催收非法债务罪的检视探析与司法适用
Review and Analysis of the Crime of Collecting Illegal Debt and Its Judicial Application
摘要: 自《刑法修正案(十一)》颁布以来,催收非法债务罪便成为了学界与实务界持续关注的对象。不同于寻衅滋事罪,催收非法债务罪在犯罪动机方面事出有因而非随意、任意,在法益侵害方面对人身法益的侵害更为显著。为了防止实践中迎合新罪设立而扩大适用的倾向,需要对催收非法债务罪进行限缩思考,以实质性解释为路径指引,将法益损害轻微的催收行为作为出罪事由,在行为认定的过程中关注人身法益的同时兼顾公共秩序法益,多层次厘定非法债务的实然范围,以期达到立法规制的原意。
Abstract:
Since the promulgation of the 11th Amendment to the Criminal Law, the crime of collecting illegal debts has become the object of continuous attention of the academic and practical circles. Different from the crime of picking quarrels and provoking troubles, the crime of collecting illegal debt has cause in the aspect of criminal motive rather than random and arbitrary, and the infringement of personal legal interest is more significant in the aspect of legal interest infringe-ment. In order to prevent the tendency of expanding the application to meet the establishment of new crimes in practice, it is necessary to think about the crime of collection of illegal debts in a lim-ited way. Guided by the path of substantive interpretation, the collection behavior with slight legal interest damage should be taken as the cause of crime. In the process of behavior identification, the real scope of illegal debts should be determined at multiple levels by paying attention to the inter-ests of personal law while taking into account the interests of public order law, in order to achieve the original intention of legislative regulation.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
张明楷. 增设新罪的观念——对积极刑法观的支持[J]. 现代法学, 2020, 42(5): 150-166.
|
|
[2]
|
刘宪权, 黄楠. 最新刑法修正案司法适用疑难问题研究[J]. 法学杂志, 2021, 42(9): 1-16.
|
|
[3]
|
周光权. 论通过增设轻罪实现妥当的处罚——积极刑法立法观的再阐释[J]. 比较法研究, 2020(6): 40-53.
|
|
[4]
|
汪鹏. 场域性立法背景下催收非法债务罪的规范构造[J]. 上海大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 39(1): 91-104.
|
|
[5]
|
张明楷. 妥善对待维权行为避免助长违法犯罪[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2020(5): 3-19.
|
|
[6]
|
杨万明. 《刑法修正案(十一)》条文及其配套《罪名补充规定(七)》理解与适用[M]. 北京: 人民法院出版社, 2021: 311.
|
|
[7]
|
张明楷. 催收非法债务罪的另类解释[J]. 政法论坛, 2022, 40(2): 3-17.
|
|
[8]
|
王红举. 非法催收贷款行为的刑法规制[J]. 法学杂志, 2019, 40(3): 60-66.
|
|
[9]
|
彭辅顺. 催收非法债务罪的正当性与边界[J]. 法治论坛, 2021(4): 345-353.
|
|
[10]
|
陈洪兵. “情节严重”的解释误区及立法反思[J]. 湖南大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 33(3): 147-155.
|
|
[11]
|
吴情树. 催收非法债务罪研究[J]. 法治现代化研究, 2021, 5(5): 89-101.
|
|
[12]
|
李川. 寻衅滋事罪情节犯的属性认定与限缩适用探究——以拟制抽象危险犯为视角切入[J]. 法学, 2015(12): 145-153.
|
|
[13]
|
陶建平. 高利贷行为刑事规制层次论析[J]. 法学, 2018(5): 180-192.
|
|
[14]
|
刘艳红. 遵循立法目的准确界定催收非法债务犯罪[N]. 检察日报, 2022-5-14(003).
|
|
[15]
|
张平寿. 催收非法债务罪的限缩适用与路径选择[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2022, 1(1): 158-176.
|