大学生共情能力对内隐合作态度与合作行为的影响
The Influence of College Students’ Empathy on Implicit Cooperative Attitude and Behavior
DOI: 10.12677/ASS.2023.124219, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 于 洋, 孙 红, 张 雨:泰山学院教师教育学院,山东 泰安;王翠虹:即墨区潮海第四小学,山东 青岛
关键词: 合作共情内隐联想测验囚徒困境Cooperation Empathy Implicit Association Test Prisoners’ Dilemma
摘要: 目的:探究大学生共情能力对内隐合作态度与合作行为的影响,为培养大学生合作素养提供新思路。方法:采用中文版《人际反应指针量表》对山东省某高校259名大学生的共情能力进行调查,并区分高、低共情组。通过内隐联想测验(IAT)和囚徒困境游戏(PDG)分别考察大学生共情能力对内隐合作态度和合作行为的影响。结果:高共情组被试的内隐合作态度显著大于低共情组,高共情组被试在囚徒困境游戏中的合作行为显著高于低共情组被试。结论:高共情大学生在社会互动中更容易表现出合作态度和合作行为,这为从共情能力入手培养大学生的合作素养提供了实证依据。
Abstract: Objective: To explore the influence of college students’ empathy on implicit cooperative attitude and behavior, so as to provide new ideas for promoting college students’ cooperation. Method: The Chinese version of Interpersonal Reactivity Index was used to investigate the empathy ability of 259 college students from a university in Shandong Province, and high and low empathy groups were divided according to the scores. Then the Implicit Association Test (IAT) and Prisoner’ Dilemma Game (PDG) were used to investigate the effect of college students’ empathy on implicit cooperative attitude and cooperative behavior. Results: The implicit cooperative attitude of the high empathy group was significantly higher than that of the low empathy group, and the cooperative behavior of the high empathy group was significantly higher than that of the low empathy group. Conclusion: High empathy college students are more likely to show cooperative attitude and cooperative behavior in social interaction, which provides experimental support for cultivating college students’ cooperative literacy from the perspective of empathy ability.
文章引用:于洋, 王翠虹, 孙红, 张雨. 大学生共情能力对内隐合作态度与合作行为的影响[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2023, 12(4): 1617-1623. https://doi.org/10.12677/ASS.2023.124219

参考文献

[1] 郝娜, 崔丽莹. 补偿他人还是保护自己?内疚与羞耻情绪对合作行为的影响差异[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(7): 1626-1636.
[2] 陈晓秋, 范为桥. 合作行为研究综述: 社会认知理论的视角[J]. 心理学通讯, 2020, 3(3): 186-194.
[3] Zeng, Y. (2021) Evolutionary Prisoner Dilemma Game in Intertemporal Situation. World Scientific Research Journal, 7, 84-92.
[4] 高炎东, 谢茜. 论个人理性与集体理性[J]. 中国城市经济, 2010(7X): 247.
[5] 李颖, 袁利. 大学生合作型亲社会行为的影响因素研究[J]. 现代教育, 2011(24): 226-228.
[6] Decety, J., Bartal, I.B.A., Uzefovsky, F. and Knafo-Noam, A. (2016) Empathy as a Driver of Prosocial Behaviour: Highly Conserved Neurobehavioural Mechanisms across Species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371, Article 20150077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] 安连超, 张守臣, 王宏, 马子媛, 赵建芳. 共情对大学生亲社会行为的影响: 道德推脱和内疚的多重中介作用[J]. 心理学探新, 2018, 38(4): 350-355.
[8] 丁凤琴, 陆朝晖. 共情与亲社会行为关系的元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(8): 1159-1174.
[9] 何怡娟, 胡馨木, 买晓琴. 共情关怀对公平决策的影响——来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(4): 385-397.
[10] 林宛儒, 连榕, 刘建榕. 社会性发展迟滞大学生对社交信息的内隐态度[J]. 心理科学, 2020, 43(2): 340-346.
[11] Yang, Y., Hong, S., Fengqiang, G. and Lei, H. (2019) Neurocognitive Deficits in Shy College Students: An Event-Related Potential Analysis of the p3 Component Evoked by Evaluations of Others. Personality and Individual Differences, 138, 40-47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 詹志禹. 年龄、性别角色、人情取向与同理心的关系[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 台北: 台湾政治大学教育研究所, 1986.
[13] Greenwald, A.G., Poehlman, T.A., Uhlmann, E.L. and Banaji, M.R. (2009) Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-Analysis of Predictive Validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17-41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] 朱琳琳. 大学生外显、内隐竞争与合作态度的关系及其对成就动机的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 陕西师范大学, 2012.
[15] 刘耀中, 窦凯. 人际控制感对合作行为的影响: 一项囚徒困境的ERPs研究[J]. 心理科学, 2015, 38(3): 643-650.
[16] 陈军. 共情神经科学: 探索亲社会行为、利他主义和道德的生物学基础[J]. 学习与探索, 2019(7): 139-147.
[17] 郑君君, 蔡明, 李诚志, 邵聪. 决策框架、心理距离对个体间合作行为影响的实验研究[J]. 管理评论, 2017, 29(5): 102-109.