the practical effect of nursing intervention on senile diabetic patients in psychiatric department. Methods: A to-tal of 60 elderly patients with diabetes mellitus admitted to our hospital from 2020 to 2021 were randomly divided into a control group (N = 30) and a observation group (N = 30), the patients in the control group were given routine nursing care, while the patients in the observation group were given targeted nursing intervention, and the nursing effects of the two groups were compared. Re-sults: Compared with the control group, the recovery and self-management ability of the patients in the observation group were significantly improved, and there was a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05), there was significant difference in blood glucose reduction between pre-intervention and post-intervention in the observation group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The effect of clinical nursing intervention on health guidance and behavior intervention of senile diabetic pa-tients in psychiatric department is obvious, which is helpful to stabilize the patients’ emotion, build up their confidence in the disease, improve the patients’ compliance and promote their rehabilita-tion, the prognosis is good and worth popularizing.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
安静. 老年人糖尿病患者基层护理干预的效果分析[J]. 婚育与健康, 2022, 28(6): 35-36.
|
|
[2]
|
张脂英, 阮品东. 临床护理干预对老年精神障碍合并糖尿病患者生活质量的影响[J]. 糖尿病新世界, 2018, 21(10): 97-98.
|
|
[3]
|
陈晓霞, 夏元霞, 王红. 老年精神障碍合并糖尿病患者的临床特点及护理干预[J]. 世界临床医学, 2016, 10(20): 189+192.
|
|
[4]
|
张彦霞. 老年糖尿病患者危险因素及护理对策[J]. 中国伤残医学, 2014(2): 259+260.
|
|
[5]
|
张冬红, 职艳敏, 王剑英. 老年精神障碍合并糖尿病患者的临床特点及护理干预[J]. 职业与健康, 2006, 22(10):
|