家校社协同育人实施途径新探索——基于《教育人类学》空间观的教育意蕴
New Explorations on the Implementation of Collaborative Education among Home, School and Community—Based on the Educational Implication of Spatial Perspective of “Educational Anthropology”
摘要: 在《教育人类学》一书中,博尔诺夫阐述了教育人类学意义上的空间观。这种空间观主要包括:内部、外部以及自由空间。内部空间为安全舒适的私人区域,外部空间为共同行动的公共空间,自由空间指令人心驰神往的广阔世界。三种空间可与三种不同形态的教育空间一一对应,内部空间可隐喻为家庭空间,外部空间可隐喻为学校空间,自由空间可隐喻为社会空间。其空间观至少对探索家校社协同育人至少有着如下启示:其一,对家庭教育而言,需要保护氛围,维护教育的稳定性;其二,学校教育需要应对风险,把握教育的非连续性;其三,社会教育需要进行激励,关注教育的未来性;其四,就三位一体而言需要连接不同空间,保持教育的平衡性。
Abstract:
Otto Friedrich Bollnow elaborates on the spatial concept of educational anthropology in his book “Anthropology of Education”. This spatial concept mainly includes: internal, external, and free space. The internal space is a safe and comfortable private area, the external space is a public space for collective action, and the free space refers to a vast world that inspires the human mind. These three types of spaces can correspond to three different forms of educational spaces, where the in-ternal space can be metaphorically represented as the home space, the external space can be met-aphorically represented as the school space, and the free space can be metaphorically represented as the social space. This spatial concept provides at least the following insights for exploring the collaborative education among families, schools, and society: First, for family education, it is necessary to protect the atmosphere and maintain the stability of education. Second, school education needs to respond to risks and grasp the non-continuity of education. Third, social education needs to provide motivation and focus on the future of education. Fourth, in terms of the tripartite relationship, it is necessary to connect different spaces and maintain the balance of education.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
O.F.博尔诺夫. 教育人类学[M]. 李其龙, 译. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 1999.
|
|
[2]
|
杨梅, 郑枫. 家校合作中教师的作用探讨[J]. 遵义师范学院学报, 2020, 22(3): 97-99.
|
|
[3]
|
刘铁芳. 安全感的教育意蕴及其实现[J]. 教育研究, 2016, 37(2): 50-56+77.
|
|
[4]
|
陈小萍, 安龙. 父亲协同教养对儿童亲社会行为的影响: 安全感和人际信任的链式中介作用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2019, 27(4): 803-807.
|
|
[5]
|
易晓明, 朱小蔓. 初论秩序感的教育价值及其教育建构[J]. 教育研究, 1998(7): 10-14.
|
|
[6]
|
冯跃, 刘谦. 非连续性教育的人类学评析[J]. 教育研究, 2014, 35(1): 35-40.
|
|
[7]
|
姜晓, 胥兴春. 非连续性教育思想视域下幼儿园挫折教育策略研究[J]. 江苏第二师范学院学报, 2020, 36(2): 45-48.
|
|
[8]
|
廖敏. 非连续性教育对学生困境教育的启示[J]. 法制与社会, 2019(13): 201-202.
|
|
[9]
|
潘永兴, 柳海民. 激励教育的理论注释[J]. 东北师大学报: 哲学社会科学版, 2011(3): 182-183.
|