论理论对话及研究生理论创新——以王初明、文秋芳和周频之间的对话为例
A Thesis on Theoretical Exchanges and Theoretical Innovation for Postgraduate Students—Taking the Conversation of Wang Chuming, Wen Qiufang, and Zhou Pin as an Example
摘要: 理论对话对理论的完善与发展具有重要的意义,本文以王初明、文秋芳及周频对“写长法”的对话为基础,学习三者的批判精神,同时分析他们对话中存在的问题,提出理论对话应该采取正确的态度。从他们的理论对话中我们也发现他们多倾向于具体、应用型研究,这与中国思维传统有关。当代研究生要学习他们的理论对话和理论批判精神。而且,研究生想要进行理论创新就要提升自身研究的积极性、努力培养自己的兴趣。
Abstract: Theoretical exchanges are of great importance to the improvement of an imperfect theory. Based on the exchanges of Wang Chuming, Wen Qiufang, and Zhou Pin on the theory “The Method of Writing Long”, learning the critical spirit of them, we analyzed the problems in their exchanges and encouraged a right attitude in theoretical exchanges. We found that they tend to study concrete and practical contents in their studies, which is related to our traditional thinking. Graduate students should learn from their critical exchanges and thinking in theories. In addition, if graduate students want to make breakthrough in theories, they should improve their enthusiasm in research and strive to find what they are interested in.
文章引用:王在花. 论理论对话及研究生理论创新——以王初明、文秋芳和周频之间的对话为例[J]. 现代语言学, 2023, 11(3): 772-776. https://doi.org/10.12677/ML.2023.113109

参考文献

[1] 余斌. 论批判[J]. 中国井冈山干部学院学报, 2021, 14(5): 31-37.
[2] 文秋芳. 评析外语写长法[J]. 现代外语, 2005, 28(3): 308-311+330.
[3] 周频. 论理论的“内部批判”与“外部批判”——以王初明与文秋芳关于“写长法”之争为例[J]. 中国外语, 2008, 5(1): 52-56.
[4] 王初明. 外语教学应以学生为本——答文秋芳[J]. 现代外语, 2005, 28(3): 312-315.
[5] 文秋芳. 对周频《论理论的“内部批判”与“外部批判”》的回应[J]. 中国外语, 2008, 5(1): 57-58.
[6] 刘志青. 创新需要学术争鸣[J]. 军事历史, 2003(5): 67-70.
[7] 王初明. 争鸣一定要采用内部批判方式吗? [J]. 中国外语, 2008(1): 59+63.
[8] 涂冰燕. 中西方思维方式差异研究[J]. 河南机电高等专科学校学报, 2015, 23(2): 67-70.