基于AHP-模糊综合评价法的上海市托育服务质量研究
A Study on the Quality of Childcare Services in Shanghai Based on AHP-Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method
摘要: 随着三孩政策的落地,托育服务问题成为了影响家庭多孩生育意愿的关键。上海作为托育服务领域的先行者,研究上海托育服务质量更具有实际与借鉴意义。本文以上海市托育服务机构为研究对象,利用专家访谈和问卷调查相结合的方式,对托育服务质量的影响因素进行分层,确定托育机构设备设施、师资力量、机构管理与服务和家托互动为一级指标,并进一步细分出18个影响因素作为二级指标。在此基础上利用层次分析法,将各层指标进行量化并建立评价模型及判断矩阵,从而确立各级指标权重。最后建立模糊综合评价模型,得出上海市托育服务质量综合得分为3.802,评价结果较高。
Abstract: With the implementation of the three-child policy, the issue of childcare services has become the key to influence families’ willingness to have more children. As a pioneer in the field of childcare services, it is more practical and informative to study the quality of childcare services in Shanghai. This paper takes Shanghai childcare service institutions as the research object and uses a combination of expert interviews and questionnaires to stratify the influencing factors of childcare service quality, and determines the equipment and facilities of childcare institutions, teacher strength, institutional management and service, and family care interaction as the primary indicators, and further subdivides 18 influencing factors as the secondary indicators. On this basis, the hierarchical analysis method was used to quantify the indicators at each level and establish the evaluation model and judgment matrix, so as to establish the weights of indicators at each level. Finally, a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model was established, and a comprehensive score of 3.802 was obtained for the quality of childcare services in Shanghai, which is a high evaluation result.
文章引用:孙佳怡. 基于AHP-模糊综合评价法的上海市托育服务质量研究[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2023, 13(2): 762-769. https://doi.org/10.12677/ORF.2023.132078

参考文献

[1] Yavorsky, J.E. and Ruppanner, L. (2022) An Argument for Universal Preschool and Childcare in the U.S. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 41, 922-929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] 杨雪燕, 井文, 王洒洒, 高琛卓. 中国0-3岁婴幼儿托育服务实践模式评估[J]. 人口学刊, 2019, 41(1): 5-19.
[3] 杨菊华. 托育服务体系建设的意义、问题和路径[J]. 人民论坛, 2021(28): 60-64.
[4] 曾晓东. 不同国家托育服务治理模式的效果评价——基于OECD家庭数据库的比较分析[J]. 人口学刊, 2022, 44(4): 70-79.
[5] 胡马琳, 蔡迎旗. 我国0-3岁婴幼儿托育政策的价值取向变迁研究[J]. 教育学术月刊, 2021(10): 40-48.
[6] 陈宁, 高卫星, 陆薇, 张原震. 婴幼儿托育机构发展瓶颈、政策需求与治理取向——基于河南省2679个托育机构的调查[J]. 人口研究, 2022, 46(2): 117-128.
[7] 但菲, 张德佳, 索长清. 重视并提高托育过程质量: OECD的建议及其启示[J]. 学前教育研究, 2022(12): 11-21.
[8] 洪秀敏, 王靖渊, 朱文婷. 第四代评价理论视域下国际托育机构质量评价的价值意蕴、路径选择及启示[J]. 教育发展研究, 2022, 42(2): 28-35+46.