基于计划行为理论的电动自行车抢行行为研究
Research on Bicycle Rush Behavior Based on Planned Behavior Theory
DOI: 10.12677/SA.2023.122050, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 陈梦玲, 王 路, 李佳壕, 熊湘瑞彤:江苏大学土木工程与力学学院,江苏 镇江
关键词: 抢行行为计划行为理论风险感知人格特质Act of Rushing Traffic Theory of Planned Behavior Risk Perception Personality Trait
摘要: 电动自行车作为便捷、成本较低的交通工具,现已成为大众出行的重要工具,但电动自行车驾驶人不安全行为导致的安全事故数却一直居高不下,成为社会关注的焦点。为减少电动自行车因抢行行为而导致的交通安全问题,探究其背后的影响因素,研究基于计划行为理论(TPB),增加风险感知及人格特质两个重要变量,构建了抢行行为模型,设计电动自行车抢行行为调查问卷及简易版人格特质调查问卷。通过数据采集与相关性分析,最终验证了抢行行为的危险性及其影响要素,并提出了有效建议。
Abstract: As a convenient and low-cost means of transportation, electric bicycles have become an important tool for public travel. However, the number of safety accidents caused by unsafe behaviors of electric bicycle drivers has been high, which has become the focus of social attention. In order to reduce traffic safety problems caused by rushing behavior of electric bicycles, explore the influencing factors behind it. Based on the theory of planned behavior (TPB), two important variables of risk perception and personality trait are added, a rushing behavior model is constructed, and a questionnaire on rushing behavior and a simple version of personality trait questionnaire are designed. Through data collection and structural equation model analysis, the risk of rush behavior and its influencing factors are finally verified, and effective suggestions are put forward.
文章引用:陈梦玲, 王路, 李佳壕, 熊湘瑞彤. 基于计划行为理论的电动自行车抢行行为研究[J]. 统计学与应用, 2023, 12(2): 455-460. https://doi.org/10.12677/SA.2023.122050

参考文献

[1] 微出行工具关注度提高:预计2022年中国电动自行车保有量超4亿[EB/OL]. https://www.163.com/dy/article/GPL9JAOA051481OF.html, 2021-11-25.
[2] Lee, J.D. (2008) Fifty Years of Driving Safety Research. Human Factors: The Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomic Society, 50, 521-528.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 段冀阳, 李志忠. 风险驾驶行为影响因素的研究综述[J]. 人类工效学, 2013, 19(2): 86-91.
[4] 张凡, 吕卉焘, 沈小燕, 刘浩学. 计划行为理论下外卖配送员闯红灯行为研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(5): 1-6.
[5] 李英帅, 张旭, 王卫杰, 居潇凡. 基于随机森林的电动自行车骑行者事故伤害程度影响因素分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(1): 196-200.
[6] 徐程, 管满泉. 电动自行车交通事故严重程度影响因素分析——以杭州市为例[J]. 中国人民公安大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 24(3): 75-80.
[7] 张磊, 任刚, 王卫杰. 基于计划行为理论的自行车不安全行为模型研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2010, 20(7): 43-48.
[8] Zemore, S.E. and Ajzen, I. (2014) Predicting Substance Abuse Treatment Completion Using a New Scale Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 46, 158-167.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] 秦雅琴, 李秋谷, 谢济铭. 驾驶人风险感知研究综述[J]. 昆明理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 46(5): 125-138.
[10] McCrae, R.R. and Costa, P.T. (1995) Trait Explanations in Personality Psychology. European Journal of Personality, 9, 231-252.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Horswill, M.S. (2016) Hazard Perception in Driving. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25, 425-430.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] de Vries, J., de Koster, R., Rijsdijk, S. and Roy, D. (2017) Determinants of Safe and Productive Truck Driving: Empirical Evidence from Long-Haul Cargo Transport. Transportation Research Part E, 97, 113-131.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Shi, X. and Zhang, L. (2017) Effects of Altruism and Burnout on Driving Behavior of Bus Drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 102, 110-115.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Cheng, A.S.K., Ting, K.H., Liu, K.P.Y. and Ba, Y.T. (2016) Impulsivity and Risky Decision Making among Taxi Drivers in Hong Kong: An Event-Related Potential Study. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 95, 387-394.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] 葛燕, 熊悦欣, 瞿炜娜, 等. 早晚型驾驶员的认知和行为差异[C]//中国心理学会. 第十九届全国心理学学术会议摘要集. 2016: 71-72.
[16] 刘玲莉, 田东东, 王子越. 私家车驾驶员驾驶行为与人格特质的关系研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(1): 13-18.
[17] Cattell, R.B. (1943) The Description of Personality: Basic Traits Resolved into Clusters. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38, 476-506.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Eysenck, S.B.G. and Eysenck, H.J. (1978) Impulsiveness and Venturesomeness: Their Position in a Dimensional System of Personality Description. Psychological Reports, 43, 1247-1255.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Tupes, E.C. and Christal, R.E. (1992) Recurrent Personality Factors Based on Trait Ratings. Journal of Personality, 60, 225-251.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] 陈艾琳. 大五人格特质与风险偏好之间的关系研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2018.
[21] 窦广波, 宋熙, 常若松. 人格对驾驶员危险知觉技能的影响[J]. 辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 39(4): 46-50.