论著作权法中的归复权制度
On the Right of Return System in Copyright Law
摘要: 在著作权交易市场上,创作者通常将作品的商业利用通过著作权合同交由相对方安排,从而获得经济利益。然而,由于创作者与传播者在经济地位和交易经验上的差异,加之传播者拥有控制传播渠道和传播技术的先天优势,造成部分创作者的合同报酬与作品后期的市场价值之间相差悬殊,进而导致我国著作权合同领域的利益失衡问题日益凸显。针对此等现象,若不能及时找到切实可行的出路,那么将不利于原创作品的产生,更有违著作权法的本旨。为了应对著作权领域的交易不公平问题,很多国家的著作权法都不同程度地采用了归复权制度,即在满足特定要件时允许创作者收回被转让或许可的著作权。正确认识归复权制度的成因、理念及具体规则,结合本土制度框架及产业运作模式进行选择与优化,最终落脚于该制度在我国的具体构建及实际应用,可为著作权法的修订及配套法律文件的制定与修改提供重要的现实建议。
Abstract: In the copyright trading market, the crea-tors usually arrange the commercial utilization of the works by the copyright contract to the other side, so as to obtain economic benefits. However, due to the differences in economic status and transaction experience between creators and communicators, combined with the inherent ad-vantages of the communicators in controlling communication channels and technologies, the con-tract remuneration of some creators and the market value of the late works are greatly different from each other, which leads to the increasingly prominent imbalance of interest in the field of cop-yright contract in our country. In view of such phenomenon, if we cannot find a practical way out in time, it will not be conducive to the production of original works, but also violate the essence of copyright law. In order to deal with the unfair trade in the field of copyright, copyright laws of many countries have adopted the right of reversion system to varying degrees, that is, to allow the creator to recover the transferred or licensed copyright when certain requirements are met. Correctly un-derstanding the origin, concept and concrete rules of the system of the right of reversion, combining with the local institutional framework and industrial operation mode for selection and optimization, finally footing in the concrete construction and practical application of the system in our country, can provide important practical suggestions for the revision of the copyright law and the formula-tion and modification of supporting legal documents.
文章引用:范楚仪. 论著作权法中的归复权制度[J]. 争议解决, 2023, 9(2): 440-450. https://doi.org/10.12677/DS.2023.92059

参考文献

[1] Zimmerman, D.L. (2003) Authorship without Ownership: Reconsidering Incentives in a Digital Age. 52 DePaul L. Rev., p. 1121, 1145.
[2] 崔立红. 作者、表演者公平报酬权比较研究[J]. 山东社会科学, 2019, 289(9): 171-176.
[3] 李雨峰. 论追续权制度在我国的构建——以《著作权法》第三次修改为中心[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2014, 32(1): 126-136.
[4] Bently, L. and Ginsburg, J.C. (2010) The Sole Right Shall Return to the Authors: Anglo-American Authors Reversion Rights from the Statute of Ann to Contemporary US. Copyright, 25 Berkeley Tech. L. J.1475, p. 1493.
[5] 冯晓青. 著作权法之激励理论研究——以经济学、社会福利理论与后现代主义为视角[J]. 法律科学(西北政法学院学报), 2006, 24(6): 41-49.
[6] 王迁. 知识产权法教程[M]. 第七版. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2020: 147-148.
[7] Netanel, N. (1993) Copyright Alienability Restrictions and the Enhancement of Author Autonomy: A Normative Evaluation, 24 Rutgers L. J. 347, 389.
[8] 范长军. 德国著作权法[M]. 北京: 知识产权出版社, 2013: 30-31.
[9] 阮开欣. 欧盟版权法下公平报酬制度探析[J]. 中国出版, 2021, 505(8): 67-70.
[10] 周恒. 著作权许可合同中利益失衡问题的治理——以《欧盟数字化单一市场版权指令》为镜鉴[J]. 知识产权, 2021, 243(5): 41-55.
[11] 崔建远. 合同法总论[M]. 第二版. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2016: 93-95.
[12] 熊琦. 著作权合同实质公平规则形塑[J]. 法学, 2020, 463(6): 47-62.