多孔类岩石孔隙率测量方法适用性评价——以珊瑚礁灰岩为例
Evaluating the Applicability of Porosity Measurement Methods for Porous Rock—Taking Coral Reef Limestone as an Example
DOI: 10.12677/AG.2023.135045, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 王君朋, 黄 昕, 王帅峰:同济大学地下建筑与工程系,上海;李 昀:中船第九设计研究院工程有限公司,上海
关键词: 珊瑚礁灰岩孔隙率测量水银压汞法排水法CT扫描技术阈值分割Coral Reef Limestone Porosity Measurement MIP Water-Saturated Method CT Scanning Technique Threshold Segmentation
摘要: 孔隙率是反映岩石孔隙结构发育情况的重要指标。然而对于一些孔隙结构极度发育的多孔类岩石,不同的孔隙率测量方法有着不一样的适用性。本文以中国海南省一种生物成因沉积岩——珊瑚礁灰岩为例,讨论了饱水法、水银压汞法和基于CT扫描图片的图像法这三种孔隙率测量方法对该种岩石的适用性。测量结果表明:水银压汞法和经过自适应阈值分割的图像法所测得的孔隙率数值相近,约为0.48;而饱水法的测量结果显著偏小,为0.35;而基于两种全局阈值分割方法的图像法的测量结果则偏大,约为0.55。对珊瑚礁灰岩的孔隙连通性进行分析发现珊瑚礁灰岩的孔隙连通性极好,故认为高压水银压汞法所测量得珊瑚礁灰岩孔隙率数据最为准确,同时也说明经过局部阈值分割法处理的二值化图像更适宜于珊瑚礁灰岩这类孔隙结构极度发育多孔类岩石的孔隙率计算。
Abstract: The porosity is an important index to reflect the development of pore structure of porous rock. However, for some porous rocks with extremely developed pore structure, different porosity measurement methods have different applicability. In this paper, we discuss the applicability of three porosity measurement methods, water-saturated method, mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) method and image method based on CT scanning technique, to porous rock, using a biogenic sedimentary rock, i.e., coral reef limestone, collected in Hainan Province, China, as an example. The results show that the porosity measured by the MIP method and the image method with adaptive threshold segmentation are similar, which is around 0.48; the porosity measured by the water-saturated method is significantly smaller, which is 0.35; and the porosity measured by the image method using two global threshold segmentation approaches are larger, which are approximately 0.55. The analysis of pore connectivity of the coral reef limestone sample reveals that the pore connectivity of the sample is high. Therefore, the porosity measured by the high-pressure MIP method is considered to be the most accurate, which also indicates that the binarized images processed by the local threshold segmentation method are more suitable for the porosity calculation of coral reef limestone with a hyper-developed pore structure.
文章引用:王君朋, 李昀, 黄昕, 王帅峰. 多孔类岩石孔隙率测量方法适用性评价——以珊瑚礁灰岩为例[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2023, 13(5): 473-482. https://doi.org/10.12677/AG.2023.135045

参考文献

[1] 李静, 孔祥超, 宋明水, 等. 储层岩石微观孔隙结构对岩石力学特性及裂缝扩展影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4149-4157.
[2] Pan, J.G., Wang, H.B., Li, C., et al. (2015) Effect of Pore Structure on Seismic Rock-Physics Characteristics of Dense Carbonates. Applied Geophysics, 12, 1-10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 赵延林, 曹平, 唐劲舟, 等. 岩石随机孔隙结构的三维重构模型与细观渗流分析[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 48(1): 168-176.
[4] He, M.M., Zhang, Z.Q., Zhu, J.W., et al. (2022) Correlation between the Constant Mi of Hoek-Brown Criterion and Porosity of Intact Rock. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 55, 923-936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Fakhimi, A. and Gharahbagh, E.A. (2011) Discrete Element Analysis of the Effect of Pore Size and Pore Distribution on the Mechanical Behavior of Rock. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 48, 77-85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 刘颀, 胡亚非, 熊建军. 石墨多孔材料孔隙率测定方法研究[J]. 润滑与密封, 2010, 35(10): 99-101.
[7] 李杨, 张超, 宋卫东, 等. 海底金矿岩石弹性纵波与孔隙率特性[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2021, 50(2): 239-247.
[8] 谢启红, 邵先杰, 时培兵, 等. 低温氮吸附法在页岩储层微观孔隙表征中的作用[J]. 河北工程大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 33(3): 99-103.
[9] Mastalerz, M., Schimmelmann, A., Drobniak, A., et al. (2013) Porosity of Devonian and Mississippian New Albany Shale across a Maturation Gradient: Insights from Organic Petrology, Gas Adsorption, and Mercury Intrusion. Geohorizon, 97, 1621-1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 郎颖娴, 梁正召, 段东, 等. 基于CT试验的岩石细观孔隙模型重构与并行模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1204-1212.
[11] 李祥春, 高佳星, 张爽, 等. 基于扫描电镜、孔隙-裂隙分析系统和气体吸附的煤孔隙结构联合表征[J]. 地球科学, 2022, 47(5): 1876-1889.
[12] 李杰林, 周科平, 张亚民, 等. 基于核磁共振技术的岩石孔隙结构冻融损伤试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(6): 1208-1214.
[13] 侯正瑜, 郭常升, 王景强. 南沙海域深水区表层沉积物声速与孔隙度相关关系[J]. 研究报告, 2013, 37(7): 77-82.
[14] 张季如, 陶高梁, 黄丽, 等. 表征孔隙孔径分布的岩土体孔隙率模型及其应用[J]. 科学通报, 2010, 55(27-28): 2761-2770.
[15] 白晓宇, 张明义, 李明怀, 等. 珊瑚礁地基的工程性状研究[J]. 工程勘察, 2010, 38(11): 21-25.
[16] Nakamori, T., Iryu, Y. and Yamada, T. (1995) Development of Coral Reefs of the Ryukyu Islands (Southwest Japan, East China Sea) during Pleistocene Sea-Level Change. Sedimentary Geology, 99, 215-231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Spencer, T. and Viles, H. (2002) Bioconstruction, Bioerosion and Disturbance on Tropical Coasts: Coral Reefs and Rocky Limestone Shores. Geomorphology, 48, 23-50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 曹培, 丁志军. 基于MIP和CT试验的钙质砂孔隙分布特征研究[J]. 水利与建筑工程学报, 2019, 17(3): 55-59.
[19] 李伯平, 郭冬发, 李黎. 三维X-CT成像技术在岩石矿物中的应用[J]. 世界核地质科学, 2020, 37(4): 296-315.
[20] 王茜茜, 彭中, 刘莉. 一种基于自适应阈值的图像分割算法[J]. 北京理工大学学报, 2003, 23(4): 521-524.
[21] Otsu, N. (1979) A Threshold Selection Method from Gray-Level Histograms. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 9, 62-66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] 张丽, 李潇, 吴皓天, 等.基于最大类间方差的图像分割算法研究[J]. 科技创新与应用, 2021, 8: 39-41.
[23] Wan, H.B., Huang, X., Wang, J.P., et al. (2023) Importance of Appropriate Segmentation in Pore Structure Analysis of Coral Reef Limestone from CT Images. Marine Georesources and Geotechnology, 1-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef