旱作区阳离子交换量土壤转换函数的研究
Study on Pedo-Transfer Functions of Cation Exchange Capacity in Dry Farming Region
DOI: 10.12677/PM.2023.133073, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 郭孝理*:煤炭科学研究总院有限公司,北京;中煤科工集团北京土地整治与生态修复科技研究院有限公司,北京;曹 梦:中国建筑一局(集团)有限公司生态园林分公司,北京
关键词: 旱作区阳离子交换量BP神经网络支持向量机多元线性回归Dry Farming Region Cation Exchange Capacity BP-Neural Network Support Vector Machines Multiple Linear Regression
摘要: 为减少大范围测定阳离子交换量(cation exchange capacity, CEC)工作量,探寻一种利用较容易测定的土壤理化性质预测CEC简单、高效的方法。本文基于旱作区152个表层0~10 cm土壤的pH、质地、有机质等数据,建立BP神经网络、支持向量机、多元线性回归3种CEC土壤转换函数,并比较分析了各方法的预测精度和敏感性。结果表明,CEC主要受有机质、黏粒的影响且呈明显的正相关关系;支持向量机预测精度最高,其决定系数(R2 = 0.58)、效率系数(E = 0.57)均高于BP神经网络和多元线性回归,均方根误差(RMSE = 5.41)均低于其他模型,多元线性回归模型预测精度最低。支持向量机方法在旱作区内能够较好地预测阳离子交换量。
Abstract: In order to reduce the workload of large-scale determination of cation exchange capacity (CEC), a simple and efficient method for predicting CEC by using easily measured soil physical and chemical properties was explored. Researcher have used different input soil properties to derive pedo-transfer functions (PTFs) to predict soil CEC. Based on the pH, texture and organic matter (OM) of 152 topsoil (0~10 cm) samples in dry farming region, the CEC soil transfer function was established by back propagation neural network (BP-NN), support vector machine (SVM) and multiple linear regression (MLR), and the prediction accuracy and sensitivity of each method were compared and analyzed. The results showed that CEC was mainly positively correlated with OM and clay. The prediction accuracy of SVM was the highest, with its decision coefficient (R2 = 0.58) and efficiency coefficient (E = 0.57) higher than BP-NN and MLR. The root mean square error of SVM (RMSE = 5.41) is lower than other models, and MLR model has the lowest prediction accuracy. SVM method can better predict cation exchange capacity in dry farming.
文章引用:郭孝理, 曹梦. 旱作区阳离子交换量土壤转换函数的研究[J]. 理论数学, 2023, 13(3): 683-693. https://doi.org/10.12677/PM.2023.133073

参考文献

[1] 孙忠祥, 李勇, 赵云泽, 等. 旱作区土壤有机碳密度空间分布特征与其驱动力分析[J]. 农业机械学报, 2019, 50(1): 255-262.
[2] Bouma, J. (1989) Using Soil Survey Data for Quantitative Land Evaluation. Advance Soil Science, 9, 177-213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Liao, K., Xu, S., Wu, J., et al. (2014) Using Support Vector Machines to Predict Cation Exchange Capacity of Different Soil Horizons in Qingdao City, China. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 177, 775-782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Ghorbani, H., Kashi, H., Hafezi, N., et al. (2015) Estimation of Soil Cation Exchange Capacity Using Multiple Regression, Artificial Neural Networks, and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System Models in Golestan Province, Iran. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 46, 763-780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Krogh, L., Breuning-Madsen, H. and Greve, M.H. (2000) Cation-Exchange Capacity Pedotransfer Functions for Danish Soils. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B-Soil & Plant Science, Section B-Plant Soil Science, 50, 1-12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Kusuma, H.S., Amenaghawon, A.N., Darmokoesoemo, H., et al. (2021) Evaluation of Extract of Ipomoea Batatas Leaves as a Green Coagulant-Flocculant for Turbid Water Treatment: Parametric Modelling and Optimization Using Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Networks. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 24, e102005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 王志强, 李航宇, 刘树阳, 等. 基于BP神经网络的咸水层CO2封存注入能力预测方法[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 53(12): 4678-4686.
[8] Wang, W., Men, C. and Lu, W. (2008) Online Prediction Model Based on Support Vector Machine. Neurocomputing, 71, 550-558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Khaledian, Y., Brevik, E.C., Pereira, P., et al. (2017) Modeling Soil Cation Exchange Capacity in Multiple Countries. Catena, 158, 194-200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Tang, L., Zeng, G., Nourbakhsh, F., et al. (2009) Artificial Neural Network Approach for Predicting Cation Exchange Capacity in Soil Based on Physico-Chemical Properties. Environmental Engineering Science, 26, 137-146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Shiri, J., Keshavarzi, A., Kisi, O., et al. (2017) Modeling Soil Cation Exchange Capacity Using Soil Parameters: Assessing The Heuristic Models. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 135, 242-251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 陈雯柏. 人工神经网络原理与实践[M]. 西安: 西安电子科技大学出版社, 2016.
[13] 王小川, 史峰, 郁磊, 等. Mtalab神经网络43个案例[M]. 北京: 北京航空航天大学出版社, 2013.
[14] 耿睿, 崔德光, 徐冰. 应用支持向量机的空中交通流量组合预测模型[J]. 清华大学学报自然(科学版), 2008, 48(7): 1205-1208.
[15] Nielsen, D.R. and Bouma, J. (1995) Soil Spatial Variability. Pudoc Scientific Publishers, Wageningen, 209-234.
[16] 李哈滨, 王政权, 王庆成. 空间异质性定量研究理论与方法[J]. 应用生态学报, 1998, 9(6): 651-657.
[17] 张磊. 中国石油安全体系评价研究——基于粗糙集及支持向量机方法[J]. 中国软科学, 2022(11): 13-19.
[18] Mcbratney, A.B., Minasny, B., Cattle, S.R., et al. (2002) From Pedotransfer Functions to Soil Inference Systems. Geoderma, 109, 41-73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Khaledian, Y., Kiani, F., Ebrahimi, S., et al. (2016) Assessment and Monitoring of Soil Degradation during Land Use Change Using Multivariate Analysis. Land Degradation & Development, 28, 128-141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Keshavarzi, A., Sarmadian, F., Shiri, J., et al. (2017) Application of ANFIS-Based Subtractive Clustering Algorithm in Soil Cation Exchange Capacity Estimation Using Soil and Remotely Sensed Data. Measurement, 95, 173-180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Werea, K., Bui, D.T., Dick, B., et al. (2015) A Compar-ative Assessment of Support Vector Regression, Artificial Neural Networks, and Random Forests for Predicting and Mapping Soil Organic Carbon Stocks Across an Afromontane Landscape. Ecological Indicators, 52, 394-403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Jafarzadeh, A.A., Pal, M., Servati, M., et al. (2016) Comparative Analysis of Support Vector Machine and Artificial Neural Network Models for Soil Cation Exchange Capacity Prediction. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 13, 87-96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Hossein, B., Naser, D. and Mohsen, J. (2014) Prediction of CEC Using Fractal Parameters by Artificial Neural Networks. International Agrophysics, 28, 143-152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Khodaverdiloo, H., Momtaz, H. and Liao, K. (2018) Performance of Soil Cation Exchange Capacity Pedotransfer Function as Affected by the Inputs and Database Size. Clean: Soil Air Water, 46, e1700670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef