家庭支持政策对总和生育率的影响研究
Study of the Impact of Family Support Policies on the Total Fertility Rate
摘要: 生育率是生育行为的统计结果,为了研究家庭支持政策对生育行为的影响以探讨能否通过制定相应政策提高总和生育率的可能性问题,该研究收集了经合组织35个国家2010~2017年的面板数据,采用系统GMM方法量化分析不同家庭支持政策对总和生育率的影响。结果表明:家庭现金补助对生育率起显著正向作用,k-means聚类分析发现,“社会民主模式”下的现金补助方式效果更稳定。然而,结合世界208个国家人均GDP分析显示,在高收入国家群体中,家庭现金补助政策对总和生育率发挥的作用效果小,家庭现金补助金额占GDP的比值每提高1个百分点,总和生育率提高2.1个千分点。另外,家庭实物与服务福利对总和生育率无显著影响。
Abstract: Fertility is the statistical result of fertility behavior. In order to study the impact of family support policies on fertility behavior to explore the possibility of raising the total fertility rate by formulat-ing corresponding policies, this study collected panel data from 35 OECD countries between 2010 and 2017, and quantitatively analyzed the impact of different family support policies on the total fertility rate by using systematic GMM method. The results show that family cash subsidies have a significant positive effect on fertility, and the k-means clustering analysis shows that the effect of cash subsidies in the “social democratic model” is more stable. However, combined with the analysis of per capita GDP of 208 countries in the world, in the group of high-income countries, the effect of family cash subsidy policy on the total fertility rate is small. For every 1 percentage point increase in the ratio of family cash subsidy to GDP, the total fertility rate will increase by 2.1 thousandths. In addition, family benefits in kind and services have no significant impact on the total fertility rate.
文章引用:程丹丹, 唐加山. 家庭支持政策对总和生育率的影响研究[J]. 应用数学进展, 2023, 12(5): 2159-2171. https://doi.org/10.12677/AAM.2023.125220

参考文献

[1] 国家统计局. 第七次全国人口普查主要数据结果新闻发布会答记者问[EB/OL]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/zt_18555/zdtjgz/zgrkpc/dqcrkpc/ggl/202302/t20230215_1904005.html, 2021-05-11.
[2] McDonald, P. (2006) Low Fertility and the State: The Efficacy of Policy. Population and Development Review, 32, 485-510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Neyer, G. (2013) Welfare States, Family Policies and Fertility in Europe. In: Neyer, G., Andersson, G., Kulu, H., Bernardi, L. and Bühler, C., Eds., The Demography of Europe, Springer, Dordrecht, 29-53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 盛亦男, 杨文庄. 西方发达国家的家庭政策及对我国的启示[J]. 人口研究, 2012, 36(4): 45-52.
[5] Thévenon, O. and Luci-Greulich, A. (2013) The Impact of Family Policies on Fertility Trends in Developed Countries. European Journal of Population, 29, 387-416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Gauthier, A.H. (2002) Family Policies in Industrialized Countries: Is There Convergence? Population, 57, 447-474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 吴帆. 欧洲家庭政策与生育率变化——兼论中国低生育率陷阱的风险[J]. 社会学研究, 2016, 31(1): 49-72.
[8] Sánchez-Barricarte, J.J. (2017) The Long-Term Determinants of Marital Fertility in the Developed World (19th and 20th Centuries): The Role of Welfare Policies. Demographic Research, 36, 1255-1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 朱荟, 陆杰华. 现金补贴抑或托幼服务? 欧洲家庭政策的生育效应探析[J]. 社会, 2021, 41(3): 213-240.
[10] Vignoli, D., Bazzani, G., Guetto, R., Minello, A. and Pirani, E. (2022) Uncertainty and Narratives of the Future: A Theoretical Framework for Contemporary Fertility. In: Schoen, R., Ed., Analyzing Contemporary Fertility. The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis, Vol. 51, Springer, Cham, 25-47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Kalwij, A. (2010) The Impact of Family Policy Expenditure on Fertility in Western Europe. Demography, 47, 503-519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Cohen, A., Dehejia, R. and Romanov, D. (2013) Financial Incentives and Fertility. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95, 1-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] El-Mallakh, N. (2018) Rethinking Family Policies: Fertility Choices and the Labor Market in France. Bureau d’Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg, 1-30.
[14] 彭姣, 毕忠鹏. 收入水平、家庭政策与生育率变化——西方的趋势和中国的挑战[J]. 南方人口, 2019, 34(1): 44-55.
[15] 茅倬彦, 王嘉晨, 吴美玲. 欧洲生育支持政策效果的评估及启示——基于模糊集定性比较的分析[J]. 人口与经济, 2021(2): 13-26.
[16] 陈梅, 张梦皙, 石智雷. 国外生育支持理论与实践研究进展[J]. 人口学刊, 2021, 43(6): 54-67.
[17] Ullah, S., Akhtar, P. and Zaefarian, G. (2018) Dealing with Endogeneity Bias: The Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) for Panel Data. Industrial Marketing Management, 71, 69-78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Timmer, M.P., Dietzenbacher, E., Los, B., Stehrer, R. and DeVries, G.J. (2015) An Illustrated User Guide to the World Input-Output Database: The Case of Global Automotive Production. Review of International Economics, 23, 575-605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef