我国传统复仇制度的现实意义
The Practical Significance of Our Traditional System of Revenge
摘要: 我国传统的复仇行为很久以前就已经存在了,在我国漫长的历史发展过程中一直存在着,时至今日也仍然存在着。复仇行为的产生存在着历史条件及思想基础,复仇在西周时期发展为比较完备的制度,不同朝代对于复仇行为也采取了不同的态度。我国古代复仇思想可以说是礼法结合的一个缩影,在礼法结合的过程中,中国古代复仇思想由于受到儒家思想的影响较大,儒家从“礼”出发,主张应当复仇,因此很难从根本上反对复仇行为。本文主要从下面四个章节进行论述:第一章主要介绍复仇及复仇制度的概念,这一章主要是对复仇相关概念和起源的界定。第二章主要介绍不同朝代对于复仇的态度,主要有限制复仇、禁止复仇、允许复仇三种态度。第三章分析了复仇发生的原因,主要包括因亲复仇、因义复仇、因情复仇三个方面的原因。第四章分析了复仇对于现代法治的启示,对复仇制度进行研究,既可加深对中国古代法制发展的认识,并挖掘出其在当代存在的积极意义,也可从中寻找适应当下的复仇案件的处理机制,有利于构建安定祥和的社会。
Abstract:
Our traditional act of revenge has existed a long time ago and has been existed in the long process of historical de-velopment of our country and still exists today. There are historical conditions and ideological basis for the emergence of revenge behavior. Revenge developed into a relatively complete system in the Western Zhou Dynasty, and different dynasties also adopted different attitudes towards revenge behavior. It can be said that the ancient Chinese thought of revenge is an epitome of the combina-tion of rites and laws. In the process of the combination of rites and laws, the ancient Chinese thought of revenge was greatly influenced by Confucianism, which advocated revenge from “rites”, so it was difficult to oppose revenge fundamentally. This paper mainly discusses from the following four chapters: The first chapter mainly introduces the concept of revenge and revenge system, and this chapter mainly defines related concepts and origins of revenge. The second chapter mainly in-troduces the attitudes of different dynasties towards revenge, which mainly includes three atti-tudes: restricted revenge, forbidden revenge and allowed revenge. The third chapter analyzes the causes of revenge, including revenge for kinship, revenge for justice and revenge for love. The fourth chapter analyzes the enlightenment of revenge to the modern rule of law. The study of re-venge system can not only deepen the understanding of the development of ancient Chinese legal system, but also dig out its positive significance in the contemporary existence. It can also find a mechanism to deal with revenge cases that is suitable for the current situation, which is conducive to the construction of a stable and peaceful society.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
[法]拉法格. 思想起源论[M]. 王子野, 译. 上海: 生活•读书•新知三联书店, 1963: 67.
|
|
[2]
|
蒋楠楠. 法律与伦理之间: 传统中国复仇行为的正当性及限度[J]. 法学评论, 2018, 36(4): 63-72.
|
|
[3]
|
梁兴国. 法的起源: 国家性、伦理性、公共性及其它[J]. 政治与法律, 2010(8): 13-24.
|
|
[4]
|
王龙飞, 刘志. 试析同态复仇[J]. 政治与法律, 2011(10): 153-160.
|
|
[5]
|
龙大轩. 孝道: 中国传统法律的核心价值[J]. 法学研究, 2015, 37(3): 176-193.
|
|
[6]
|
司马迁. 史记[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1982: 358.
|
|
[7]
|
徐昕. 通过私力救济实现正义——兼论报应正义[J]. 法学评论, 2003(5): 26-34.
|
|
[8]
|
周永坤. 复仇的法理问题研究——以中华法系为对象[J]. 甘肃政法学院学报, 2020(4): 1-11.
|
|
[9]
|
苗鸣宇. 中国古代复仇制度初探[J]. 中国青年政治学院学报, 2002(6): 97-102.
|
|
[10]
|
明辉. 法律与复仇的历史纠缠——从古代文本透视中国法律文化传统[J]. 学海, 2009(1): 116-127.
|
|
[11]
|
苏力. 复仇与法律——以《赵氏孤儿》为例[J]. 法学研究, 2005(1): 53-69.
|
|
[12]
|
胡裕岭. 法律文化视野下的血亲复仇现象与防治对策——从张扣扣案谈起[J]. 湖北警官学院学报, 2020, 33(2): 103-110.
|
|
[13]
|
王文华. “法外复仇”传统与“仇恨犯罪”的抗制——以中国传统复仇文化为视角[J]. 法学论坛, 2011, 26(6): 53-58.
|
|
[14]
|
殷啸虎. 中国古代复仇行为合理性与合法性冲突的法律协调[J]. 政治与法律, 2022(8): 151-161.
|
|
[15]
|
何雅婷. 中国古代复仇制度考论[D]: [硕士毕业论文]. 苏州: 苏州大学, 2013.
|
|
[16]
|
迟子钧. 建构中国法治话语的正义[D]: [硕士毕业论文]. 上海: 华东政法大学, 2020.
|