人格智力测验的中文版修订及信效度检验
Revision of the Chinese Version Test of Personal Intelligence and Its Reliability and Validity
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2023.135241, PDF,   
作者: 杨风娇:广州大学教育学院,广东 广州
关键词: 人格智力测验项目分析信度效度Test of Personal Intelligence Item Analysis Reliability Validity
摘要: 目的:翻译和修订人格智力测验(TOPI),并在大学生群体中进行项目分析和信效度检验。方法:606名大学生完成中文版TOPI,中文版情绪智力测验(EIS),606名(总样本)用于条目分析和信度检验,两样本分别进行描述性统计;其中306名(样本1)用于验证性因子分析,300名(样本2)计算校标关联效度。结果:验证性因子分析结果显示,TOPI在单因子结构中拟合结果较好。修订后的TOPI共20个项目,项目的难度偏低,鉴别力稍弱,测验的内部一致性系数为0.64,分半信度为0.57 (p < 0.01);TOPI与情绪智力测验的情绪感知(r = 0.46, p < 0.01)、自我情绪调控(r = 0.329, p < 0.01)、他人情绪调控(r = 0.42, p < 0.01)、情绪运用(r = 0.12, p < 0.05)四个维度均呈显著正相关。结论:修订后的TOPI信效度指标良好,符合测量学要求。
Abstract: Objective: To translate and revise the Test of Personal Intelligence (TOPI), and conduct item analysis and test its reliability and validity among undergraduate students. Methods: A total of 606 Chinese undergraduate students participated in this study, in which they responded to the Chinese vision of TOPI and Emotional Intelligence Scale (EIS), and 606 (total sample) were used for item analysis and reliability test. Descriptive statistics were performed for the two samples respectively. Among them, 306 (sample 1) were used for confirmatory factor analysis, and 300 (sample 2) were used to calculate calibration correlation validity. Results: The result of confirmatory factor analysis showed that TOPI had the good fitting result in the single factor structure. The revised TOPI has a total of 20 items, which are relatively low in difficulty and slightly weak in discrimination. The internal consistency coefficient of the test was 0.644, and the split and half reliability was 0.57 (p < 0.01). TOPI was significantly positively correlated with emotional perception (r = 0.46, p < 0.01), self-regulation of emotion (r = 0.33, p < 0.01), emotion regulation of others (r = 0.42, p < 0.01) and emotional application (r = 0.120, p < 0.05) of Emotional Intelligence Scale. Conclusion: The revised TOPI has good reliability and validity, and meets the requirements of surveying.
文章引用:杨风娇 (2023). 人格智力测验的中文版修订及信效度检验. 心理学进展, 13(5), 1961-1967. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2023.135241

参考文献

[1] 陈少华, 曾毅, 林志鹏(2021). 人格智力: 一种被“冷落”的“热智力”. 心理学探新, 41(2), 99-105.
[2] Atadokht, A., Mowlaie, M., Basharpour, S., & Ghaffari, M. (2019). Psychometric Properties of Persian Version of Test of Personal Intelligence (TOPI) in a Sample of Iranian University Students. Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health, 21, 25-32.
[3] Buss, D. M. (2001). Human Nature and Culture: An Evolutionary Psychological Perspective. Journal of Personality, 69, 955-978.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] DeYoung, C. G. (2011). Intelligence and Personality. In R. J. Sternberg, & S. B. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence (pp. 711-737). Cambridge University Press.[CrossRef
[5] Hatemi, P. K., Mcdermott, R., & Eaves, L. (2015). Genetic and Environmental Contributions to Relationships and Divorce Attitudes. Personality & Individual Differences, 72, 135-140).[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Mayer, J. D. (2008). Personal Intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 27, 209-232.[CrossRef
[7] Mayer, J. D. (2009). Personal Intelligence Expressed: A Theoretical Analysis. Review of General Psychology, 13, 46-58.[CrossRef
[8] Mayer, J. D. (2015). The Power of Personality. Psychologist, 28, 296-299.
[9] Mayer, J. D., & Skimmyhorn, W. (2017). Personality Attributes That Predict Cadet Performance at West Point. Journal of Research in Personality, 66, 14-26.[CrossRef
[10] Mayer, J. D., Caruso, D. R., & Panter, A. T. (2012). The Growing Significance of Hot Intelligence. American Psychologist, 67, 502-503.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Mayer, J. D., Caruso, D. R., & Panter, A. T. (2019a). Advancing the Measurement of Personal Intelligence with the Test of Personal Intelligence, Version 5 (TOPI 5). Journal of Intelligence, 7, Article No. 4.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Mayer, J. D., Lortie, B., Panter, A. T., & Caruso, D. R. (2018). Employees High in Personal Intelligence Differ from Their Colleagues in Workplace Perceptions and Behavior. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100, 539-550.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Mayer, J. D., Panter, A. T., & Caruso, D. R. (2012). Does Personal Intelligence Exist? Evidence from a New Ability-Based Measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 124-140.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Mayer, J. D., Panter, A. T., & Caruso, D. R. (2014). Test of Personal Intelligence 1.4(TOPI1.4) Manual. http://personalintelligence.info/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/TOPI1.4-Manual-Distr-Ver-2014-10-1.pdf
[15] Mayer, J. D., Panter, A. T., & Caruso, D. R. (2017). A Closer Look at the Test of Personal Intelligence (TOPI). Personality and Individual Differences, 111, 301-311.[CrossRef
[16] Mayer, J. D., Panter, A. T., & Caruso, D. R. (2018). Test of Personal Intelligence MINI MARKER-12 (TOPI MINI-12) (9th ed): Brief Manual (9th ed.). Unpublished manuscript. University of New Hampshire.
[17] Mayer, J. D., Panter, A. T., & Caruso, D. R. (2019b). Test of Personal Intelligence Brief-20 (TOPI Brief-20) Manual (2nd ed., Standard Version). Technical Report. University of New Hampshire.
[18] Mayer, J. D., Panter, A. T., & Caruso, D. R. (2020). When People Estimate Their Personal Intelligence Who Is Overconfident? Who is accurate? Journal of Personality, 88, 1129-1144.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., Caruso, D. R., & Sitarenios, G. (2001). Emotional Intelligence as a Standard Intelligence. Emotion, 1, 232-242.[CrossRef
[20] Mowlaie, M., Mikaeili, N., Aghababaei, N., Ghaffari, M., & Pouresmali, A. (2016). The Relationships of Sense of Coherence and Self-Compassion to Worry: The Mediating Role of Personal Intelligence. Current Psychology, 36, 630-636.[CrossRef
[21] Sylaska, K. M. (2016). Major Decisions: Personal Intelligence and Students’ Reasoning about College Majors. Ph.D. Thesis, University of New Hampshire.
[22] Sylaska, K. M., Allen, J. L., & Mayer, J. D. (2020). Personal Intelligence. In V. Zeigler-Hill, & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences (pp. 3517-3522). Springer.[CrossRef