我国删除权与欧盟被遗忘权的比较分析
A Comparative Analysis of the Right to Erasure in China and the Right to BeForgotten in the EU
摘要: 我国《个人信息保护法》第47条规定了信息主体的删除权,为个人信息处理活动的规范化提供了法律指引。删除权作为个人信息权项下的一项权利,具有人格利益的属性,删除权的适用应当符合合法、正当、必要原则。本文对我国删除权与欧盟被遗忘权进行比较分析,得出删除权和被遗忘权是两种不同的权利,被遗忘权在维护人格尊严上具有独特价值。在删除权的进一步完善过程中,可以适当引入被遗忘权,构建被遗忘权本土化的适用规则,推动个人信息的有效保护,同时促进我国互联网产业的发展。
Abstract:
Article 47 of China’s Personal Information Protection Law stipulates the right of information subjects to delete, providing legal guidance for the standardization of personal information processing activities. As a right under the right to personal information, the right to erasure has the attributes of personal interests, and the application of the right to erasure shall comply with the principles of legality, legitimacy and necessity. This paper compares and analyzes the right to erasure in China and the right to be forgotten in the EU, and concludes that the right to erasure and the right to be forgotten are two different rights, and the right to be forgotten has unique value in safeguarding human dignity. In the process of further improving the right to erasure, the right to be forgotten can be appropriately introduced, and applicable rules for the localization of the right to be forgotten can be constructed, so as to promote the effective protection of personal information and promote the development of China’s Internet industry.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
王利明. 论个人信息删除权[J]. 东方法学, 2022(1): 38-52.
|
|
[2]
|
郭春镇, 王海洋. 个人信息保护中删除权的规范构造[J]. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(10): 92-106.
|
|
[3]
|
项定宜. 个人信息处理必要性原则的规范体系研究[J]. 北方法学, 2021, 15(5): 27-37.
|
|
[4]
|
程啸. 论《个人信息保护法》中的删除权[J]. 社会科学辑刊, 2022(1): 103-113+209.
|
|
[5]
|
薛丽. GDPR生效背景下我国被遗忘权确立研究[J]. 法学论坛, 2019, 34(2): 100-109.
|
|
[6]
|
于向花. 被遗忘权研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2018.
|
|
[7]
|
王义坤, 刘金祥. 被遗忘权本土化的路径选择与规范重塑——以《个人信息保护法》第47条为中心[J]. 财经法学, 2022(3): 96-109.
|
|
[8]
|
曹新明, 宋歌. 个人信息保护视阈下删除权与被遗忘权之思辨[J]. 杭州师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 43(6): 74-81.
|