具体打击错误的处断原则分析

Analysis of the Principles of Adjudication of Specific Striking Errors

摘要: 打击错误是事实错误的重要组成部分，在处理原则上，学界和司法实践中一直存在具体符合说和法定符合说的争论。两种学说本质上的不同，皆是由对故意理论认识的差异导致的。而具体符合说在处理打击错误的案件中，相较于法定符合说，更加符合责任主义，也更加注重对法益主体的区分，有利于平等的保护各法益主体。

Abstract: The debate between the doctrine of specific conformity and the doctrine of statutory conformity has always existed in academic circles and judicial practice in dealing with the factual error as an important part of the error of fact. The difference in the nature of the two doctrines is due to the difference in the understanding of the doctrine of intentionality. The specific conformity theory is more in line with the liability doctrine than the statutory conform-ity theory in dealing with cases of striking errors, and also pays more attention to the distinction between the subjects of legal interests, which is conducive to the equal protection of the subjects of legal interests.