我国涉外抚养纠纷的法律适用与完善进路
The Judicial Application of Conflict Rules of Foreign-Related Maintenance for Child and Its Improvement
摘要: 《涉外民事关系法律适用法》第29条是处理涉外扶养案件的冲突规范,也是弱者利益保护原则在我国立法规范中的具体体现,但该条文在实践中的适用情况并不理想。我国法院审理涉外未成年抚养纠纷的司法实践表明,该类案件的法律适用存在适用过度扩张、抚养关系与监护关系的识别偏误、法律选择的释法说理过程粗略等问题。对此,在立法层面,应当在厘清第25条、第29条及第30条的适用关系基础上,细化第29条有关“扶养”、“有利于”的规定,将该条的连结点简化为被抚养人属人法、抚养人主要财产地法。同时,通过丰富和完善域外法查明数据库,提高法官通过利益衡量寻选冲突规范的证成要求,达至规范法律适用、切实保障被抚养人利益、提高司法公信力之目的。
Abstract: Article 29 of the Law on the Legal Application of Foreign-related Civil Relations is a conflicting norm for dealing with foreign-related maintenance cases, and is also a concrete manifestation of the principle of protection of the interests of the weak in China’s legislative norms, but the application of this provision in practice is not satisfactory. The judicial practice of our courts in dealing with foreign-related minor maintenance disputes shows that the application of the law in such cases suffers from over-expansive application, misidentification of the relationship between maintenance and guardianship, and a cursory process of interpretation and reasoning on the choice of law. In this regard, at the legislative level, on the basis of clarifying the relationship between the application of Article 25, Article 29 and Article 30, the provisions of Article 29 on “maintenance” and “benefit” should be refined, and the connection points of this Article should be simplified to the personal law of the dependant, the main law of the dependant and the law of the place of property of the dependant. At the same time, by enriching and improving the database for identifying extraterritorial laws, the judges will be able to increase the requirement of evidence for the selection of conflicting norms through the weighing of interests, with the aim of regulating the application of the law, effectively protecting the interests of dependants and improving judicial credibility.
文章引用:刘彦. 我国涉外抚养纠纷的法律适用与完善进路[J]. 法学, 2023, 11(3): 1154-1163. https://doi.org/10.12677/OJLS.2023.113165

参考文献

[1] 张丽珍. 《法律适用法》“有利于”条款实施研究[J]. 西部法学评论, 2015, 118(6): 70-80.
[2] 秦红嫚. 我国法院适用“有利于保护被监护人权益的法律”之实证分析[J]. 武大国际法评论, 2021, 5(2): 92-113.
[3] 张丽珍. 涉外扶养案件法律适用的实证考察——以《法律适用法》实施以来的案例为研究对象[J]. 中国国际私法与比较法年刊, 2016(1): 76-93.
[4] 夏吟兰. 民法典未成年人监护立法体例辩思[J]. 法学家, 2018(4): 1-15+191.
[5] 李洪祥. 论我国民法典立法之亲属法体系构建的价值取向[J]. 社会科学战线, 2012(12): 176-183.
[6] 黄进, 李建坤, 杜焕芳. 2017年中国国际私法司法实践述评[J]. 中国国际私法与比较法年刊, 2018, 22(1): 99-157.
[7] 袁发强. 我国国际私法中弱者保护制度的反思与重构[J]. 法商研究, 2014, 31(6): 98-106.
[8] 刘功文. 论亲权的行使与保护[J]. 当代法学, 2003(6): 154-156.
[9] 王竹青. 论父母离婚后对未成年子女的监护[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2006(1): 89-93.
[10] 王艺. 《法律适用法》第29条司法问题探因——基于法语言学的实务分析[J]. 大连海事大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 18(6): 62-66.
[11] 杨立民. 国际私法“弱者保护原则”的实现方式评析——以我国《涉外民事关系法律适用法》为中心[J]. 云南大学学报(法学版), 2014, 27(6): 165-170.
[12] 浦伟良. 试论涉外扶养的法律适用问题[J]. 西北政法学院学报, 1988(2): 93-96.
[13] 林燕萍, 黄艳如. 外国法为何难以查明——基于《涉外民事关系法律适用法》第10条的实证分析[J]. 法学, 2014(10): 116-126.
[14] 李建忠. 论我国外国法查明方法规定的重构[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2019(1): 133-143.
[15] 邓杰. 我国外国法查明的实践困境与破解路径——基于43个海事案例的实证分析[J]. 江西社会科学, 2021(2): 182-191.
[16] 最高人民法院网. 最高人民法院域外法查明统一平台今天正式上线启动[EB/OL]. https://www.chinacourt.org/article/detail/2019/11/id/4697254.shtml, 2022-11-20.
[17] 翁杰, 李蕊. 论我国涉外民事法律适用中法官自由裁量权的适度空间[J]. 时代法学, 2021, 19(4): 31-38.
[18] 翁杰. 论涉外民事法律适用中法律选择准则问题[J]. 中国国际私法与比较法年刊, 2014, 17(1): 49-58.
[19] 秦红嫚. 我国监护制度的发展、问题与完善建议——兼评《民法典(草案)》总则中的相关规定[J]. 浙江理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 44(3): 307-319.