焦虑对新兵集体效能感的影响:部队凝聚力的中介作用
The Effect of Anxiety on the Collective Efficacy of Recruits in Intensive Training: The Mediating Role of Force Cohesion
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2023.135242, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 李玉石, 王一澎:武警后勤学院研究生大队,天津;陈旭义, 王振国*:武警特色医学中心研究部,天津
关键词: 新兵焦虑集体效能感部队凝聚力Training of New Recruits Anxiety Collective Efficacy Force Cohesion
摘要: 目的:探索焦虑与新兵集体效能感之间的关系,同时考察部队凝聚力的中介作用,探索使用合理科学的方法手段,有效提高部队凝聚力水平。方法:采用整群抽样法对西北地区某部370名新兵进行问卷测查,使用的问卷有焦虑自评量表、陆军部队凝聚力量表、中国军人集体效能量表等。使用SPSS24.0对测查数据进行描述性统计分析、共同方法偏差检验和Bootstrap中介效应检验等。结果:1) 新兵焦虑状态检出率为14.2%;2) 焦虑与集体效能感呈显著负相关(r = −0.284, P < 0.01);与部队凝聚力呈显著负相关(r = −0.198, P < 0.01);3) 部队凝聚力在焦虑和新兵集体效能感之间起部分中介作用,中介效应比例为34.21%,95%置信区间为(−0.276, −0.074)。结论:新兵的焦虑水平可直接影响其集体效能感,也可通过部队凝聚力间接影响集体效能感。通过合理有效的心理辅导干预,降低焦虑水平,可以有助于提高集体效能感,也可通过加强部队凝聚力来间接实现。
Abstract: Objective: The relationship between anxiety and the collective efficacy of recruits in intensive training was explored, and the mediating role of troop cohesion was investigated, and the level of troop cohesion was effectively improved through reasonable and scientific methods. Methods: The whole group sampling method was used to measure 370 recruits of a department in the northwest region using questionnaires such as the Anxiety Self-Rating Scale, the Army Force Cohesion Scale, and the Chinese Soldiers’ Collective Efficacy Scale. SPSS24.0 was used to perform descriptive statistical analysis, common method bias test and Bootstrap mediation effect test. Results: 1) The detection rate of recruit anxiety was 14.2%; 2) Anxiety was significantly negatively correlated with collective efficacy (r = −0.284, P < 0.01); It was significantly negatively correlated with troop cohesion (r = −0.198, P < 0.01). 3) Force cohesion played a partial mediating role between anxiety and the collective efficacy of recruits in training, with a mediating effect ratio of 34.21% and a 95% confidence interval of (−0.276, −0.074). Conclusion: The anxiety level of recruits can directly affect their collective efficacy, and can also indirectly affect their collective efficacy through unit cohesion. Reducing anxiety levels through reasonable and effective psychological counseling interventions can help improve collective efficacy and can also be achieved indirectly by strengthening force cohesion.
文章引用:李玉石, 陈旭义, 王一澎, 王振国 (2023). 焦虑对新兵集体效能感的影响:部队凝聚力的中介作用. 心理学进展, 13(5), 1968-1974. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2023.135242

参考文献

[1] 丁玲(2014). 陆军部队凝聚力量表的修订及其相关研究. 硕士学位论文, 兰州: 西北师范大学.
[2] 李海, 张勉, 李博(2009). 组织凝聚力结构与影响因素: 案例研究及理论建构. 北京师范大学学报: 社会科学版, (6), 47-56.
[3] 李君, 李炳汝, 马培娥, 李秀芬, 王赛男(2006). 中国军人集体效能量表的效度, 信度初步分析. 解放军预防医学杂志, 24(6), 425-426.
[4] 李锐(2006). 工业与组织心理学中的集体效能感. 心理科学进展, 14(6), 924-931.
[5] 李世海(2005). 学生班级集体效能, 考试焦虑与学业成绩的相关研究. 硕士学位论文, 济南: 山东师范大学.
[6] 刘素珍, 龚殿祥, 赵华, 吴梦麟(1999). 军人焦虑, 忧郁情绪研究: I 环境, 文化, 军龄及其它. 心理科学, 22(1), 30-33+94-95.
[7] 刘贤臣, 唐茂芹, 彭秀桂, 陈琨, 戴郑生(1995). 焦虑自评量表SAS的因子分析. 中国神经精神疾病杂志, 21(6), 359-360.
[8] 邱蔚祺, 袁也丰, 周忠廷, 邹卿, 董香丽, 付伟(2019). 野外驻训官兵焦虑, 抑郁与应对方式及人格特质关系. 中国职业医学, 46(1), 61-66.
[9] 唐海波, 赵龙, 罗黄金(2014). 社会支持, 应对方式对军人适应不良和应激反应的影响. 中国健康心理学杂志, 22(3), 369-371.
[10] 陶明, 高静芳(1994). 修订焦虑自评量表(SAS-CR)的信度及效度. 中国神经精神疾病杂志, 20(5), 301-303.
[11] 肖利军, 王京生, 苗丹民(2010). 新兵社会适应评价标准的定性研究. 中国健康心理学杂志, 18(12), 1463-1464.
[12] 张仁静, 张晶轩, 王菲菲, 赵梦雪, 蒋娟, 杨春丽, 杨国愉(2020). 急进高原新兵状态-特质焦虑, 抑郁及相关因素. 中国健康心理学杂志, 28(1), 50-54.
[13] 周浩, 龙立荣(2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.
[14] Abbate, R., Cioni, G., Ricci, I., Miranda, M., & Gori, A. M. (2012). Thrombosis and Acute Coronary Syndrome. Thrombosis Research, 129, 235-240.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Bliese, P. D., & Castro, C. A. (2000). Role Clarity, Work Overload and Organizational Support: Multilevel Evidence of the Importance of Support. Work & Stress, 14, 65-73.[CrossRef
[16] Chrousos, G. P. (2009). Stress and Disorders of the Stress System. Nature Reviews Endocrinology, 5, 374-381.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Conner, M., & Norman, P. (2015). Predicting and Changing Health Behaviour: A Social Cognition Approach. In M. Conner, & P. Norman (Eds.), Predicting and Changing Health Beha-viour: Research and Practice with Social Cognition Models (pp. 1-29). Open University Press.
[18] Du Preez, J., Sundin, J., Wessely, S., & Fear, N. (2012). Unit Cohesion and Mental Health in the UK Armed Forces. Occupational Medicine, 62, 47-53.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Griffith, J. (1988). Measurement of Group Cohesion in US Army Units. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 9, 149-171.[CrossRef
[20] Griffith, J. (2002). Multilevel Analysis of Cohesion’s Relation to Stress, Well-Being, Identification, Disintegration, and Perceived Combat Readiness. Military Psychology, 14, 217-239.[CrossRef
[21] Gully, S. M., Incalcaterra, K. A., Joshi, A., & Beaubien, J. M. (2002). A Meta-Analysis of Team-Efficacy, Potency, and Performance: Interdependence and Level of Analysis as Moderators of Observed Relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 819-832.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Jones, N., Seddon, R., Fear, N. T., McAllister, P., Wessely, S., & Greenberg, N. (2012). Leadership, Cohesion, Morale, and the Mental Health of UK Armed Forces in Afghanistan. Psychiatry, 75, 49-59.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Li, J., Jia, L., Cai, Y., Kwan, H. K., & You, S. (2020). Employee-Organization Relationships and Team Performance: Role of Team Collective Efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article No. 206.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] MacDonell, G. V., Bhullar, N., & Thorsteinsson, E. B. (2016). Depression, Anxiety, and Stress in Partners of Australian Combat Veterans and Military Personnel: A Comparison with Australian Population Norms. PeerJ, 4, e2373.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Morales, D. G., Box, A. G., & Petruzzello, S. J. (2018). The Relationship among Resilience, Personality, Anxiety and Fitness in Recruit Firefighters: 1315 Board# 123 May 31 9:00 AM-10:30 AM. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 50, 312-313.[CrossRef