基于熵权TOPSIS法的抽水蓄能电站财务综合评价研究
Comprehensive Financial Evaluation of Pumped Storage Power Plants Based on the Entropy-Weighted TOPSIS Method
摘要: 为研究国内抽水蓄能电站财务综合评价方法，本文综合考虑抽水蓄能电站的成本和利润来源，选取容量电价、电量电价、单位千瓦静态投资和设计年发电量四个参数，通过熵权TOPSIS法对抽水蓄能电站财务情况进行评判、排序。发现抽水蓄能电站容量电价和建设成本对项目的财务收益影响相对较大。该方法为行业领域提供一个新的研究思路，具有较好的研究价值。
Abstract:
In order to study the comprehensive financial evaluation method of domestic pumped storage power plants, four parameters, namely capacity tariff, electricity tariff, static investment per kilowatt and design annual power generation, are selected for analysis, considering both cost and profit sources of pumped storage power plants. The financial situation of pumped storage power plants is judged and ranked by the entropy-weighted TOPSIS method, and it is found that the capacity tariff and construction cost of pumped storage power plants have a relatively large impact on the financial returns of the projects. This method provides a new research idea for the industry field and has good research value.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
中国水力发电工程学会. 中国抽水蓄能电站建设[M]. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2000.
|
|
[2]
|
彭天波, 刘晓亭. 我国抽水蓄能电站建设经营现状分析[J]. 电力技术, 2004, 37(12): 38-42.
|
|
[3]
|
邵春峰. 新电改下抽水蓄能电站电价形成机制探讨[J]. 中国经贸, 2015(23): 96-97.
|
|
[4]
|
胡永宏. 对TOPSIS法用于综合评价的改进[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2002, 32(4): 572-575.
|
|
[5]
|
高永, 王玖, 石德文. 加权TOPSIS法综合评价在Excel中的实现[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2007, 24(4): 428-429.
|
|
[6]
|
张春生. 抽水蓄能电站设计: 全2册[M]. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2012.
|
|
[7]
|
白云鹏, 张彦东, 李晓军. 辽宁大雅河抽水蓄能电站装机容量分析[J]. 东北水利水电, 2017, 35(8): 9-11.
|
|
[8]
|
王伟, 王高红, 周翔, 等. 抽水蓄能电站服务电网评价指标体系及方法[J]. 电网与清洁能源, 2010, 26(8): 88-92.
|
|
[9]
|
蒋军, 王平安, 李娴, 等. 混合预约模式下基于熵权TOPSIS法的船闸通航调度方法[J]. 水运管理, 2022, 44(11): 17-21+35.
|
|
[10]
|
戴剑勇, 黄晓庆, 王雯雯. 基于改进TOPSIS的道路交通风险网络排序研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 41(4): 33-39.
|