国际商事争议的解决——以判决的承认与执行为视角
Resolution of International Commercial Disputes—From the Perspective of Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments
摘要: 在国际商事争议解决中,国际商事诉讼作为其主要路径之一,其作用正日益得到重视。不同于仲裁裁决在承认与执行上所取得的进展,国际社会尚未在外国民商事判决承认与执行问题上取得广泛性共识,这对当事人选择国际诉讼作为争议解决方式构成了实质障碍。海牙国际私法会议以管辖权为线索,在推进外国民商事判决的承认与执行上作出了持续努力,业已通过的《选择法院协议公约》《海牙判决公约》规定了协议管辖和间接管辖权的有关事项,构成外国民商事判决承认与执行重要的法律渊源。会议继续推进的“管辖权项目”对直接管辖权的基础等问题的磋商,也将进一步推进该领域更多共识的取得。在推进国际商事纠纷多元解决机制构建的背景下,我国应进一步完善承认与执行外国民商事判决相关的法律制度,积极参与国际社会此领域的条约协商与合作,贡献中国智慧。
Abstract: In the area of international commercial dispute resolution, the role of international com-mercial litigation is gaining increasing importance as one of the main routes. Unlike the progress made in the recognition and enforcement of arbitration awards, the international community has not yet reached a broad consensus on the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in civil and commercial matters, which constitutes a significant obstacle to parties choosing international litigation as a means of dispute resolution. The Hague Conference on Private International Law has made sustained efforts to promote the recognition and enforcement of judgments along the lines of jurisdiction. The Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements and the Hague Judgments Con-vention, which have been concluded, provide for matters relating to agreed jurisdiction and indirect jurisdiction and constitute an important source of law for the recognition and enforcement of judg-ments. The consultation on issues such as the basis of direct jurisdiction under the “Jurisdiction project”, which the conference continues to explore, will also further advance the international community’s consensus in the area of recognition and enforcement of judgments. In the context of promoting the construction of a pluralistic mechanism for the settlement of international commer-cial disputes, China should further improve the relevant legal system for the recognition and en-forcement of judgments, actively participate in the international community’s treaty negotiations and cooperation in this area, and contribute Chinese wisdom.
文章引用:于跃. 国际商事争议的解决——以判决的承认与执行为视角[J]. 争议解决, 2023, 9(3): 1155-1162. https://doi.org/10.12677/DS.2023.93156

参考文献

[1] 张月姣. 国际商事争议解决途径综析[J]. 太平洋学报, 2007(3): 27-45.
[2] 宋建立. 《承认与执行外国民商事判决公约》及对我国的影响[J]. 人民司法, 2020(1): 88-92.
[3] Queen Mary University of London (2023) 2021
Inter-national Arbitration Survey: Adapting Arbitration to a Changing World. Queen Mary University of London.
https://arbitration.qmul.ac.uk/research/2021-international-arbitration-survey/
[4] United Nations (2023) Ti-mor-Leste accedes to Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. United Nations.
https://unis.unvienna.org/unis/en/pressrels/2023/unisl339.html
[5] 杜新丽. 论外国仲裁裁决在我国的承认与执行——兼论《纽约公约》在中国的适用[J]. 比较法研究, 2005(4): 98-109.
[6] 孟昭华. 国际商事仲裁一裁终局的困境与出路[J]. 四川师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2007(4): 15-20.
[7] 刘敬东, 张灿. 我国承认与执行外国法院生效判决的实证研究——基于对2018年至2020年人民法院典型案例的分析[J]. 海峡法学, 2021, 23(3): 82-90.
[8] 李旺, 王露. 外国判决效力法律适用规则的理论探析、价值考量与中国选择[J]. 清华法学, 2023, 17(2): 191-208.
[9] 蔡伟. 国际商事法庭: 制度比较、规则冲突与构建路径[J]. 环球法律评论, 2018, 40(5): 175-192.
[10] 王欣濛. 新加坡国际商业法庭的司法制度及启示[J]. 湖北社会科学, 2015(6): 161-165.
[11] 何其生. 海牙管辖权项目的新发展[J]. 武大国际法评论, 2020, 4(4): 1-16.
[12] 何其生. 间接管辖权制度的新发展及中国的模式选择[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2020, 38(5): 188-200.
[13] HCCH (2023) Convention on Choice of Court Agreements.
https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/
specialised-sections/choice-of-court#:~:text=The%20Convention%20of%
2030%20June%202005%20on%20Choice,selection%20clauses%22%29%20between%20parties%20to%20
international%20commercial%20transactions
[14] 杜涛. 中国批准海牙《选择法院协议公约》的法律问题及对策[J]. 武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2016, 69(4): 88-96.
[15] 徐国建. 世界首例适用海牙《选择法院协议公约》判决评述[C].《上海法学研究》集刊(2019年第17卷)——上海国际经济贸易仲裁委员会文集. 2019: 8.
https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=3uoqIhG8C467SBi
Ovrai6TdxYiSzCnOEqtmLmQZJXLeUh6QFM0rx2besUVwptHcSo24wo1F1yzf4pJgLxJ
95Z03fTMTvhS677ZRhkVt9QKo%3d&uniplatform=NZKPT
, 2023-04-23.
[16] HCCH (2023) Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters.
https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/specialised-sections/judgments
[17] 徐国建. 论法院判决全球流通的范围和限制——2019年《承认与执行外国民商事判决公约》适用范围评析[J]. 中国国际私法与比较法年刊, 2019, 24(1): 269-299.
[18] 徐国建. 2019年《海牙判决公约》判决承认和执行机制概述[J]. 中国应用法学, 2020(4): 65-77.
[19] 何其生. 海牙管辖权项目的困境与转变[J]. 武大国际法评论, 2022, 6(2): 36-58.
[20] 何其生. 海牙管辖权项目下平行诉讼的解决方案与启示[J]. 武大国际法评论, 2022, 6(5): 21-47.
[21] 最高人民法院. 最高人民法院关于人民法院为“一带一路”建设提供司法服务和保障的若干意见[N]. 人民法院报, 2015-07-08(002).
[22] 黄志慧. 我国判决承认与执行中互惠原则实施的困境与出路[J]. 政法论坛, 2018, 36(6): 63-76.
[23] 孙笑非, 吴琼. 《承认与执行外国民商事判决公约》评介与展望[J]. 国际法学刊, 2019(1): 155-164, 170.
[24] 袁发强. “一带一路”背景下国际民商事争议解决机制之建构[J]. 求是学刊, 2018, 45(5): 82-90.