中美校园凌辱行为刑法规制差异分析
The Analysis on the Difference of Criminal Law Regulation of Campus Bullying between China and the United States
摘要: 校园凌辱行为是中美两国所面临的共同问题,而对校园凌辱行为的概念与特征,中美双方的认识并不完全一致。从刑法学角度而言,对校园凌辱行为的规制就是对未成年人犯罪问题的规制。对于中美校园凌辱行为刑法规制差异分析以实体与程序的分类作为起点展开,在此基础上细化为罪名、量刑、庭审设置、刑罚理念等具体差异分析。通过分析差异得出中美双方对校园凌辱行为规制的独特优势,对进一步完善我国校园凌辱行为的刑法规制提出借鉴建议。
Abstract:
Campus bullying is a common problem faced by China and the United States. However, the concept and characteristics of campus bullying are not completely consistent between China and the United States. In the sense of criminal law, the essence of campus bullying crime is juvenile crime. For the difference analysis of criminal law regulation of campus abuse between China and the United States, the classification of entity and procedure is taken as the starting point, and on this basis, it is subdivided into the spe-cific difference analysis of accusation, sentencing, court setting, penalty concept and so on. Through the analysis of the differences, this paper concludes the unique advantages of the regulation of campus abuse between China and the United States, and puts forward some suggestions for further improving the criminal law regulation of campus abuse in China.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
李鑫. 美国青少年校园欺凌治理的多层路径解析[J]. 警学研究, 2020(2): 89-99.
|
|
[2]
|
王志祥, 王艺丹. 校园欺凌问题的刑法治理探析[J]. 中国青年研究, 2018(7): 95-100+48.
|
|
[3]
|
栾时春, 张明泽. 未成年人犯罪量刑规则中“必减主义”之检讨——规范和实证角度的求证[J]. 青少年犯罪问题, 2012(4): 51-57.
|
|
[4]
|
胡云腾. 论全国依法治国背景下少年法庭的改革与发展——基于域外少年司法制度比较研究[J]. 中国青年社会科学, 2016(1): 115-123.
|
|
[5]
|
姚建龙, 孙鉴. 触法行为干预与二元结构少年司法制度之设计[J]. 浙江社会科学, 2017, 248(4): 41-50+157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|