基于动静态刚度和阻尼性能提升的机床立柱结构优化设计
Optimization Design of Machine Tool Column Structure Based on Dynamic and Static Stiffness and Damping Performance Improvement
摘要: 以三轴直驱立式铣床的立柱为研究对象，以最大化静刚度与固有频率为目标，采用自适应成长法，对机床立柱的加强筋布局进行优化。为同步提升机床的抗振能力，选取对加工精度最敏感的若干个模态作为目标模态，在立柱上布置多级谐质量阻尼器(TMD)系统并确定了其最优安装位置及调谐参数。机床的动静态仿真结果表明，通过该设计方法，在立柱减重8.7%的同时维持了机床原有的动静态刚度性能，并在目标模态处对结构的振动响应进行了有效的抑制，验证了加强筋-TMD组合结构的设计可行性。
Abstract: The column of a three-axis direct drive vertical milling machine was as research object. Adaptive growth method was adopted to optimize the layout of stiffeners of machine tool column, aiming at maximizing the static stiffness and natural frequency. In order to improve the anti-vibration ability of the machine tool synchronously, several modes which were most sensitive to the machining ac-curacy were selected as the target modes, a multiple TMD system was arranged on the column and its optimal installation position and tuning parameters were determined. The dynamic and static simulation results of the machine tool show that the column structure maintains the original dy-namic and static stiffness performance while the weight is reduced by 8.7%. Moreover, the vibra-tion response of the structure is effectively suppressed at the target mode, which verifies the design feasibility of the stiffener-TMD composite structure.
文章引用：张轶杰. 基于动静态刚度和阻尼性能提升的机床立柱结构优化设计[J]. 建模与仿真, 2023, 12(3): 2359-2375. https://doi.org/10.12677/MOS.2023.123217

参考文献

[1] Sigmund, O. (2001) A 99 Line Topology Optimization Code Written in Matlab. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 21, 120-127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[2] Mei, Y. and Wang, X. (2004) A Level Set Method for Struc-tural Topology Optimization and Its Applications. Advances in Engineering Software, 35, 415-441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[3] Lam, Y. and Santhikumar, S. (2003) Automated Rib Location and Optimization for Plate Structures. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 25, 35-45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[4] Ansola, R., Canales, J., Tarrago, J.A. and Rasmussen, J. (2004) Com-bined Shape and Reinforcement Layout Optimization of Shell Structures. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 27, 219-227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[5] Jiao, M., Guo, X.H. and Wan, D.D. (2012) Finite Element Analysis and Lightweight Research on the Bed of a Large Machine Tool Based on HyperWorks. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 121-126, 3294-3298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] Park, K.-S. and Youn, S.-K. (2008) Topology Op-timization of Shell Structures Using Adaptive Inner-Front (AIF) Level Set Method. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimiza-tion, 36, 43-58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] Du, J.B. and Olhoff, N. (2007) Topological Design of Freely Vibrating Continuum Structures for Maximum Values of Simple and Multiple Eigenfrequencies and Frequency Gaps. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 34, 91-110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] Dorn, W.C., Gromory, R.E. and Greeberg, H.J. (1964) Automatic Design of Optimal Structures. Journal de Mecanique, 3, 22-52.
[9] Ding, X.H. and Yamazaki, K. (2005) Adaptive Growth Technique of Stiffener Layout Pattern for Plate and Shell Structures to Achieve Minimum Compliance. Engineering Optimization, 37, 259-276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] 丁晓红, 李国杰. 箱型支撑结构加筋板布局设计方法研究[J]. 中国机械工程, 2012, 23(4): 449-453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] Zhang, H., Ding, X.H., Dong, X.H. and Xiong, M. (2018) Optimal Topology Design of Internal Stiffeners for Machine Pedestal Structures Using Biological Branching Phenomena. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 57, 2323-2338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[12] Li, B.T., Hong, J., Yan, S. and Liu, Z.F. (2013) Multidiscipline Topology Optimization of Stiffened Plate/Shell Structures Inspired by Growth Mechanisms of Leaf Veins in Nature. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2013, Article ID: 653895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[13] Li, B.T., Ge, L.H. and Hong, J. (2017) An Intelligent Computational Approach for Design Optimization of Stiffened Engineering Structures. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufactur-ing, 18, 1005-1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[14] Li, B.T., Xuan, C.B., Tang, W.H., et al. (2019) Topology Optimization of Plate/Shell Structures with Respect to Eigenfrequencies Using a Biologically Inspired Algorithm. Engineering Optimization, 51, 1829-1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[15] Fei, J.X., Lin, B., Yan, S., et al. (2017) Chatter Mitigation Using Moving Damper. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 410, 49-63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] 宋吉祥, 吴炜, 严定帮, 等. 冲击/周期载荷作用下分布式调谐质量阻尼器对响应控制的影响[J]. 上海航天(中英文), 2021, 38(1): 13-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] Brecher, C., Schmidt, S. and Fey, M. (2016) Analytic Tuning of Robust Multi-Mass Dampers. CIRP Annals, 65, 365-368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[18] Shen, L., Ding, X.H., Hu, T.N., Zhang, H. and Xu, S.P. (2021) Simultaneous Optimization of Stiffener Layout of 3D Box Structure Together with Attached Tuned Mass Dampers under Harmonic Excitations. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 64, 721-737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[19] Hu, T.N., Ding, X.H., Shen, L. and Zhang, H. (2020) Im-proved Adaptive Growth Method of Stiffeners for Three-Dimensional Box Structures with Respect to Natural Frequencies. Computers & Structures, 239, Article ID: 106330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[20] 王鹏, 杨明亮, 李哲人, 等. 基于改进遗传算法的TMD阻尼器的优化布置[J]. 机床与液压, 2019, 47(16): 17-21, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[21] 同长虹, 张小栋. 调谐质量阻尼器参数优化及其应用[J]. 振动、测试与诊断, 2007, 27(2): 146-149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 

为你推荐