国际航空器融资租赁典型案例评析——商务航空公司误导性登记注销案

Typical Case Analysis of International Aircraft Financial Lease—The Case of Discharge of Misleading Registrations of Business Aviation Limited

摘要: 根据《移动设备国际利益公约》和《关于航空器设备特定问题的议定书》的规定，在案件涉及公约第40条所规定的“可予登记的非约定利益”的情形时，爱尔兰高等法院拥有对国际登记处登记官下达命令的专属管辖权。麦克唐纳法官在联合信贷公司诉商务航空公司以及Aviareto公司一案中的判决强调了缔约国根据公约第40条声明的可予登记的权利或利益的性质具有对物的特点。此外，爱尔兰高等法院对于该案件的判决也体现出法院对登记人在国际登记处进行误导性登记，滥用登记制度行为的零容忍态度。

Abstract: According to the Convention on International Interests in Mobile Equip-ment and its Protocol on Matters Specific to Aircraft Equipment, the High Court of Ireland has exclusive jurisdiction to make orders to direct the Registrar of the International Registry of Mobile As-sets in cases involving Registerable Non-consensual Interests under Article 40 of the Convention. Judge McDonald’s judgment in the UniCredit Global Leasing Export GMBH v. Business Aviation Ltd. & Aviareto Limited emphasized the fact that Registerable Non-consensual Interests under Article 40 is a broader term capable of embracing a purely ad rem personal right enforceable by recourse to the object. In addition, the decision of the Irish High Court also reflects zero tolerance against the misleading registration and treaty abuse by registrants in the International Registry.