合同履行障碍合同法解决机制
Settlement Mechanism of Contract Law on Obstacles to Contract Performance
摘要: 所谓合同履行障碍,在客观上表现为当事人因不可抗力或自身原因不执行合同规定义务的行为。我国合同履行障碍制度的问题种类繁杂,分类不明确,关于合同履行障碍没有具体的规定,合同履行障碍案件的认定和解决也不明确。本文以“不履行”、“义务违反”为一级连结点完善我国合同履行障碍制度的起点,其中,“不履行”是广义上的涵盖不给付、给付迟延及不良给付的意义,是从债权人的视角看债务人的义务履行情况。而“义务违反”是从债务人的视角看其义务履行情况。而作为二级层面的合同履行障碍情形则有更为丰富的表现,既可以表现为给付不能、给付迟延、积极侵害债权,也可以表现为缔约过失责任、债权人迟延、拒绝履行,还可以表现为行为基础障碍、义务侵害或者以后可能会出现的新型类型等。
Abstract: Obstacles to contract performance are objectively manifested as the parties’ failure to perform their obligations under the contract due to force majeure or their own reasons. The types of problems in the system of obstacles to contract performance in China are complex and unclear. There are no specific provisions on obstacles to contract performance, and the identification and resolution of cases of obstacles to contract performance are also unclear. This article takes “non performance” and “breach of obligation” as the primary connecting points to improve the system of obstacles to contract performance in China. Among them, “non performance” is a broad sense that covers non performance, delay in payment, and non performing performance. It is a view of the debtor’s performance from the perspective of creditors. “Breach of obligations” refers to the performance of obligations from the perspective of the debtor. As a secondary level, the situation of obstacles to contract performance has more abundant manifestations, which can be manifested as inability to pay, delay in payment, and active infringement of creditor’s rights, as well as liability for contracting negligence, creditor’s delay, and refusal to perform. It can also be manifested as behavioral basis obstacles, obligation infringement, or new types that may arise in the future.
文章引用:蒋宇. 合同履行障碍合同法解决机制[J]. 法学, 2023, 11(3): 873-881. https://doi.org/10.12677/OJLS.2023.113126

参考文献

[1] 杜景, 林卢谌. 德国新给付障碍法研究[M]. 北京: 对外经济贸易大学出版社, 2006: 1.
[2] 丁玫. 罗马法契约责任[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 1998: 208-212.
[3] 齐晓琨. 德国新旧债法比较研究[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2006: 20-23.
[4] 杜景, 林卢谌. 是死亡还是二次勃兴——《德国民法典》新债法中的给付不能制度研究[J]. 法商研究, 2005(2): 136.
[5] 王泽鉴. 民法学说与判例研究: 第四册[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 1998: 1.
[6] 蔡养军. 合同履行障碍法的历时性观察[J]. 扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2008, 12(6): 68-73, 78.
[7] 齐晓琨. 德国新、旧债法比较研究[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2006: 16-17.
[8] 杜景, 林卢谌. 债权总则给付障碍法的体系建构[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2007: 446.
[9] 王洪亮. 债法总论[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2016: 199.
[10] 佟柔.《民法通则》疑难问题的解答[M]//法律学习与研究. 第7版. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社, 1986: 83.
[11] 佟柔. 民法[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 1986: 93.
[12] 焦富民, 陆一. 合同履行障碍制度的路径选择[J]. 江海学刊, 2009(3): 228-233.
[13] 王洪亮. 我国给付不能制度体系之考察[J]. 法律科学(西北政法学院学报), 2007(5): 134-144.
[14] 杜景, 林卢谌. 债权总则给付障碍法的体系建构[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2007: 34.
[15] 杜景, 林卢谌. 债权总则给付障碍法的体系建构[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2007: 76.
[16] 杜景, 林卢谌. 债权总则给付障碍法的体系建构[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2007: 77.
[17] (德)霍尔斯特∙海因里希∙雅科布斯. 十九世纪德国民法科学与立法[M]. 王娜, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2003.
[18] 德国民法典[M]. 杜景, 林卢谌, 译. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 1999: 444.
[19] (德)卡尔∙拉伦茨. 法学方法论[M]. 陈爱娥, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2003: 138.