催收非法债务罪的立法定位原理
The Legislative Orientation Principle of Collecting Illegal Debts in Criminal Law
摘要: 以极端手段索取债务向来是为制定法所厌恶的,在过去以极端方法催收债务有可能被处以敲诈勒索罪、非法拘禁罪等罪名,然而上述个罪的入罪门槛都相对较高,经过司法实践校验不足以达到保护债务人的目的。刑法修正案(十一)规定的催收非法债务罪是在已有罪名的基础上,升格债务性质门槛而降低催收行为暴力性质门槛的一项罪名。换言之,在刑法的视野中,催收法所不予保护的债务,将不再被予以往的容忍度。结合催收非法债务罪的条文定位和法定刑,可以认为该罪是积极刑法观影响下刑法对于可能受非法债务迫害的“债务人”以更高规格的手段予以保护的产物。
Abstract: Before the crime of collecting illegal debts appeared, the criminal law could not protect the debtors in the illegal debts from every single case. At present, collecting the debts which are not protected by the collection law will no longer be tolerated by the criminal law. The crime of collecting illegal debts is the product of a positive criminal law view, which will give people persecuted by illegal debts a higher standard of protection in the future.
文章引用:黄倬一. 催收非法债务罪的立法定位原理[J]. 争议解决, 2023, 9(2): 469-475. https://doi.org/10.12677/DS.2023.92063

参考文献

[1] 边沁, 著. 道德与立法原理导论[M]. 时殷弘, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2003: 58-61.
[2] 张明楷. 催收非法债务罪的另类解释[J]. 政法论坛, 2022(2): 2-6, 2-9.
[3] 赵天琦. 论催收非法债务罪的保护法益与理解适用[J]. 西南政法大学学报, 2022(4): 18-21.
[4] 赖旱兴, 王家伦. 论催收非法债务罪的罪数问题[J]. 中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版), 2022(3): 61-62.
[5] H.L.A哈特, 著. 法律的概念[M]. 许家馨, 李冠宜, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2017: 6-8, 78-85.
[6] 张明楷, 著. 刑法学(上) [M]. 第五版. 北京: 法律出版社, 2020: 21-23, 503-507.
[7] 黑格尔, 著. 法哲学原理[M]. 范阳, 张企泰, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2019: 115, 50-52.