经颅直流电刺激联合认知康复训练对脑卒中后认知障碍的疗效观察及分析
Effect and Analysis of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined with Cognitive Rehabilitation Training on Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2023.1351172, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 宋梦涵, 朱其秀*, 高呈飞, 张 红, 刘艳林:青岛大学附属医院康复医学科,山东 青岛
关键词: 脑卒中卒中后认知障碍经颅直流电刺激Stroke Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
摘要: 目的:观察经颅直流电刺激(transcranial direct current stimulation, tDCS)联合认知康复训练对脑卒中后认知障碍(post-stroke cognitive impairment, PSCI)患者的认知功能和日常生活活动能力的临床疗效,并对其机制进行分析。方法:本研究选取符合纳入标准的36名PSCI患者,根据SPSS预先确定的随机方案,按照被选入的先后顺序分为真刺激组和假刺激组,2组患者均给予基础药物治疗(包括降压、降糖等药物)及常规康复训练(包括物理治疗、作业治疗及认知功能训练),真刺激组在此基础上给予tDCS治疗,假刺激组给予tDCS假刺激。于治疗前和治疗3周后,利用简易智力状态检查(mini mental state examination, MMSE)和蒙特利尔认知评估(montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA)观察患者认知功能的变化,采用改良Barthel指数(modified barthel index, MBI)评价患者的日常生活活动能力。结果:治疗3周后,2组患者的认知功能均有所改善,MMSE、MoCA、MBI评分较组内治疗前显著升高,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05),且真刺激组治疗3周后的MMSE、MoCA、MBI评分均显著优于假刺激组治疗3周后的MMSE、MoCA、MBI评分,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:tDCS联合认知康复训练可以有效改善PSCI患者的认知功能,提高日常生活活动能力,可以作为治疗PSCI的一种安全、有效的临床方法。
Abstract: Objective: To observe the clinical effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with cognitive rehabilitation training on cognitive function and activities of daily living in patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI), and analyze its mechanism. Methods: 36 patients with PSCI who met the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into the real stimulation group and the sham stimulation group according to the SPSS protocol, the patients in both groups were treat-ed with basic drug therapy (including antihypertensive and hypoglycemic drugs) and routine reha-bilitation training (including physical therapy, occupational therapy and cognitive function train-ing), while the patients in the true stimulation group were treated with tDCS on the basis of the above treatment, sham stimulation group was given tDCS sham stimulation. Mini mental state ex-amination (MMSE) and Montreal cognitive assessment (MOCA) were used to observe the change of cognitive function before and 3 weeks after treatment, modified barthel index (MBI) was used to evaluate the activities of daily living of the patients. Results: After 3 weeks of treatment, the cogni-tive function was improved in both groups. The scores of MMSE, MOCA and MBI in both groups were significantly higher than those before treatment (P < 0.05), the scores of MMSE, MoCA and MBI in the real stimulation group were significantly higher than those in the sham stimulation group after 3 weeks of treatment (P < 0.05). Conclusion: tDCS combined with cognitive rehabilitation training can effectively improve the cognitive function and activities of daily living in patients with PSCI, and it can be used as a safe and effective method in the clinical treatment of PSCI.
文章引用:宋梦涵, 朱其秀, 高呈飞, 张红, 刘艳林. 经颅直流电刺激联合认知康复训练对脑卒中后认知障碍的疗效观察及分析[J]. 临床医学进展, 2023, 13(5): 8379-8385. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2023.1351172

参考文献

[1] 王拥军, 李子孝, 谷鸿秋, 等. 中国卒中报告2020 (中文版) (1) [J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2022, 17(5): 433-447.
[2] Tomassoni, D., Lanari, A., Silvestrelli, G., et al. (2008) Nimodipine and Its Use in Cerebrovascular Dis-ease: Evidence from Recent Preclinical and Controlled Clinical Studies. Clinical and Experimental Hypertension (New York, N.Y.: 1993), 30, 744-766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] 尚亚茹, 李弯月, 周钰, 陈卓铭, 孙晨鸣, 李润, 颜艺凤, 卢思宇. 计算机辅助认知训练对脑卒中后认知障碍的影响[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2022, 44(8): 700-702.
[4] Faria, A.L. andrade, A., Soares, L., et al. (2016) Benefits of Virtual Reality Based Cognitive Rehabilitation through Simulated Activities of Daily Living: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Stroke Pa-tients. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 13, Article No. 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Marquez, J., Van Vliet, P., Mcelduff, P., et al. (2015) Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS): Does It Have Merit in Stroke Rehabilitation? A Systematic Review. International Journal of Stroke: Official Journal of the International Stroke Society, 10, 306-316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Im, J.J., Jeong, H., Bikson, M., et al. (2019) Effects of 6-Month At-Home Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Cognition and Cerebral Glucose Metabolism in Alzheimer’s Disease. Brain Stimulation, 12, 1222-1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Manenti, R., Brambilla, M., Benussi, A., et al. (2016) Mild Cogni-tive Impairment in Parkinson’s Disease Is Improved by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined with Physical Therapy. Movement Disorders: Official Journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 31, 715-724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] 中华医学会神经病学分会, 中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组. 中国急性缺血性脑卒中诊治指南2018 [J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2018, 51(9): 666-682.
[9] 中华医学会神经病学分会, 中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组. 中国脑出血诊治指南(2019) [J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2019, 52(12): 994-1005.
[10] 汪凯, 董强, 郁金泰, 胡盼盼. 卒中后认知障碍管理专家共识2021 [J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2021, 16(4): 376-389.
[11] 陈赟, 何志聪, 范燕明, 等. 简明精神状态量表联合蒙特利尔认知评估量表在血管性痴呆认知功能障碍中的初步应用[J]. 中国医学创新, 2019, 16(4): 77-81.
[12] 王少石, 周新雨, 朱春燕. 卒中后抑郁临床实践的中国专家共识[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2016, 11(8): 685-693.
[13] 周炯, 王荫华. 焦虑抑郁量表评价分析[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2006(10): 665.
[14] 裴芳, 孟涛, 张凯旋, 等. 简易智能状态检查量表和蒙特利尔认知评估量表在老年人认知功能障碍筛查中的比较[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2020, 20(11): 1771-1774.
[15] 唐娟娟. 蒙特利尔认知评估量表与简易精神状态量表在认知功能障碍筛查中的应用与比较[J]. 实用医院临床杂志, 2011, 8(2): 193-195.
[16] Shah, S., Vanclay, F. and Cooper, B. (1989) Improving the Sensitivity of the Barthel Index for Stroke Rehabilitation. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 42, 703-709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Carlson, M.C., Xue, Q.-L., Zhou, J., et al. (2009) Executive Decline and Dysfunction Precedes Declines in Memory: The Women’s Health and Aging Study II. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 64, 110-117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] 过秀秀, 夏思颖, 崔璨, 等. 经颅直流电刺激联合认知干预对脑梗死认知障碍患者记忆和执行功能的疗效研究[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2022, 37(8): 1057-1062.
[19] Chu, M., Zhang, Y., Chen, J., et al. (2022) Efficacy of Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Treatment of Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 21, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Manenti, R., Sandrini, M., Gobbi, E., et al. (2020) Effects of Transcra-nial Direct Current Stimulation on Episodic Memory in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Pilot Study. The Jour-nals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 75, 1403-1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Tang, Y., Xing, Y., Zhu, Z., et al. (2019) The Effects of 7-Week Cog-nitive Training in Patients with Vascular Cognitive Impairment, No Dementia (the Cog-VACCINE Study): A Random-ized Controlled Trial. Alzheimer’s & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer’s Association, 15, 605-614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] 黄桂兰, 许明, 黎帅, 等. 认知康复训练治疗脑损伤后认知功能障碍的Meta分析[J]. 中国康复, 2017, 32(2): 95-98.
[23] Stagg, C.J., Lin, R.L., Mezue, M., et al. (2013) Widespread Modulation of Cerebral Perfusion Induced during and after Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Applied to the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 33, 11425-11431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] 周鹏, 魏晋文, 孙畅, 等. 经颅直流电刺激调控大脑认知功能的研究进展[J]. 中国生物医学工程学报, 2018, 37(2): 208-214.
[25] Kuo, M.-F. and Nitsche, M.A. (2012) Effects of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation on Cognition. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, 43, 192-199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Stagg, C.J., Bachtiar, V., O’shea, J., et al. (2012) Cortical Activa-tion Changes Underlying Stimulation-Induced Behavioural Gains in Chronic Stroke. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 135, 276-284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Patel, R., Silla, F., Pierce, S., et al. (2020) Cognitive Function-ing before and after Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS): A Quantitative Meta-Analysis in Healthy Adults. Neuropsychologia, 141, Article ID: 107395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Bolzoni, F., Pettersson, L.-G. and Jankowska, E. (2013) Evidence for Long-Lasting Subcortical Facilitation by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the Cat. The Journal of Physiology, 591, 3381-3399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]