君子人格塑造积极人生：探讨君子人格与主观幸福感的关系及时间观的作用
Junzi Personality Builds a Positive Life: To Explore the Relationship between Junzi Personality and Subjective Well-Being and the Effect of Time Perspective
摘要: 中华民族伟大复兴需要中国传统文化重建人们的内心力量。本研究从传统文化心理学与积极心理学整合对比研究的视角，探讨君子人格与主观幸福感的关系及其内在机制。结果表明：1) 君子人格正向显著预测主观幸福感和生活满意度；2)“诚”在君子人格与主观幸福感及君子人格与生活满意度关系间均起部分中介作用，君子人格能通过增强个体“诚”，进而增强其生活满意度与主观幸福感；3) 君子人格影响生活满意度时，未来时间观、积极的过去时间观、享乐的现在时间观的调节作用显著，另外积极过去时间观能增强“诚”的中介效应，而享乐的现在时间观减弱“诚”的中介效应；4) 君子人格影响主观幸福感指数时，时间观调节作用不显著，真实性的中介作用也不受时间观的调节作用，但是发现君子人格经过宿命的现在时间观和真实性的链式中介作用正向预测主观幸福感。
Abstract: A great revitalization of the Chinese nation needs Chinese traditional culture to rebuild people’s inner strength. From the perspective of integrating and contrasting traditional culture psychology and positive psychology, this study explores the relationship between Junzi personality and subjective well-being and its internal mechanism. The results showed that: 1) Junzi personality significantly and positively predicted subjective well-being and life satisfaction. 2) “Authenticity” partially mediates the relationship between Junzi personality and subjective well-being, and between Junzi personality and life satisfaction. Junzi personality can enhance individual’s life satisfaction and subjective well-being by enhancing their “Authenticity”. 3) As Junzi personality affects life satisfaction, these effects were significantly moderated by Future TP and Past Positive TP and Present Hedonistic TP. In addition, the Past Positive TP can enhance the mediating effect of Authenticity, while the Present Hedonistic TP can weaken the mediating effect of Authenticity. 4) As Junzi affects subjective well-being index, the moderating effect of Time Perspective is not significant, and the mediating effect of authenticity is not moderated by any Time Perspective. However, it found that Junzi personality positively predicts happiness through the chain mediating effects of Present Fatalistic TP and Authenticity.
文章引用：李红, 蒋多, 张玮 (2023). 君子人格塑造积极人生：探讨君子人格与主观幸福感的关系及时间观的作用. 心理学进展, 13(3), 684-696. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2023.133084

参考文献

[1] 陈光磊(2005). 论中国文化中的心理健康标准. 青海社会科学, (1), 69-73.
[2] 陈士奇(2013). 社会赞许性反应的本土研究. 教育心理, (22), 202+209.
[3] 葛枭语, 侯玉波(2019). 君子型人格的结构与测量. 见 第二十二届全国心理学学术会议摘要集(pp. 1168-1169). 中国心理学会.
[4] 葛枭语, 侯玉波(2021a). 君子不忧不惧: 君子人格与心理健康——自我控制与真实性的链式中介. 心理学报, 53(4), 374-386.
[5] 葛枭语, 侯玉波(2021b). 君子之乐: 君子人格与主观幸福感——敬畏的中介作用. 见 第二十三届全国心理学学术会议摘要集(上) (pp. 758-759). 中国心理学会.
[6] 葛枭语, 李小明, 侯玉波(2021). 孔子思想中的君子人格: 心理学测量的探索. 心理学报, 53(12), 1321-1334.
[7] 何贵兵, 张玮, 成龙(2010). 中国文化价值观和未来时间取向对幸福感的影响. 应用心理学, 16(3), 250-256.
[8] 洪修平, 孙亦平(2018). 君子、理想人格及儒道君子文化的相异互补. 哲学研究, (4), 54-61.
[9] 景怀斌(2007). 儒家的人格结构及心理学扩展. 现代哲学, (5), 48-56.
[10] 李建伟, 李飞, 胡凌燕(2009). 中国大学生理想中的“君子”人格结构探研——基于4982名大学生的调查研究. 通化师范学院学报, 30(3), 81-83.
[11] 李小保, 杜刚, 吕厚超, 罗书晗(2020). 现在宿命和主观幸福感的关系: 时间焦虑和时间顺从的中介作用. 心理研究, 13(1), 25-31.
[12] 李小保, 吕厚超(2021). 社区居民疫情风险感知、感知压力与心理健康的关系: 未来时间洞察力和社会信心的作用. 见 第二十三届全国心理学学术会议摘要集(p. 179). 中国心理学会.
[13] 梁漱溟(2008). 梁漱溟先生讲孔孟(李渊庭, 阎秉华, 整理, pp. 15-17). 上海三联书店.
[14] 梁燕芳, 谢天(2021). 东西方文化下的真实自我研究: 一种关系的视角. 心理科学进展, 29(5), 894-905.
[15] 鲁石, 杨磊(2013). 当代大学生的君子观调查及其教育启示. 苏州教育学院学报, 30(2), 82-84.
[16] 吕厚超, 黄希庭(2005). 时间洞察力的概念及研究方法. 心理科学, 28(1), 166-169.
[17] 马晨雪(2013). 浅析孔子的天命观. 文教资料, (16), 82-83.
[18] 宋莉莉, 王詠, 赵昱鲲(2020). 真实性量表在我国青少年中的信效度检验. 中国临床心理学杂志, 28(2), 345-347.
[19] 汪向东, 王希林, 马弘(1999). 心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版). 中国心理卫生杂志社.
[20] 王晨(2016). 时间洞察力: 问卷修订及对风险驾驶行为的影响. 硕士学位论文, 重庆: 西南大学.
[21] 温忠麟, 叶宝娟(2014a). 中介效应分析: 方法和模型发展. 心理学报, 22(5), 731-745.
[22] 温忠麟, 叶宝娟(2014b). 有调节的中介模型检验方法: 竞争还是替补? 心理学报, 46(5), 714-726.
[23] 杨钢, 李小平(2020). 基于津巴多时间洞察力的时间观疗法研究进展. 广东职业技术教育与研究, (4), 193-195.
[24] 杨秀君, 孔克勤(2003). 主观幸福感与人格关系的研究. 心理科学, 26(1), 121-123.
[25] 张亚宁(2009). 《中庸》“诚”的思想. 孔子研究, 39(3), 80-83.
[26] 周浩, 龙立荣(2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.
[27] 朱呈呈, 王晶, 侯玉波(2019). 儒家式君子型人格对员工创造力表现影响研究. 见 第二十二届全国心理学学术会议摘要集(pp. 1166-1167). 中国心理学会.
[28] Diener, E. (2012). New Findings and Future Directions for Subjective Well-Being Research. American Psychologist, 67, 590-597.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Personality and Subjective Well-Being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (pp. 213-229). Russell Sage Foundation.
[30] Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment,49, 71-75.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Ge, X. Y. (2020). Oriental Wisdom for Interpersonal Life: Confucian Ideal Personality Traits (Junzi Personality) Predict Positive Interpersonal Relationships. Journal of Research in Personality, 89, Article ID: 104034.[CrossRef] 
[32] Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford Press.
[33] Kokkoris, M. D., Hoelzl, E., & Alós-Ferrer, C. (2019). True to Which Self? Lay Rationalism and Decision Satisfaction in Self-Control Conflicts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117, 417-447.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Schimmack, U., Radhakrishnan, P., Oishi, S., Dzokoto, V., & Ahadi, S. (2002). Culture, Personality, and Subjective Well-Being: Integrating Process Models of Life Satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 582-593.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Schlegel, R. J., Hicks, J. A., Arndt, J., & King, L. A. (2009). Thine Own Self: True Self-Concept Accessibility and Meaning in Life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 473-490. https://sci-hub.wf/10.1037/a0014060[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Sutton, A. (2020). Living the Good Life: A Meta-Analysis of Authenticity, Well-Being and Engagement. Personality and Individual Differences, 153, Article ID: 109645.[CrossRef] 
[37] Thomaes, S., Sedikides, C., Nellie, V. D. B., Hutteman, R., & Reijntjes, A. (2017). Happy to Be “Me”? Authenticity, Psychological Need Satisfaction, and Subjective Well-Being in Adolescence. Child Development, 88, 1045.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[38] Wood, A. M., Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Baliousis, M., & Joseph, S. (2008). The Authentic Personality: A Theoretical and Empirical Conceptualization and the Development of the Authenticity Scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55, 385-399.[CrossRef] 
[39] Zheng, S. F., Sun, S. S., Huang, C., & Zou, Z. M. (2020). Authenticity and Subjective Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Mindfulness. Journal of Research in Personality, 84, Article ID: 103900.[CrossRef] 
[40] Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting Time in Perspective: A Valid, Reliable Individual-Differences Metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271-1288.[CrossRef]