基于多目标灰狼算法的H13模具钢铣削工艺优化研究
Research on Optimization of H13 Die Steel Milling Process Based on Multi-Objective Grey Wolf Algorithm
DOI: 10.12677/ORF.2023.132111, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 卢相林, 江小辉, 郭淼现:上海理工大学机械工程学院,上海;汪 龙, 罗 超, 林志俭:阿帕斯数控机床制造有限公司,上海
关键词: 模具钢铣削GA-BP神经网络多目标优化灰狼优化算法Die Steel Milling GA-BP Neural Network Multi-Objective Optimization Gray Wolf Optimization Algorithm
摘要: 模具产品在结构上多为复杂型腔,具有高精度、多特征、难加工等特点,而在模具加工有着显著优势的高速铣削加工,最优的铣削工艺参数选择影响着工件的生产效率、表面质量。首先采用了正交试验设计方法,开展了H13模具钢铣削试验,对结果进行了极差分析,并采用GA-BP神经网络构建了表面粗糙度预测模型;其次,以建立的GA-BP表面粗糙度预测模型和材料去除率为目标函数,相关工艺参数为主要优化变量,基于多目标灰狼优化算法,建立多目标铣削参数优化模型。结果表明,铣削工艺参数对表面粗糙度的影响敏感性排序为:主轴转速 > 切宽 > 进给速度 > 切削深度;所建立的GA-BP神经网络预测模型能够有效预测加工表面粗糙度,平均相对误差为8.72%;并通过实例验证了优化的工艺参数,对比优化前,材料去除率提高了40.1%,表面粗糙度降低了36.4%,加工时间减少了29.3%。
Abstract: Die products are in the structure of complex cavity, with high precision, multi-features, difficult to process and other characteristics, and have a significant advantage of high-speed milling processing in the die processing, the optimal milling process parameters affect the production efficiency of the workpiece, surface quality. Firstly, the orthogonal experimental design method was used to carry out the milling experiment of H13 die steel, the range analysis of the results was carried out, and the GA-BP neural network was used to construct the surface roughness prediction model. Secondly, with the established GA-BP surface roughness prediction model and material removal rate as the objective function and related process parameters as the main optimization variables, a multi-objective milling parameter optimization model was established based on the multi-objective grey wolf optimization algorithm. The results show that the sensitivity of milling parameters to surface roughness is in the order of spindle speed > cutting width > feed speed > cutting depth. The GA-BP neural network prediction model can effectively predict the machining surface roughness, and the average relative error is 8.72%. The optimized process parameters are verified by an example. Compared with before optimization, the material removal rate is increased by 40.1%, the surface roughness is reduced by 36.4%, and the processing time is reduced by 29.3%.
文章引用:卢相林, 江小辉, 汪龙, 郭淼现, 罗超, 林志俭. 基于多目标灰狼算法的H13模具钢铣削工艺优化研究[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2023, 13(2): 1072-1081. https://doi.org/10.12677/ORF.2023.132111

参考文献

[1] 程德俊, 全宏杰, 张春燕. 球头铣刀切削加工表面形貌仿真技术研究[J]. 江苏科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 35(4): 38-43.
[2] 潘丽美, 钱炜, 刘金, 等. 基于切削振动的铣削表面形貌仿真与试验研究[J]. 机械强度, 2022, 44(1): 59-67.
[3] 张烘州, 明伟伟, 安庆龙, 等. 响应曲面法在表面粗糙度预测模型及参数优化中的应用[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2010, 44(4): 447-451.
[4] 石文天, 王西彬, 刘玉德, 等. 基于响应曲面法的微细铣削表面粗糙度预报模型与试验研究[J]. 中国机械工程, 2009, 20(20): 2399-2402.
[5] 张宏基, 葛媛媛. AZ91D镁合金高速铣削表面粗糙度及形貌表征研究[J]. 组合机床与自动化加工技术, 2018(10): 129-133.
[6] 苏晓云, 汪建新, 辛李霞. 基于神经网络的铣削大理石表面粗糙度预测模型[J]. 表面技术, 2017, 46(8): 274-279.
[7] 吴德会. 基于最小二乘支持向量机的铣削加工表面粗糙度预测模型[J]. 中国机械工程, 2007(7): 838-841.
[8] 郑刚, 马旌超, 吴雁, 等. 基于模糊预测的铣削工艺参数优选方法研究[J]. 组合机床与自动化加工技术, 2020(1): 136-140.
[9] Azlan, M.Z., Habibollah, H. and Safian, S. (2009) Application of GA to Optimize Cutting Conditions for Minimizing Surface Roughness in End Milling Machining Process. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 4650-4659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Jafarian, F., Taghipour, M. and Amirabadi, H. (2013) Ap-plication of Artificial Neural Network and Optimization Algorithms for Optimizing Surface Roughness, Tool Life and Cutting Forces in Turning Operation. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 27, 1469-1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 吴玲, 左健民, 王保升, 等. 基于遗传算法的铣削参数优化[J]. 组合机床与自动化加工技术, 2014(4): 108-111.
[12] 邹世铭, 方成刚. 基于APSO-BP神经网络的齿轮表面粗糙度预测模型研究[J]. 工具技术, 2021, 55(6): 47-51.
[13] 梁爽, 唐晓, 江磊, 等. GA-BP神经网络预测钛合金表面粗糙度[J]. 机械设计与制造, 2019(8): 265-268.
[14] 张晓凤, 王秀英. 灰狼优化算法研究综述[J]. 计算机科学, 2019, 46(3): 30-38.
[15] Seyedali, M., Seyed, M.M. and Andrew, L. (2014) Grey Wolf Optimizer. Ad-vances in Engineering Software, 69, 46-61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Mirjalili, S., et al. (2016) Multi-Objective Grey Wolf Optimizer: A Novel Algorithm for Multi-Criterion Optimization. Expert Systems with Applications, 47, 106-119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef