孕早期母体上腹部脂肪厚度预测妊娠期糖尿病的价值
The Value of Maternal Upper Abdominal Ad-ipose Thickness in Predicting GDM in Early Pregnancy
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2023.133674, PDF,   
作者: 郭娜娜:青岛大学附属威海市立二院超声科,山东 威海;杨宗利*:青岛大学附属医院腹部超声科,山东 青岛
关键词: 妊娠期糖尿病上腹部脂肪厚度超声Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Upper Abdomen Adipose Thickness Ultrasonography
摘要: 目的:研究孕早期母体上腹部脂肪厚度预测妊娠期糖尿病(gestational diabetes mellitus, GDM)的价值。方法:选取2021年7月至2022年7月在青岛大学附属威海市立二院建档产检的11~13 W+6的单胎孕妇,无1型、2型糖尿病及其它并发症。于孕妇上腹部剑突下测量上腹部脂肪厚度,包括皮下脂肪厚度(subcutaneous adipose thickness, SAT)和内脏脂肪厚度(visceral adipose thickness, VAT)。所有孕妇均填写调查问卷,记录孕妇的年龄,身高,体重,孕前体重,孕早期增长体重,有无糖尿病家族史等基本信息。根据75 g口服葡萄糖耐量(oral glucose tolerance test, OGTT)结果将所有孕妇分为GDM组和对照组。对两组孕妇的基本信息及脂肪厚度进行比较。利用单因素及多因素逻辑回归方法分析孕早期母体的SAT及VAT与GDM的关系,计算各影响因素的比值比(odds ratio, OR)及95%置信区间(confidence interval, CI)。利用受试者工作特征曲线(receiver operating characteristic, ROC)计算灵敏度、特异度、曲线下面积(area under curve, AUC)及最佳截断值,评价其预测GDM的价值。结果:共有572例孕妇纳入研究,其中对照组499例,GDM组73例。单因素逻辑回归分析显示,SAT及VAT均是GDM的危险因素。OR值及95% CI分别为5.887 (95% CI 3.636~9.531)、4.044 (95% CI 2.4~6.815)。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,SAT及VAT依然是GDM的危险因素。OR值及95% CI分别为8.688 (95% CI 4.555~16.57)、4.255 (95% CI 2.060~8.787)。ROC曲线分析显示SAT及VAT预测GDM的曲线下面积分别为0.746、0.678,两者联合预测GDM的曲线下面积为0.762,SAT及VAT预测GDM的最佳截断值为2.18 cm、1.80 cm。结论:1) 孕早期母体上腹部SAT及VAT与孕中期GDM的发生具有明显的正相关性,是孕中期GDM发生的独立危险因素。2) 增高的SAT及VAT对预测GDM的诊断具有一定的临床意义。
Abstract: Objective: To study the value of maternal upper abdominal adipose thickness in predicting GDM in early pregnancy. Methods: From July 2021 to July 2022, the pregnant women at 11~13 W+6 who were registered in Weihai Municipal Second Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University were selected, without type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes and other complications. We measured the adipose thick-ness in the upper abdomen of pregnant women, including subcutaneous adipose thickness (SAT) and visceral adipose thickness (VAT). All pregnant women filled in the questionnaires, which rec-orded the age, height, weight, weight before pregnancy, weight gained, family history of diabetes and so on. According to the OGTT results, all the pregnant women were divided into two groups, the GDM group and the control group. To compare and analyze the basic information and adipose thickness of the two groups. Single factor regression analysis and multivariate regression analysis was used to analysis the relation between SAT, VAT and GDM. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confi-dence interval (CI) of each factor were calculated. The ROC curve was used to calculate sensitivity, specificity, area under curve (AUC) and optimal cut-off value, to evaluate the value of SAT and VAT in predicting GDM. Results: A total of 572 pregnant women were included in the study, including 499 in the control group and 73 in the GDM group. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that SAT and VAT were risk factors for GDM. OR values and 95% CI were 5.887 (95% CI 3.636~9.531) and 4.044 (95% CI 2.4~6.815), respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that SAT and VAT were still risk factors for GDM. OR values and 95% CI were 8.688 (95% CI 4.555~16.57) and 4.255 (95% CI 2.060~8.787), respectively. The ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve for predicting GDM by SAT and VAT were 0.746 and 0.678, respectively. The area under the curve for jointly predicting GDM by SAT and VAT was 0.762, and the optimal cutoff values for predicting GDM by SAT and VAT were 2.18 cm and 1.80 cm. Conclusions: 1) The adipose thickness of upper abdomen in early pregnancy has a significant positive correlation with the occurrence of GDM, which was independent risk factor of GDM. 2) Increased SAT and VAT have certain clinical significance in predicting the diagnosis of GDM.
文章引用:郭娜娜, 杨宗利. 孕早期母体上腹部脂肪厚度预测妊娠期糖尿病的价值[J]. 临床医学进展, 2023, 13(3): 4702-4710. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2023.133674

参考文献

[1] Mirghani, D.A. and Doupis, J. (2017) Gestational Diabetes from A to Z. World Journal of Diabetes, 8, 489-511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] 关怀, 尚丽新. 妊娠期糖尿病流行现状[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2015, 31(1): 91-94.
[3] 娜仁其木格, 李冬梅, 米林香, 等. 中国妊娠期糖尿病患病率的Meta分析[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2018, 18(3): 280-285.
[4] O’Sullivan, J. (2011) The Boston Gestational Diabetes Studies: Review and Perspectives. In: Sutherland, H.W., et al., Eds., Carbohydrate Metabolism in Pregnancy and the Newborn IV, Springer, Berlin, 287-294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Boney, C. (2005) Metabolic Syndrome in Childhood: Associ-ation with Birth Weight, Maternal Obesity, and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Pediatrics, 115, e290-e296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] 张一涵, 朱艳, 刘春艳. 妊娠早期维生素D与妊娠期糖尿病的相关性及预测价值[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2021, 36(20): 4675-4678.
[7] 刘德泉, 郭丹, 尹虹. 孕早期生化及超声指标预测妊娠期糖尿病的研究进展[J]. 医学影像学杂志, 2020, 30(9): 1729-1733.
[8] De Souza, L.R., Berger, H. and Retnakaran, R. (2016) First-Trimester Maternal Abdominal Adiposity Predicts Dysglycemia and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Mid-Pregnancy. Diabetes Care, 39, 61-64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Mann, J. and Savage, D. (2019) What Lipodystrophies Teach Us about the Metabolic Syndrome. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 129, 4009-4021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 曹荟哲. 游离脂肪酸致胰岛素抵抗的机制研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 兰州: 兰州理工大学, 2017.
[11] 王冉, 李晓南. 人类脂肪组织部位差异性与代谢综合征[J]. 生理学报, 2017, 29(3): 357-365.
[12] Vague, J. (1956) The Degree of Masculine Differentiation of Obesity: A Factor Determining Predisposition to Diabetes, Atherosclerosis, Gout, and Uric Acid Calculous Disease. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 4, 20-34.
[13] Kansu-Celik, H., Karakaya, B. and Tasci, Y. (2018) Relationship Maternal Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue Thickness and Development of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Interventional Medicine and Applied Science, 10, 13-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Armellini, F., Zamboni, M., Rigo, L., et al. (1990) The Contribution of Sonography to the Measurement of Intra-Abdominal Fat. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, 18, 563-567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Borkan, G., Gerzof, S. and Robbins, A. (1982) Assessment of Ab-dominal Fat Content by Computed Tomography. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 36, 172-177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] 张振红. 孕早期内脏脂肪厚度对妊娠期糖尿病发病的预测价值研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 青岛: 青岛大学, 2021.
[17] Martin, A., Berger, H. and Nisenbaum, R. (2009) Abdominal Vis-ceral Adiposity in the First Trimester Predicts Glucose Intolerance in Later Pregnancy. Diabetes Care, 32, 1308-1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Thaware, P., Patterson, C. and Young, I. (2019) Clinical Utility of Ultra-sonography-Measured Visceral Adipose Tissue Depth as a Tool in Early Pregnancy Screening for Gestational Diabetes: A Proof-of-Concept Study. Diabetic Medicine, 36, 898-901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] De Souza, L.R., Berger, H., Retnakaran, R., et al. (2016) First-Trimester Maternal Abdominal Adiposity Predicts Dysglycemia and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Midpregnancy. Diabetes Care, 39, 61-64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] D’Ambrosi, F., Crovetto, F., Colosi, E., et al. (2018) Maternal Subcutane-ous and Visceral Adipose Ultrasound Thickness in Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus at 24 - 28 Weeks’ Gesta-tion. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, 43, 143-147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Gur, E., Ince, O. and Tu-ran, G. (2014) Ultrasonographic Visceral Fat Thickness in the First Trimester Can Predict Metabolic Syndrome and Ges-tational Diabetes Mellitus. Endocrine, 47, 478-484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Kennedy, N., Peek, M. and Quinton, A. (2016) Maternal Ab-dominal Subcutaneous Fat Thickness as a Predictor for Adverse Pregnancy Outcome: A Longitudinal Cohort Study. BJOG, 123, 225-232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Budak, M., Kahramanoglu, I. and Vitale, S. (2019) Maternal Ab-dominal Subcutaneous Fat Thickness as a Simple Predictor for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Journal of Perinatology, 47, 605-610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Yang, S.H., Kim, C., An, H.S., et al. (2017) Prediction of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Pregnant Korean Women Based on Abdominal Subcutaneous Fat Thickness as Meas-ured by Ultrasonography. Diabetes & Metabolism Journal, 41, 486-491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Kosus, N., Kosus, A. and Turhan, N. (2014) Relation between Abdominal Subcutaneous Fat Tissue Thickness and Inflammatory Markers during Pregnancy. Archives of Medical Sci-ence, 10, 739-745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]