伯明翰学派会话理论视角下的英语专业课堂学生话语研究
A Study of Student Discourse in English Major Classes from the Perspective of Birmingham School Conversation Theory
DOI: 10.12677/AE.2023.135448, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 杨梦莲, 费 珺, 陆 晴:苏州科技大学天平学院语言文化学院, 江苏 苏州
关键词: 伯明翰学派学生话语英语专业学生IRF会话结构交际回合Birmingham School Student Discourse English Majors IRF Conversational Structure Communicative Rounds
摘要: 伯明翰学派话语分析理论及其分析模式能够描述真实的课堂结构。该研究基于伯明翰学派的会话理论,探讨大学英语专业课堂上学生的课堂话语结构。研究发现完整的IRF虽然是存在的,但是并不常见。而且课堂互动中教师说的多,学生发言的少,要改变这种现状,有效的方法之一就是激发学生学习英语的兴趣,适当的调节课堂内容,创造性的提出学习方法等。
Abstract: The Birmingham School theory of discourse analysis and its analytical model are able to describe the real classroom structure. This study explores the classroom discourse structure of students in college English major classrooms based on the Birmingham School’s theory of conversation. The study found that complete IRF, although it exists, is not common. Moreover, the teacher speaks a lot and the students speak little in classroom interactions. One of the effective ways to change this situation is to stimulate students’ interest in learning English, adjust the classroom content appropriately, and propose creative learning methods, etc.
文章引用:杨梦莲, 费珺, 陆晴. 伯明翰学派会话理论视角下的英语专业课堂学生话语研究[J]. 教育进展, 2023, 13(5): 2847-2854. https://doi.org/10.12677/AE.2023.135448

参考文献

[1] Burton, D. (1981) Analysing Spoken Discourse. In: Coulthard, M. and Montgomery, M., Eds., Studies in Discourse Analysis, Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd., London, 61-81.
[2] Guthrie, A.M. (1995) English Conversation, by Amy B.M. Tsui. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994. xviii+298 pp. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6, 158-162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Halliday, M. (1972) Categories of the Theory of Grammar. In: Readings in Modern Linguistics: An Anthology, DeGruyter Mouton, Berlin, 157-208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 张杰. 伯明翰学派话语分析模式及其问题[J]. 安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版), 1994(1): 16-20.
[5] 路扬. 伯明翰学派话语分析法及其发展[J]. 外语研究, 1996(4): 7-10, 13.
[6] 何晓春. 浅谈伯明翰学派的课堂会话理论[J]. 梧州师专学报, 1997(1): 60-62.
[7] 丛璐. 中外教师英语课堂话语分析[J]. 黑龙江教育: 理论与实践, 2016(10): 51-52.
[8] 范文芳, 马靖香. 中国英语课堂上的IRF会话结构与交际性课堂教学模式研究[J]. 中国外语, 2011, 8(1): 65-71.
[9] MaCarthy, M. (2002) Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers. Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, Shanghai.
[10] David, N. (1987) Communicative Language Teaching: Making It Work. ELT Journal, 41, 136-145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 王光露. 关于Krashen的“语言输入假说”与Swain的“语言输出假设”在高校外语听力教学中的应用[J]. 海外英语2021(18): 112-113.
[12] Wells, G. (1993) Reevaluating the IRF Se-quence: A Proposal for the Articulation of Theories of Activity and Discourse for the Analysis of Teaching and Learning in the Classroom. Linguistics and Education, 5, 1-37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 林志新, 王竹筠. 试谈课堂讨论策略[J]. 中国大学教学, 2021(9): 12-16.
[14] (西汉)戴胜. 小戴礼记[Z].
[15] 束定芳. 中国特色外语教学改革探索[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社, 2012.
[16] 黄小玲. 优化课堂教学, 激发英语学习兴趣[J]. 中国科教创新导刊, 2009(26): 131, 133.
[17] Wright, B.M. (2016) Display and Referential Questions: Effects on Student Responses. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 15, 160-189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef