力动态理论视角下儿童言语行为语力的个案研究
A Case Study of Children’s Illocutionary Force from the Perspective of Force Dynamics Theory
摘要: 学龄前儿童言语的社会互动性较弱,具有以自我为中心的特点,但这并不意味着儿童言语行为不具有语力。相反,在对话互动过程中,儿童能够通过话语向听话人(家长、老师、同伴等)施加力的作用,促使听话人的状态发生变化。本文基于Leonard Talmy (2000)的力动态理论,对一名4岁5月龄的汉语儿童的言语行为语力进行个案研究,以阐释对话中话论转换时儿童言语行为的语力动态变化过程。本研究发现,儿童的言语行为主要包括阻止式、否认式、称赞式、指令式、协商式和陈述式,并有相应的语力标记。本文通过语力–动态模型分析儿童言语行为的语力,较为直观地展现了儿童言语行为在交际中的作用过程,有助于增进我们对儿童语言能力发展和语言习得过程的认识,从而为认知语用学研究提供一定的研究启示。
Abstract: Preschoolers’ speech is less socially interactive and self-centered, but this does not mean that children’s speech acts do not have illocutionary force. On the contrary, children can exert force on the hearer (parents, teachers, peers, etc.) through utterances in a dialogue, so as to change the hearer’s state. Based on Leonard Talmy’s (2000) force-dynamic model, this paper conducts a case study of a 4-year-old Mandarin-speaking child’s speech acts in order to explain the dynamic change process of children’s illocutionary force during turn-taking in conversations. The present study finds that children’s speech acts mainly include preventing, negating, praising, commanding, negotiating, and stating, which have corresponding illocutionary force indicators. This paper analyzes the illocutionary force of children’s speech acts through the illocutionary force-dynamic model, which intuitively demonstrates the function process of children’s speech acts in communication, and helps to enhance our understanding of the development of children’s language ability and the process of language acquisition, thus providing some research insights into cognitive pragmatics.
文章引用:杨婧. 力动态理论视角下儿童言语行为语力的个案研究[J]. 现代语言学, 2023, 11(4): 1592-1602. https://doi.org/10.12677/ML.2023.114214

参考文献

[1] 旭红. 英语教学要遵循儿童认知特点[J]. 中国教育学刊, 2016(1): 103.
[2] 何思颖, 李姗泽. 儿童语用能力研究及其对学前教育的启示[J]. 教育与教学研究, 2021, 35(3): 50-62.
[3] 段芸. 言语行为语力的认知语言学研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2011.
[4] Austin, J.L. (1962) How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[5] 连毅卿. 语用学视角下的取效行为[J]. 山西师大学报(社会科学版), 2011, 38(S1): 94-95.
[6] Searle, J.R. (1969) Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 顾曰国. 奥斯汀的言语行为理论: 诠释与批判[J]. 外语教学与研究, 1989(1): 30-39+80.
[8] Du Bois, J.W. (2014) Towards a Dialogic Syntax. Cognitive Linguistics, 25, 359-410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Talmy, L. (2000) Toward a Cognitive Semantics. MIT Press, Cambridge.
[10] 刘森林. 语用力动力场理论探讨[J]. 外语教学, 2010, 31(5): 30-35.
[11] 莫启扬, 段芸. 言语行为语力的认知语言学研究[J]. 外语研究, 2012(3): 21-26.
[12] 程璐璐, 尚晓明. 儿童语用发展取效行为的语力探讨——以认知语言学为视角[J]. 学术交流, 2017(5): 163-167.
[13] Johnson, M. (1987) The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Sweetster, E. (1990) From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 江桂英, 孙少文. 言语行为中取效行为和取效效果的认知研究[J]. 外语学刊, 2018(5): 35-39.
[16] 李水. 力动态理论视阈下策略的取效行为研究[J]. 外语学刊, 2021(2): 28-34.
[17] Hernández, L.P. and de Mendoza, F.J.R. (2002) Grounding, Semantic Motivation, and Conceptual Interaction in Indirect Directive Speech Acts. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 259-284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 吴淑琼. 立法文本中禁止类言语行为的力动态研究[J]. 外国语文, 2019, 35(3): 88-95.