前列腺12针系统穿刺在重复靶向穿刺中的应用价值研究
The Research Application Value of 12-Core System Prostate Biopsy in Repeated Targeted Biopsy
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2023.133698, PDF,   
作者: 欧阳奎, 蒋晓舻, 杨 睿, 袁贺佳, 吴吉涛, 赵红伟*:青岛大学附属烟台毓璜顶医院泌尿外科,山东 烟台
关键词: 前列腺癌前列腺穿刺术经会阴磁共振前列腺特异性抗原Prostate Cancer Prostate Biopsy Transperineal MRI PSA
摘要: 目的:探讨重复前列腺穿刺中12针系统穿刺联合超声磁共振靶向融合穿刺的临床应用价值。方法:回顾性分析2019年6月~2021年9月烟台毓璜顶医院泌尿外科收治的既往活检阴性但PSA > 4 ng/ml患者的临床资料,进一步筛选出PI-RADS > 2分的患者。收集并比较患者前列腺系统穿刺和前列腺靶向穿刺的结果。结果:本研究共纳入211顺利完成穿刺的患者,穿刺针数为18.3 ± 3.1,共诊断出98 (46.4%)例前列腺癌组织,其中临床有意义前列腺癌组织69例(70.4%)。靶向穿刺检出前列腺癌72例(34.1%),临床有意义前列腺癌58例(80.6%),添加系统穿刺后,前列腺癌的检出率增加26例(12.3%, p < 0.001),临床有意义前列腺癌的检出人数增加11例(5.2%, p < 0.001)。结论:对于MRI提示可疑病灶的前列腺重复穿刺患者,靶向穿刺后添加系统穿刺能有效提高前列腺癌的检出率。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the clinical application value of 12-core system biopsy combined with tar-geted fusion ultrasound magnetic resonance biopsy in repeated prostate biopsy. Methods: A retro-spective analysis of the clinical data of patients admitted to Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Urology between June 2019 and September 2021 with previous negative biopsy but PSA > 4 ng/ml was performed, and patients with PI-RADS > 2 points were further screened. The results of prostatic system biopsy and targeted prostatic biopsy were collected and compared. Results: A total of 211 patients who completed biopsy were included in this study, and the number of cores was 18.3 ± 3.1. A total of 98 (46.4%) cases of prostate cancer were diagnosed, including 69 (70.4%) cases of clini-cally significant prostate cancer. Targeted biopsy detected prostate cancer in 72 cases (34.1%) and clinically significant prostate cancer in 58 cases (80.6%). After systematic biopsy, the detection rate of prostate cancer increased by 26 cases (12.3%, p < 0.001), and clinically significant prostate can-cer was increased by 11 cases (5.2%, p < 0.001). Conclusion: For patients with repeated prostate biopsy indicated by MRI as suspicious lesions, systematic biopsy followed by targeted biopsy can effectively improve the detection rate of prostate cancer.
文章引用:欧阳奎, 蒋晓舻, 杨睿, 袁贺佳, 吴吉涛, 赵红伟. 前列腺12针系统穿刺在重复靶向穿刺中的应用价值研究[J]. 临床医学进展, 2023, 13(3): 4888-4892. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2023.133698

参考文献

[1] 中国抗癌协会泌尿男生殖系统肿瘤专业委员会前列腺癌学组. 前列腺癌筛查中国专家共识(2021年版) [J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2021, 31(5): 435-440.
[2] Turkbey, B., et al. (2011) Multiparametric 3T Prostate Magnetic Resonance Im-aging to Detect Cancer: Histopathological Correlation Using Prostatectomy Specimens Processed in Customized Mag-netic Resonance Imaging Based Molds. Journal of Urology, 186, 1818-1824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Haffner, J., et al. (2011) Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging be-fore Initial Biopsy: Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted and Systematic Biopsy for Significant Prostate Cancer Detection. BJU International, 108, E171-E178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Yerram, N.K., et al. (2012) Low Suspicion Lesions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predict for the Absence of High-Risk Prostate Cancer. BJU International, 110, E783-E788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Hansen, N., et al. (2016) Magnetic Resonance and Ultra-sound Image Fusion Supported Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Using the Ginsburg Protocol: Technique, Learning Points, and Biopsy Results. European Urology, 70, 332-340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Tan, N., et al. (2015) Characteristics of Detected and Missed Prostate Cancer Foci on 3-T Multiparametric MRI Using an Endorectal Coil Correlated with Whole-Mount Thin-Section Histopathology. American Journal of Roentgenology, 205, W87-W92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Le, J.D., et al. (2015) Multifocality and Prostate Cancer Detection by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Correlation with Whole-Mount Histopathology. European Urology, 67, 569-576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Radtke, J.P., et al. (2016) Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MRI-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Index Tumor Detection: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen. European Urology, 70, 846-853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Weinreb, J.C., et al. (2016) PI-RADS Prostate Imag-ing-Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2. European Urology, 69, 16-40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Ahmed, H.U., et al. (2011) Characterizing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Template Prostate Mapping Biopsy. Journal of Urology, 186, 458-464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Siddiqui, M.M., et al. (2015) Comparison of MR/Ultrasound Fu-sion-Guided Biopsy with Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer. JAMA, 313, 390-397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Radtke, J.P., et al. (2015) Comparative Analysis of Transperineal Template Saturation Prostate Biopsy versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Guidance. Journal of Urology, 193, 87-94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Moore, C.M., et al. (2013) Image-Guided Prostate Biopsy Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Targets: A Systematic Review. European Urology, 63, 125-140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Filson, C.P., et al. (2016) Prostate Cancer Detection with Mag-netic Resonance-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy: The Role of Systematic and Targeted Biopsies. Cancer, 122, 884-892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Wegelin O., et al. (2017) Comparing Three Different Techniques for Mag-netic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Prostate Biopsies: A Systematic Review of In-Bore versus Magnetic Resonance Im-aging-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion versus Cognitive Registration. Is There a Preferred Technique? European Urology, 71, 517-531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Marra G., et al. (2021) Transperineal Freehand Multiparametric MRI Fusion Targeted Biopsies under Local Anaesthesia for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: A Multicentre Prospective Study of 1014 Cases. BJU International, 127, 122-130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Monni, F., et al. (2017) Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Detection and Management: A Systematic Review. Minerva Urology and Nephrology, 69, 567-578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Arsov, C., et al. (2015) Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Guided In-Bore Biopsy to MRI-Ultrasound Fusion and Transrectal Ul-trasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy in Patients with Prior Negative Biopsies. European Urology, 68, 713-720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Tonttila, P.P., et al. (2016) Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy-Naive Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer Based on Ele-vated Prostate-Specific Antigen Values: Results from a Randomized Prospective Blinded Controlled Trial. European Urology, 69, 419-425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Thompson, J.E., et al. (2016) The Diagnostic Performance of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Detect Significant Prostate Cancer. Journal of Urology, 195, 1428-1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Lundström, K.J., et al. (2014) Nationwide Population Based Study of Infections after Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy. Journal of Urology, 192, 1116-1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]