儿童版积极情绪反应问卷的修订
The Revision of the Responses to Positive Affect Questionnaire for Children
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2023.133143, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 缪诗云, 张 爽, 应柳华*：浙江理工大学心理学系，浙江 杭州
关键词: 积极情绪调节；儿童；信度；效度；Positive Affect Regulation； Children； Reliability； Validity
摘要: 本研究旨在修订适合中国文化背景使用的儿童版积极情绪反应(RPA-C)问卷。具体地，以473名儿童为对象，对该问卷进行信效度进行检验。结果显示，经探索性因素分析中文版RPA-C问卷包含积极反刍和抑制两个维度，进一步的验证性因素分析表明二维的结构模型对数据的拟合较好；同时问卷也表现出了良好的效标关联效度；经项目分析该问卷具有良好的区分度；积极反刍和抑制分量表的内部一致性信度和分半信度在0.74到0.78之间，说明该问卷具有良好的信度。总体而言，中文版RPA-C具有良好的信度、效度等心理测量学指标，可以用于相关研究的施测。
Abstract: The purpose of the current study is to revise Chinese version of the Responses to Positive Affect questionnaire for children (RPA-C) in Chinese culture. A total of 473 participants were adminis-tered to complete the RPA-C. Then the psychometrics of Chinese version of the RPA-C were esti-mated. Results showed that the original two factor model with positive rumination and dampen-ing was supported using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. The two subscales showed good criterion-related validity with measures of depressive symptoms and life satisfaction. The Cronbach’s Alpha coefficients and split-half coefficients of the two subscales ranged from 0.74 to 0.78, suggesting that the scale has a good reliability. Therefore, these findings suggest that Chinese version of the RPA-C is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing children’s responses to positive affect.
文章引用：缪诗云, 张爽, 应柳华 (2023). 儿童版积极情绪反应问卷的修订. 心理学进展, 13(3), 1191-1196. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2023.133143

参考文献

[1] Bijttebier, P., Raes, F., Vasey, M. W., & Feldman, G. C. (2012). Responses to Positive Affect Predict Mood Symptoms in Children under Conditions of Stress: A Prospective Study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40, 381-389.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Bryant, F. B., &Veroff, J. (2007). Savoring: A New Model of Positive Experience. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
[3] Carl, J. R., Soskin, D. P., Kerns, C., & Barlow, D. H. (2013). Positive Emotion Regulation in Emotional Disorders: A Theoretical Review. Clinical Psychology Review, 33, 343-360.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Feldman, G. C., Joormann, J., & Johnson, S. L. (2008). Responses to Positive Affect: A Self-Report Measure of Rumination and Dampening. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32, 507-525.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Gross, J. J. (1998). The Emerging Field of Emotion Regulation: An Integrative Review. Review of General Psychology, 2, 271-299.[CrossRef] 
[6] Johnson, S. L., McKenzie, G., & McMurrich, S. (2008). Ruminative Responses to Negative and Positive Affect among Students Diagnosed with Bipolar Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32, 702-713.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Kim, B.-N., & Kwon, S.-M. (2014). Preliminary Validation of Korean-Responses to Positive Affect (K-RPA). The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 33, 243-260.[CrossRef] 
[8] Nelis, S., Luyckx, K., Feldman, G. C., Bastin, M., Raes, F., & Bijttebier, P. (2016). Assessing Response Styles to Positive Affect: One or Two Dimensions of Positive Rumination in the Responses to Positive Affect Questionnaire? Personality and Individual Differences, 89, 40-46.[CrossRef] 
[9] Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Morrow, J. (1991). A Prospective Study of Depression and Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms after a Natural Disaster: The 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 115-121.[CrossRef] 
[10] Raes, F., Daems, K., Feldman, G. C., Johson, S. L., & Van Gucht, D. (2009). A Psychometric Evaluation of the Dutch Version of the Responses to Positive Affect Questionnaire. Psychologica Belgica, 49, 293-310.[CrossRef] 
[11] Yang, H., & Guo, W. (2014). Chinese Version of the Responses to Positive Affect Questionnaire: Testing the Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity in a College Student Sample. Psychological Reports, 115, 467-484.[CrossRef]