单纯呈现效应的理论综述
A Review of the Theory of Mere Exposure Effect
DOI: 10.12677/ASS.2023.123183, PDF,   
作者: 刘 洋：西南大学心理学部，重庆
关键词: 单纯呈现；流畅性；熟悉；偏好；Mere Exposure； Fluency； Familiarity； Preference
摘要: 偏好的产生对于日常生活的选择和决策行为尤为重要，对事物的偏好影响着个体的生存和发展。本文总结了单纯呈现效应的主要理论解释，并对各个理论在解释单纯呈现效应的全面性上做了比较。通过对以往研究的梳理，总结调节单纯呈现效应大小和模式的因素，包括刺激类型、呈现类型、延迟等。本文重点阐述了加工流畅性和熟悉度对偏好的影响，区分各个理论之间关注点的差异。今后研究需侧重探究偏好产生的机制，揭示单纯呈现效应的生理及神经活动性质。
Abstract: The generation of preference is particularly important for the choice and decision-making beha-vior of daily life, and the preference for things affects the survival and development of individuals. This paper summarizes the main theoretical explanations of mere exposure effect, and compares the comprehensiveness of each theory in explaining mere exposure effect. Through sorting out previous studies, summarize the factors that regulate the size and mode of mere exposure effect, including stimulus type, presentation type, delay, etc. This paper focuses on the influence of processing fluency and familiarity on preferences, and distinguishes the differences of concerns between different theories. Future research needs to focus on exploring the mechanism of preference generation, and reveal the physiological and neural activity properties of mere exposure effect.
文章引用：刘洋. 单纯呈现效应的理论综述[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2023, 12(3): 1323-1328. https://doi.org/10.12677/ASS.2023.123183

参考文献

[1] Zajonc, R.B. (1968) Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1-27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[2] Fang, X., Singh, S. and Ahluwalia, R. (2007) An Examination of Different Explanations for the Mere Exposure Effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 97-103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[3] Moreland, R.L. and Zajonc, R.B. (1982) Exposure Effects in Person Perception: Familiarity, Similarity, and Attraction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 395-415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[4] Saguy, T. and Halperin, E. (2014) Exposure to Outgroup Members Criticizing Their Own Group Facilitates Intergroup Openness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 791-802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Berlyne, D.E. (1970) Novelty, Complexity, and Hedonic Value. Perception and Psychophysics, 8, 279-286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] Harrison, A.A. and Crandall, R. (1972) Heterogeneity-Homogeneity of Exposure Sequence and the Attitudinal Effect of Exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 234-238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Alter, A.L. and Oppenheimer, D.M. (2009) Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 219-235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Claypool, H.M., Hall, C.E., Mackie, D.M. and Garcia-Marques, T. (2008) Positive Mood, Attribution, and the Illusion of Familiarity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 721-728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] Reber, R. and Schwarz, N. (1999) Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Judgments of Truth. Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal, 8, 338-342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Reber, R., Winkielman, P. and Schwarz, N. (2016) Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Affective Judgments. Psychological Science, 9, 45-48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] Whittlesea, B.W., Jacoby, L.L. and Girard, K. (1990) Illusions of Immediate Memory: Evidence of an Attributional Basis for Feelings of Familiarity and Perceptual Quality. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 716-732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[12] Bornstein, R.F. and D’Agostino, P.R. (1994) The Attribution and Discounting of Perceptual Fluency: Preliminary Tests of a Perceptual Fluency/Attributional Model of the Mere Exposure Effect. Social Cognition, 12, 103-128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[13] de Zilva, D., Vu, L., Newell, B.R. and Pearson, J. (2013) Exposure Is Not Enough: Suppressing Stimuli from Awareness Can Abolish the Mere Exposure Effect. PLOS ONE, 8, e77726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Newell, B.R. and Shanks, D.R. (2007) Recognising What You Like: Examining the Relation between the Mere-Ex- posure Effect and Recognition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 103-118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[15] Stafford, T. and Grimes, A. (2012) Memory Enhances the Mere Exposure Effect. Psychology and Marketing, 29, 995-1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] Mrkva, K. and Van Boven, L. (2020) Salience Theory of Mere Exposure: Relative Exposure Increases Liking, Extremity, and Emotional Intensity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: Attitudes and Social Cognition, 118, 1118-1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Borji, A., Sihite, D.N. and Itti, L. (2013) What Stands out in a Scene? A Study of Human Explicit Saliency Judgment. Vision Research, 91, 62-77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Parkhurst, D., Law, K. and Niebur, E. (2002) Modeling the Role of Salience in the Allocation of Overt Visual Attention. Vision Research, 42, 107-123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[19] Uddin, L.Q. (2015) Salience Processing and Insular Cortical Function and Dysfunction. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16, 55-61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Bacon, W.F. and Egeth, H.E. (1994) Overriding Stimulus-Driven Attentional Capture. Perception and Psychophysics, 55, 485-496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[21] Fecteau, J.H. and Munoz, D.P. (2006) Salience, Relevance, and Firing: A Priority Map for Target Selection. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 382-390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Peters, R.J., Iyer, A., Itti, L. and Koch, C. (2005) Components of Bottom-Up Gaze Allocation in Natural Images. Vision Research, 45, 2397-2416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Brascamp, J.W., Knapen, T.H., Kanai, R., Noest, A.J., van Ee, R. and van den Berg, A.V. (2008) Multi-Timescale Perceptual History Resolves Visual Ambiguity. PLOS ONE, 3, e1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Kristjansson, A. and Campana, G. (2010) Where Perception Meets Memory: A Review of Repetition Priming in Visual Search Tasks. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 72, 5-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[25] Bornstein, R.F. (1989) Exposure and Affect: Overview and Meta-Analysis of Research, 1968-1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265-289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[26] Morvinski, C. and Amir, O. (2018) Liking Goes with Liking: An Intuitive Congruence between Preference and Prominence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44, 944-961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Winkielman, P., Halberstadt, J., Fazendeiro, T. and Catty, S. (2006) Prototypes Are Attractive Because They Are Easy on the Mind. Psychological Science, 17, 799-806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Reber, R., Schwarz, N. and Winkielman, P. (2004) Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver’s Processing Experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 364-382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Stang, D.J. (1974) Methodological Factors in Mere Exposure Research. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 1014-1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[30] Montoya, R.M., Horton, R.S., Vevea, J.L., Citkowicz, M. and Lauber, E.A. (2017) A Re-Examination of the Mere Exposure Effect: The Influence of Repeated Exposure on Recognition, Familiarity, and Liking. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 459-498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Meskin, A., Phelan, M., Moore, M. and Kieran, M. (2013) Mere Exposure to Bad Art. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 53, 139-164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[32] Siegel, P. and Weinberger, J. (2012) Less Is More: The Effects of Very Brief versus Clearly Visible Exposure. Emotion, 12, 394-402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

为你推荐