骨支架仿生材料不同拓扑结构力学性能的有限元分析
Finite Element Analysis of Mechanical Properties of Different Topologies of Bone Scaffold Biomimetic Materials
摘要: 目的:通过建立骨支架材料再生丝素蛋白、海藻酸钠和生物陶瓷(氧化铝陶瓷)不同拓扑结构的三维有限元模型,探究骨支架仿生材料在压缩、拉伸、扭转时的力学性能的特性。方法:基于材料实验获得仿生材料相关参数,分析三种骨支架材料:骨纤维丝直径为0.50 mm,线条间夹角为30 (M-30˚)、45 (M-45˚)和60 (M-60˚)度,线密度从0.30 (M-3)、0.50 (M-5)到0.70 (M-7)变化时,骨支架在拉伸、压缩和扭转时的力学性能。结果:骨支架材料再生丝素蛋白、海藻酸钠和氧化铝陶瓷在M-5结构下压缩位移有明显差别,在M-3、M-5、M-7、M-30˚、M-45˚和M-60˚模型中压缩、拉伸和扭转性能均随丝线密度增大而减小,随线条间角度增大而增大,并且M-3模型承受压缩、拉伸和扭转的应力均为最大。结论:骨支架材料再生丝素蛋白压缩形变比海藻酸钠和氧化铝陶瓷材料都大,材料拓扑结构不同对压缩、拉伸和扭转力学性能存在明显的影响,为骨支架仿生材料力学性能的应用研究提供理论依据。
Abstract: Objective: To explore the mechanical properties of bone scaffold biomimetic materials during com-pression, stretching and torsion by establishing three-dimensional finite element models of differ-ent topologies of bone scaffold materials regenerating silk fibroin, sodium alginate and bioceramics (alumina ceramics). Methods: Based on the material experiments, the relevant parameters of bio-mimetic materials were obtained, and three bone scaffold materials were analyzed: bone fiber fila-ment diameter was 0.50 mm, the angle between lines was 30 (M-30˚), 45 (M-45˚) and 60 (M-60˚), and the mechanical properties of bone scaffold during tension, compression and torsion were ana-lyzed when the linear density changed from 0.30 (M-3), 0.50 (M-5) to 0.70 (M-7). Results: The com-pression displacement of bone scaffold material regenerated silk fibroin, sodium alginate and alu-mina ceramics was significantly different under the M-5 structure, and the compression, tensile and torsional properties of the M-3, M-5, M-7, M-30˚, M-45˚ and M-60˚ models decreased with the in-crease of filament density and increased with the increase of the angle between lines, and the com-pression, tensile and torsional stresses of the M-3 model were the largest. Conclusion: The compres-sion set of bone scaffold material regenerated silk fibroin is larger than that of sodium alginate and alumina ceramic materials, and the different material topology has obvious effects on the mechani-cal properties of compression, tensile and torsion, which provides a theoretical basis for the appli-cation of mechanical properties of bone scaffold biomimetic materials.
文章引用:金淼, 赵改平, 薛雅茹, 翟海涛, 张萌, 刘泊钧, 韩东晓, 许宇琦, 甘廷杰, 张志豪. 骨支架仿生材料不同拓扑结构力学性能的有限元分析[J]. 建模与仿真, 2023, 12(2): 668-676. https://doi.org/10.12677/MOS.2023.122063

参考文献

[1] 陈岩松, 陈哲, 王硕凡. 骨修复生物材料临床研究进展[J]. 浙江中西医结合杂志, 2018, 28(10): 892-895.
[2] 郝剑, 郝钊. 骨移植材料研究进展[J]. 中国中西医结合外科杂志, 2016, 22(1): 92-94.
[3] Mondschein, R.J., Kanitkar, A., Wil-liams, C.B., et al. (2017) Polymer Structure-Property Requirements for Stereolithographic 3D Printing of Soft Tissue Engineer-ing Scaffolds. Biomaterials, 140, 170-188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Salmoria, G.V., Pereira, R.V., Fredel, M.C., et al. (2018) Proper-ties of PLDLA/Bioglass Scaffolds Produced by Selective Laser Sintering. Polymer Bulletin, 75, 1299-1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Sheikh, Z., Hamdan, N., Ikeda, Y., et al. (2017) Natural Graft Tissues and Synthetic Biomaterials for Periodontal and Alveolar Bone Reconstructive Applications: A Review. Biomaterials Research, 21, 1-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] 王海江, 陈启富. 组织工程支架材料研究进展[J]. 中国现代医生, 2012, 50(1): 27-29.
[7] 邱荣敏, 梁雁. 石墨烯/丝素蛋白复合支架材料及其在组织工程的研究进展[J]. 右江民族医学院学报, 2020, 42(4): 509-511+515.
[8] 黄利. 丝素蛋白仿生组织工程支架的成型, 结构与性能研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 上海: 东华大学, 2020.
[9] Farokhi, M., Mottaghitalab, F., Samani, S., et al. (2018) Silk Fibroin/Hydroxyapatite Com-posites for Bone Tissue Engineering. Biotechnology Advances, 36, 68-91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] 周思佳, 姜文学, 尤佳. 骨缺损修复材料: 现状与需求和未来[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2018, 22(14): 2251-2258.
[11] Zhang, B.G.X., Myers, D.E., Wallace, G.G., et al. (2014) Bioactive Coatings for Orthopaedic Implants-Recent Trends in Development of Implant Coatings. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 15, 11878-11921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] 曹国定, 裴豫琦, 刘军, 李鹏, 刘鹏, 李旭升. 骨缺损修复材料的研究进展[J]. 中国骨伤, 2021, 34(4): 382-388.
[13] 裴葆青, 王田苗, 王军强. 松质骨微观骨小梁结构的生物力学有限元分析[J]. 北京生物医学工程, 2008(2): 120-122.
[14] Palanivelu, S., Van Paepegem, W., Degrieck, J., et al. (2010) Experimental Study on the Axial Crushing Behaviour of Pultruded Composite Tubes. Polymer Testing, 29, 224-234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Zhang, Z., Sun, W., Zhao, Y. and Hou, S. (2018) Crash Wor-thiness of Different Composite Tubes by Experiments and Simulations. Composites Part B: Engineering, 143, 86-95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Abdewi, E.F., Sulaiman, S., Hamouda, A.M.S., et al. (2008) Quasi-Static Axial and Lateral Crushing of Radial Corrugated Composite Tubes. Thin-Walled Structures, 46, 320-332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Zhu, L., Lyu, L., Zhang, X., et al. (2019) Bending Properties of Zig-zag-Shaped 3D Woven Spacer Composites: Experiment and FEM Simulation. Materials, 12, 1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Zhu, L., Zhang, H., Guo, J., et al. (2020) Axial Compression Experiments and Finite Element Analysis of Basalt Fiber/Epoxy Resin Three-Dimensional Tubular Woven Composites. Materials, 13, 2584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] 王莉莎, 罗艳红. 骨科植入物研究成果在国内相关期刊发表文章的数据分析[J]. 中国组织工程研究与临床康复, 2008, 12(27): 5370-5373.
[20] Ji, W.C., Zhang, X.W. and Qiu, Y.S. (2016) Selected Suitable Seed Cell, Scaffold and Growth Factor Could Maximize the Repair Effect Using Tissue Engineering Method in Spinal Cord Injury. World Journal of Experimental Medicine, 6, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] 刘家利, 索海瑞, 杨翰, 王玲, 徐铭恩. 填充结构对3D打印聚己内酯支架力学性能的影响[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2022, 26(16): 2492-2497.
[22] 廖欣宇, 王福科, 王国梁. 骨组织工程支架的进展与挑战[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2021, 25(28): 4553.