胃癌淋巴结转移对不同T分期特异性生存率影响的临床分析
Clinical Analysis of the Effect of Gastric Cancer Lymph Node Metastasis on the Specific Survival Rate of Different T Stages
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2023.133472, PDF,   
作者: 孙贻恭:青岛大学附属青岛市市立医院普外科,山东 青岛;毛伟征*:青岛市市立医院普外科,山东 青岛
关键词: 胃癌特异性生存期转移淋巴结SEERT分期Gastric Cancer Cancer-Specific Survival Metastasis Lymph Nodes SEER T-Stage
摘要: 目的:分析胃癌淋巴结转移对不同T分期特异性生存率的影响。方法:以美国SEER数据库为基础,筛选出2010年至2015年信息完整的1918例胃癌手术患者,分析胃癌的特异性生存率(CSS)。生存分析采用K-M法,利用单变量和多变量Cox比例风险回归评估独立预后的生存风险因素,计算并校正特异性死亡的风险比(HR)结果,95%置信区间(CI)。组间逐对比较采用Bonferroni法。结果:胃癌总体病人中,随T分期增加,CSS逐渐降低,HR逐渐升高。无淋巴结转移时,各组CSS和HR变化趋势与总体病人相同,各组病人CSS均较总体病人升高,其中T3期病人CSS上升明显,接近T2期病人。有淋巴结转移时,各组病人CSS均显著降低,T2期CSS最高,T1期和T2期病人组间HR在校正前(HR = 0.961,95% CI 0.599~1.539,P = 0.867)和校正后(HR = 0.886,95% CI 0.552~1.423,P = 0.616)差异均无统计学意义。结论:胃癌淋巴结转移对各组T分期显著降低生存率。无淋巴结转移时,T3期病人生存率升高,接近T2期病人。有淋巴结转移时,T1期生存率比T2期病人的预后更差。
Abstract: Objective: To analyze the effect of lymph node metastasis on the specific survival rate of different T stages in gastric cancer. Methods: Based on the American SEER database, 1918 patients with gastric cancer with complete information from 2010 to 2015 were selected, and the specific survival rate (CSS) of gastric cancer was analyzed. Survival analysis was conducted using K-M method, univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression were used to evaluate the survival risk factors of independent prognosis, and the risk ratio of specific death (HR) was calculated and corrected 95% confidence interval (CI). The Bonferroni method was used to compare the groups one by one. Result: In total patients with gastric cancer, CSS decreased and HR increased with the increase of T stage. When there was no lymph node metastasis, the change trend of CSS and HR in each group was same as that in total patients, and the CSS in each group was higher than that in total patients, and the CSS in patients with stage T3 was significantly higher than that in patients with stage T2. When there was lymph node metastasis, the CSS of all patients decreased significantly, and the CSS of stage T2 was the highest. There was no significant difference in HR between stage T1 and stage T2 patients before (HR = 0.961, 95% CI 0.599 - 1.539, P = 0.867) and after adjustment (HR = 0.886, 95% CI 0.552 - 1.423, P = 0.616). Conclusion: Lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer significantly re-duced the survival rate of each T stage group. When there was no lymph node metastasis, the sur-vival rate of patients with stage T3 was higher, which was close to that of patients with stage T2. When there was lymph node metastasis, the survival rate of stage T1 was worse than that of stage T2.
文章引用:孙贻恭, 毛伟征. 胃癌淋巴结转移对不同T分期特异性生存率影响的临床分析[J]. 临床医学进展, 2023, 13(3): 3317-3327. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2023.133472

参考文献

[1] Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R.L., et al. (2021) Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71, 209-249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Pourmousavi, M.K., Wang, R., Kerdsirichairat, T., et al. (2020) Compara-ble Cancer-Specific Mortality of Patients with Early Gastric Cancer Treated with Endoscopic Therapy vs Surgical Resec-tion. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 18, 2824-2832.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Muralidhar, V., Mahal, B.A., Nezolosky, M.D., et al. (2016) Asso-ciation between Very Small Tumour Size and Increased Cancer-Specific Mortality after Radical Prostatectomy in Lymph Node-Positive Prostate Cancer. BJU International, 118, 279-285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Deng, J., Yamashita, H., Seto, Y., et al. (2017) Increasing the Number of Examined Lymph Nodes Is a Prerequisite for Improve-ment in the Accurate Evaluation of Overall Survival of Node-Negative Gastric Cancer Patients. Annals of Surgical On-cology, 24, 745-753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Khalaf, N., El-Serag, H.B., Abrams, H.R., et al. (2021) Burden of Pancreatic Cancer: From Epidemiology to Practice. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 19, 876-884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Tai, Q., Xue, W., Li, M., et al. (2022) Survival Nomo-gram for Metastasis Colon Cancer Patients Based on SEER Database. Frontiers in Genetics, 13, Article ID: 832060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Wu, W.T., Li, Y.J., Feng, A.Z., et al. (2021) Data Mining in Clin-ical Big Data: The Frequently Used Databases, Steps, and Methodological Models. Military Medical Research, 8, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Liu, Y., Cui, H., Xu, X., et al. (2022) Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Density on Cancer Staging System for Gastric Cancer without Distal Metastasis: A Population-Based Analysis of SEER Database. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 20, 325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Hanada, Y., Choi, A.Y., Hwang, J.H., et al. (2019) Low Fre-quency of Lymph Node Metastases in Patients in the United States with Early-Stage Gastric Cancers That Fulfill Japa-nese Endoscopic Resection Criteria. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 17, 1763-1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Zwager, L.W., Bastiaansen, B.A.J., Montazeri, N.S.M., et al. (2022) Deep Submucosal Invasion Is Not an Independent Risk Factor for Lymph Node Metastasis in T1 Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Gastroenterology, 163, 174-189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Zhang, N., Bai, H., Deng, J., et al. (2020) Impact of Examined Lymph Node Count on Staging and Long-Term Survival of Patients with Node-Negative Stage III Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Study Using a Chinese Multi-Institutional Registry with Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Data Validation. Annals of Translational Medicine, 8, 1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Oh, S.Y., Lee, J.H., Lee, H.J., et al. (2019) Natural History of Gastric Cancer: Observational Study of Gastric Cancer Patients Not Treated during Follow-Up. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 26, 2905-2911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Everett, S.M. and Axon, A.T. (1998) Early Gastric Cancer: Dis-ease or Pseudo-Disease? The Lancet, 351, 1350-1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Zhu, M.H., et al. (2021) Impact of Lymph Nodes Examined on Survival in ypN0 Gastric Cancer Patients: A Population-Based Study. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 25, 919-925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Zheng, X., Guo, K., Wasan, H.S., et al. (2021) A Pop-ulation-Based Study: How to Identify High-Risk T1 Gastric Cancer Patients? American Journal of Cancer Research, 11, 1463-1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Lee, J.H., Kedia, P., Stavropoulos, S.N., et al. (2021) AGA Clinical Practice Update on Endoscopic Management of Perforations in Gastrointestinal Tract: Expert Review. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 19, 2252-2261.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2021) Japanese Gastric Can-cer Treatment Guidelines 2018 (5th Edition). Gastric Cancer, 24, 1-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Ito, Y., Miyashiro, I., Ishikawa, T., et al. (2021) Determinant Factors on Differences in Survival for Gastric Cancer Between the United States and Japan Using Nationwide Databases. Journal of Epidemiology, 31, 241-248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Chen, Y., Sun, R. and Liu, W. (2022) Impact of a Previous Cancer History on the Overall Survival of Patients with Primary Gastric Cancer: A SEER Population-Based Study. European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 48, 2159-2165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Guo, S., Shang, M., Dong, Z., et al. (2021) The Assessment of the Optimal Number of Examined Lymph Nodes and Prognostic Models Based on Lymph Nodes for Predicting Survival Outcome in Patients with Stage N3b Gastric Cancer. Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology, 17, e117-e124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]