存–流量关系判断中的S-F错误:年龄差异的视角
S-F Failure in the Judgment of Stock-Flow Relationships: Perspective of Age Difference
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2023.135252, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 王晓庄*: 天津师范大学心理学部,天津;天津师范大学心理与行为研究院,天津;学生心理发展与学习天津市高校社会科学实验室,天津;尤芊淳*, 梅志玲, 戴天琦, 孟鸿兴*:天津师范大学心理学部,天津
关键词: 存–流量关系判断S-F错误关联启发式简单匹配Stock and Flow Relationship Judgment Stock-Flow Failure Correlation Heuristic Simple Match
摘要: 存–流量关系判断中的S-F错误(Stock-Flow Failure,简称S-F错误)是人们在累积问题理解上所存在的典型错误。正确理解和管理存量与流量,对社会、企业和个人来说有着极为重要的意义。本研究中,实验一使用商场顾客量任务,选取五年级、初中、高中、大学及老年组被试,考察不同年龄组存–流量错误及类型的差异性;实验二和实验三使用画图任务,选取初、高中及大学三个年龄组,分别考察不同年龄组在关联启发式使用上的差异性,以及不同年龄组在将存量与流量简单匹配联系上的差异性。结果表明:1) 随年龄增长,被试出现存–流量错误和选择极值点的比例下降,选择Gap点的比例上升,但老年组分别出现回升和降低。2) 随年龄增长,被试使用关联启发式的比例下降。3) 随年龄增长,被试将存量轨迹与流入(出)量轨迹进行简答匹配的百分比降低,与净流量轨迹进行简单匹配的百分比增加。
Abstract: Stock-flow (S-F) failure in the judgment of stock-flow relationships is a typical failure in people’s understanding of accumulation problems. The correct understanding and management of stock and flow are of great importance to society, enterprises, and individuals. In this study, experiment I used the shopping mall customer volume task to select the fifth grade, middle school, high school, college and the elderly group to investigate the differences of deposit-traffic errors and types in different age groups. In experiments II and III, drawing task was used to select three age groups, namely junior, senior high and university, to investigate the differences in the use of correlation heuristics among different age groups, as well as the differences in the simple matching between stock and flow. The results show that: 1) With the increase of age, the proportion of stock-flow failure and maximum value point selection decreased, and the proportion of Gap point selection increased, but the old group showed a rise and a decrease respectively. 2) With the increase of age, the proportion of subjects using correlation heuristics decreased. 3) With the increase of age, the percentage of short answer matching between the stock trajectory and the inflow (outflow) trajectory decreases, while the percentage of simple matching between the stock trajectory and the net flow trajectory increases.
文章引用:王晓庄, 尤芊淳, 梅志玲, 戴天琦, 孟鸿兴 (2023). 存–流量关系判断中的S-F错误:年龄差异的视角. 心理学进展, 13(5), 2048-2058. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2023.135252

参考文献

[1] 韩布新, 朱莉琪(2012). 人类心理毕生发展理论. 中国科学院院刊, 27(S1), 78-87.
[2] 王晓庄, 王思聪, 牟伟莉, 张建娥, 尹文超(2018). 动态系统累积变量判断中的关联启发式. 心理科学进展, 26(2), 344-357.
[3] 郑雨明(2007). 决策判断中认知偏差及其干预策略. 统计与决策, 238(10), 48-51.
[4] Asik, G., & Kucuk, Z. D. (2021). Metacognition in Action as a Possible Explanation for Stock-Flow Failure. System Dynamics Review, 37, 253-282.[CrossRef
[5] Brunstein, A., Gonzalez, C., & Kanter, S. (2010). Effects of Domain Experience in the Stock-Flow Failure. System Dynamics Review, 26, 347-354.[CrossRef
[6] Chen, X. (2007). The Object Bias and the Study of Scientific Revolutions: Lessons from Developmental Psychology. Philosophical Psychology, 20, 479-503.[CrossRef
[7] Chen, X. (2011). Why Do People Misunderstand Climate Change? Heuristics, Mental Models and Ontological Assumptions. Climatic Change, 108, 31-46.[CrossRef
[8] Cronin, M. A., Gonzalez, C., & Sterman, J. D. (2009). Why Don’t Well-Educated Adults Understand Accumulation? A Challenge to Researchers, Educators, and Citizens. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 116-130.[CrossRef
[9] Diehl, D., & Sterman, J. D. (1995). Effects of Feedback Complexity on Dynamic Decisionmaking. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 62, 198-215.[CrossRef
[10] Dutt, V., & Gonzalez, C. (2012). Decisions from Experience Reduce Misconceptions about Climate Change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32, 19-29.[CrossRef
[11] Fischer, H., & Gonzalez, C. (2016). Making Sense of Dynamic Systems: How Our Understanding of Stocks and Flows Depends on a Global Perspective. Cognitive Science, 40, 496-512.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial Dynamics. MIT Press.
[13] Gonzalez, C., Qi, L., Sriwattanakomen, N., & Chrabaszcz, J. (2017). Graphical Features of Flow Behavior and the Stock and Flow Failure. System Dynamics Review, 33, 59-70.[CrossRef
[14] Jensen, E., & Brehmer, B. (2003). Understanding and Control of a Simple Dynamic System. System Dynamics Review, 19, 119-137.[CrossRef
[15] Kainz, D., & Ossimitz, G. (2002). Can Students Learn Stock-Flow-Thinking? An Empirical Investigation. In The 20th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society (pp. 1-34). System Dynamics Society.
[16] Kapmeier, F., Happach, R. M., & Tilebein, M. (2016). Bathtub Dynamics Revisited: An Examination of Deformation Professionelle in Higher Education. Systems Research & Behavioral Science, 34, 227-249.[CrossRef
[17] Nilsson, L. G., Sternäng, O., Rönnlund, M., & Nyberg, L. (2009). Challenging the Notion of an Early-Onset of Cognitive Decline. Neurobiology of Aging, 30, 521-524.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Ossimitz, G. (2002). Stock-Flow-Thinking and Reading Stock-Flow-Related Graphs: An Empirical Investigation in Dynamic-Thinking Abilities. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society. System Dynamics Society, Albany, NY.
[19] Park, D. C., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. (2009). The Adaptive Brain: Aging and Neurocognitive Scaffolding. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 173-196.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Ranney, M., Clark, D., Reinholz, D., & Cohen, S. (2012). Changing Global Warming Beliefs with Scientific Information: Knowledge, Attitudes, and RTMD (Reinforced Theistic Manifest Destiny Theory). Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 34, 2228-2233.
[21] Sterman, J. D. (1989). Modeling Managerial Behavior: Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision-Making Experiment. Management Science, 35, 321-339.[CrossRef
[22] Sterman, J. D. (2002). All Models Are Wrong: Reflections on Becoming a Systems Scientist. System Dynamics Review, 18, 501-531.[CrossRef
[23] Sterman, J. D. (2008). Risk Communication on Climate: Mental Models and Mass Balance. Science, 322, 532-533.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Sterman, J. D. (2012). Sustaining Sustainability: Creating a Systems Science in a Fragmented Academy and Polarized World. In M. P. Weinstein, & R. E. Turner (Eds.), Sustainability Science: The Emerging Paradigm and the Urban Environment (pp. 21-58). Springer.[CrossRef
[25] Sterner, E. O., Adawi, T., Persson, U. M., & Lundqvist, U. (2019). Knowing How and Knowing When: Unpacking Public Understanding of Atmospheric CO2 Accumulation. Climatic Change, 154, 49-67.[CrossRef