从著作权角度分析剽窃作品的演绎作品之正当性
Analyzing the Legitimacy of Plagiarized Works from the Perspective of Copyright
摘要: 随着互联网时代的到来,网络小说ip改编行业得到快速发展,同名电视剧或电影等作品作为网络小说改编权行使的产物,因网络小说多次陷入抄袭风波的事实而存在模糊性,学界对于剽窃作品、演绎作品相关方面均作出过讨论。目前学界基本上都在研究剽窃作品或演绎作品侵权问题,并没有研究过剽窃作品的演绎作品著作权问题。剽窃作品当然不受著作权法保护,却存在本不应被行使的“改编权”并产生相关演绎作品。剽窃者在已知作品抄袭不受著作权保护的情况下仍然行使“著作财产权”对改编者是否应当承担一定责任。本文基于以上问题从著作权法视角围绕剽窃作品之演绎作品展开讨论。
Abstract: With the advent of the Internet era, ip adaptations of online novels have been developing rapidly, and works such as TV series or movies of the same name are adapted as online novels. The product of the exercise of editorial rights is ambiguous due to the fact that online novels have repeatedly fallen into plagiarism storms, and the academic community is interested in plagiarizing works and interpreting works. Discussions have taken place. At present, the academic circles are basically studying the problem of plagiarized works or infringement of deductive works, and have not studied the problem of copyright of deductive works of plagiarized works. Of course, plagiarized works are not protected by the copyright law, but there is a “right of adaptation” that should not be exercised and the related interpreted works are produced. Should the plagiarist be liable to the adaptor for exercising his “copyright” even though he knows that the plagiarized work is not protected by copyright? Based on the above issues, this article discusses the issue of the derivative works of plagiarized works from the perspective of copyright law.
文章引用:邢诗翎. 从著作权角度分析剽窃作品的演绎作品之正当性[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2023, 12(4): 2001-2008. https://doi.org/10.12677/ASS.2023.124272

参考文献

[1] 曾一果, 杜紫薇. 数字媒介时代网络文学IP改编的再思考[J]. 中国编辑, 2021(6): 75-78.
[2] 丁丽. 版权制度的诞生: 从古登堡印刷术到安娜女王法[J]. 编辑之友, 2016(7): 100-102.
[3] Ginsburg, J.C. (1990) A Tale of Two Copyrights: Literary Property in Revolutionary France and America. Tulane Law Review, 64, 991-1031.
[4] 王迁. 著作权法[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社北京, 2006: 9.
[5] 郑成思. 版权法上[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 1990: 78.
[6] 王国柱. 作品剽窃司法认定的关键问题评析[J]. 出版发行研究, 2017(9): 67-69.
[7] 徐小奔. 人工智能“创作”的人格要素[J]. 求索, 2019(6): 95-102.
[8] 王国柱. 论著作权法对剽窃侵权的独立规制[J]. 法商研究, 2020, 37(3): 183-196.
[9] 施文高. 比较著作权法制[M]. 台北: 三民书局, 1993: 818.
[10] 来小鹏. 知识产权法[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2008: 100.
[11] 梁志文. 论演绎权的保护范围[J]. 中国法学, 2015(5): 140-157.
[12] 范世琦. 新型态演绎作品著作权保护研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 中国政法大学, 2020.
[13] 苗成林. 基于演绎行为扩张理论的演绎权侵权研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2020.
[14] 张今. 著作权归属意义上“可单独使用的作品”之界定与权利行使研究[J]. 法学杂志, 2020, 41(6): 1-10.
[15] 谢艳华, 孙淑云. 演绎作品著作权归属分析[J]. 科技与出版, 2005(6): 38-40.
[16] 雷炳德. 著作权法[M]. 张恩民, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2004: 177.