冠状动脉旁路移植术与冠脉动脉介入术手术效果研究现状
Current Status of Research on the Effect of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Coronary Artery Intervention
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2023.134733, PDF,   
作者: 方万顺：山东第一医科大学研究生部，山东 济南；戴炳光*：济南市第五人民医院胸心外科，山东 济南
关键词: 冠状动脉搭桥(CABG)；经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)；药物洗脱支架；手术效果；Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG)； Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)； Drug-Eluting Stent； Surgical Effect
摘要: 冠心病(CAD)现在已经成为世界上威胁人民健康的首要疾病，对于冠心病的手术治疗，传统冠状动脉旁路移植术(Coronary artery bypass grafting, CABG)和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(Percutaneous coro-nary intervention, PCI)都已经被证实有效且被患者接受，但目前两种手术的手术效果都存在一定的问题，目前国内外正在探索减轻CABG创伤或者优化PCI的新兴技术，从而给患者提供更好的诊疗方案。
Abstract: Coronary heart disease (CAD) has become the primary disease threatening people’s health in the world. For the surgical treatment of coronary heart disease, traditional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have been proved to be effective and accepted by patients, but at present, there are some problems in the surgical effects of the two kinds of surgery. At present, new techniques to reduce CABG trauma or optimize PCI are being ex-plored at home and abroad in order to provide patients with a better diagnosis and treatment plan.
文章引用：方万顺, 戴炳光. 冠状动脉旁路移植术与冠脉动脉介入术手术效果研究现状[J]. 临床医学进展, 2023, 13(4): 5170-5174. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2023.134733

参考文献

[1] Deaton, C., Froelicher, E.S., Wu, L.H., et al. (2011) The Global Burden of Cardiovascular Disease. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 10, S5-S13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[2] Fakhrzad, N., Barouni, M., Goudarzi, R., et al. (2023) Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Coronary Arteries Bypass Grafting (CABG) and Percu-taneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) through Drug Stent in Iran: A Comparative Study. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 21, Article No. 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Alderman, E.L., Bourassa, M.G., Cohen, L.S., et al. (1990) Ten-Year Follow-up of Survival and Myocardial Infarction in the Randomized Coronary Ar-tery Surgery Study. Circulation, 82, 1629-1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[4] Al Ali, J., Franck, C., Filion, K.B. and Eisenberg, M.J. (2014) Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with First-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 7, 497-506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Yang, M., Xiao, L.-B., Gao, Z.-S. and Zhou, J.-W. (2017) Clinical Effect and Prognosis of off-Pump Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass. Medical Science Monitor, 23, 1123-1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] Stone, G.W., Kappetein, A.P., Sabik, J.F., et al. (2019) Five-Year Outcomes after PCI or CABG for Left Main Coronary Disease. New England Journal of Medicine, 381, 1820-1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] Wang, R., Serruys, P.W., Gao, C., et al. (2021) Ten-Year All-Cause Death after Percutaneous or Surgical Revascularization in Diabetic Patients with Complex Coronary Artery Disease. European Heart Journal, 43, 56-67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Habib, R.H., Dimitrova, K.R., Badour, S.A., et al. (2015) CABG versus PCI: Greater Benefit in Long-Term Outcomes with Multiple Arterial Bypass Grafting. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 66, 1417-1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Head, S.J., Milojevic, M., Daemen, J., et al. (2018) Mortality after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Stenting for Coronary Artery Dis-ease: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Data. Lancet, 391, 939-948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] Watanabe, H., Yamamoto, K., Shiomi, H., et al. (2022) Per-cutaneous Coronary Intervention Using New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Coronary Arterial Bypass Grafting in Stable Patients with Multi-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease: From the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/Cabg Registry Cohort-3. PLOS ONE, 17, e0267906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Spadaccio, C. and Benedetto, U. (2018) Coronary Artery By-pass Grafting (CABG) vs. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) in the Treatment of Multivessel Coronary Disease: Quo Vadis?—A Review of the Evidences on Coronary Artery Disease. Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 7, 506-515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Perrier, S., Kindo, M., Gerelli, S. and Mazzucotelli, J.-P. (2013) Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting or Percutaneous Revascularization in Acute Myocardial Infarction? Interactive Cardi-oVascular and Thoracic Surgery, 17, 1015-1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] D’Ascenzo, F., Barbero, U., Moretti, C., et al. (2014) Percutaneous Coro-nary Intervention versus Coronary Artery Bypass Graft for Stable Angina: Meta-Regression of Randomized Trials. Con-temporary Clinical Trials, 38, 51-58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Akintoye, E., Salih, M., Olagoke, O., et al. (2021) Intermediate and Late Outcomes with PCI vs CABG for Left Main Disease—Landmark Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. Cardio-vascular Revascularization Medicine, 23, 114-118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Stone, G.W., Sabik, J.F., Serruys, P.W., et al. (2016) Everoli-mus-Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease. New England Journal of Medicine, 375, 2223-2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] Fanari, Z., Weiss, S.A., Zhang, W., Sonnad, S.S. and Weintraub, W.S. (2015) Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Drug Eluting Stents Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients with Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Meta-Analysis of Six Randomized Con-trolled Trials. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, 16, 70-77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Gaudino, M., Freemantle, N. and Farkouh, M.E. (2020) The Co-nundrum of the Treatment for Left Main Coronary Disease. European Heart Journal, 41, 3236-3238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Javaid, A., Steinberg, D.H., Buch, A.N., et al. (2007) Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Drug-Eluting Stents for Patients with Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease. Circulation, 116, I-200-I-206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[19] Hu, X. and Wang, Y. (2021) Importance of Com-plete Revascularization and Surgical Techniques When Comparing Outcomes of CABG with PCI. American Heart Journal, 236, 107-108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Kitahara, H., Hirai, T., Mccrorey, M., et al. (2019) Hybrid Coronary Revascularization: Midterm Outcomes of Robotic Multivessel Bypass and Percutaneous Inter-ventions. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 157, 1829- 1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Heran, B.S., Chen, J.M., Ebrahim, S., et al. (2011) Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation for Coronary Heart Disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, No. 7, Article No. CD001800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 

为你推荐